Jump to content
IGNORED

"Supreme Court informed Jack Smith's appointment to special counsel post is invalid"


WilliamL

Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  10
  • Topic Count:  99
  • Topics Per Day:  0.03
  • Content Count:  5,153
  • Content Per Day:  1.48
  • Reputation:   2,568
  • Days Won:  4
  • Joined:  11/06/2014
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  09/01/1950

"...a brief filed with the Supreme Court on behalf of a former U.S. attorney general, Edwin Meese, and other constitutional scholars, has thrown Smith a curve.

" The brief charges that Smith's appointment as special counsel is unconstitutional, so the high court must reject his campaign against Trump.

" ..."Their amicus (or 'friend of the court') brief argues that Smith lacks authority to represent the United States by asking the Supreme Court to weigh in (called a petition for certiorari) because the office he holds has not been created by Congress and his appointment violates the 'Appointments Clause' of the Constitution. ...

" The report found that such a result would mean the Supreme Court not only should refuse Smith's agenda against Trump, but lower federal courts would need to dismiss all of Smith's claims. "

https://www.wnd.com/2023/12/supreme-court-informed-jack-smiths-appointment-special-counsel-post-invalid/

 

It just keeps getting interestinglier and interestinglier.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  43
  • Topics Per Day:  0.10
  • Content Count:  3,349
  • Content Per Day:  7.59
  • Reputation:   1,305
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  03/01/2023
  • Status:  Offline

The law is not what is written in the books, it is what men decide it is based on what they want it to be.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  10
  • Topic Count:  99
  • Topics Per Day:  0.03
  • Content Count:  5,153
  • Content Per Day:  1.48
  • Reputation:   2,568
  • Days Won:  4
  • Joined:  11/06/2014
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  09/01/1950

2 hours ago, FJK said:

The law is not what is written in the books, it is what men decide it is based on what they want it to be.

 You are describing lawlessness.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  43
  • Topics Per Day:  0.10
  • Content Count:  3,349
  • Content Per Day:  7.59
  • Reputation:   1,305
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  03/01/2023
  • Status:  Offline

34 minutes ago, WilliamL said:

 You are describing lawlessness.

That is the times we live in now.  We live our days in the shadow of lawlessness and hope the consequences of it will fall on someone else and we will somehow escape them.

But we won't, it rains on both the just and the unjust when it rains.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...