jossshr Posted August 26, 2006 Group: Members Followers: 0 Topic Count: 3 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 15 Content Per Day: 0.00 Reputation: 0 Days Won: 0 Joined: 08/25/2006 Status: Offline Share Posted August 26, 2006 I am writing a new article on my site about the ending of the book of Mark. There is a lot of evidence that the book of Mark ends at 16:8 and that 9-20 were not written by Mark. I wanted to get some of your thoughts on this if you have heard about it. Most Bibles have a foot note after Mark 16:8 if you want to check it out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
larryt Posted August 26, 2006 Group: Royal Member Followers: 3 Topic Count: 52 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 2,230 Content Per Day: 0.31 Reputation: 124 Days Won: 1 Joined: 08/22/2004 Status: Offline Birthday: 05/03/1952 Share Posted August 26, 2006 I am writing a new article on my site about the ending of the book of Mark. There is a lot of evidence that the book of Mark ends at 16:8 and that 9-20 were not written by Mark. I wanted to get some of your thoughts on this if you have heard about it. Most Bibles have a foot note after Mark 16:8 if you want to check it out. Those bibles that do not have Mark 16:9-20 are missing the Word of God. LT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nebula Posted August 26, 2006 Group: Royal Member Followers: 10 Topic Count: 5,823 Topics Per Day: 0.76 Content Count: 45,870 Content Per Day: 5.95 Reputation: 1,897 Days Won: 83 Joined: 03/22/2003 Status: Offline Birthday: 11/19/1970 Share Posted August 26, 2006 Hey, we agree on something! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Floatingaxe Posted August 26, 2006 Group: Royal Member Followers: 3 Topic Count: 62 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 9,613 Content Per Day: 1.45 Reputation: 656 Days Won: 9 Joined: 03/11/2006 Status: Offline Birthday: 05/31/1952 Share Posted August 26, 2006 I am writing a new article on my site about the ending of the book of Mark. There is a lot of evidence that the book of Mark ends at 16:8 and that 9-20 were not written by Mark. I wanted to get some of your thoughts on this if you have heard about it. Most Bibles have a foot note after Mark 16:8 if you want to check it out. Those bibles that do not have Mark 16:9-20 are missing the Word of God. LT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jossshr Posted August 26, 2006 Group: Members Followers: 0 Topic Count: 3 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 15 Content Per Day: 0.00 Reputation: 0 Days Won: 0 Joined: 08/25/2006 Status: Offline Author Share Posted August 26, 2006 Those bibles that do not have Mark 16:9-20 are missing the Word of God. LT Actually two of the most important and oldest manuscripts don't have that portion of Mark and the context of what is said seems kind of wierd I found this article about it when researching. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Floatingaxe Posted August 26, 2006 Group: Royal Member Followers: 3 Topic Count: 62 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 9,613 Content Per Day: 1.45 Reputation: 656 Days Won: 9 Joined: 03/11/2006 Status: Offline Birthday: 05/31/1952 Share Posted August 26, 2006 Those bibles that do not have Mark 16:9-20 are missing the Word of God. LT Actually two of the most important and oldest manuscripts don't have that portion of Mark and the context of what is said seems kind of wierd I found this article about it when researching. Nothing weird about it! It is included in the Canon, and I know God wanted it there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LadyGunivere Posted August 26, 2006 Group: Diamond Member Followers: 1 Topic Count: 19 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 454 Content Per Day: 0.07 Reputation: 2 Days Won: 0 Joined: 07/30/2006 Status: Offline Birthday: 04/19/1985 Share Posted August 26, 2006 Amen to that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billie Posted August 26, 2006 Group: Royal Member Followers: 1 Topic Count: 51 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 2,849 Content Per Day: 0.44 Reputation: 14 Days Won: 0 Joined: 07/17/2006 Status: Offline Birthday: 03/17/1979 Share Posted August 26, 2006 If God didn't want it there, it wouldn't be there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jossshr Posted August 26, 2006 Group: Members Followers: 0 Topic Count: 3 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 15 Content Per Day: 0.00 Reputation: 0 Days Won: 0 Joined: 08/25/2006 Status: Offline Author Share Posted August 26, 2006 If God didn't want it there, it wouldn't be there. I'm not attacking the canon. But you may want to research the Comma Johanneum. It was in the KJV and NKJV yet with the more recent translations such as the NIV, ESV and NASB, it has been taken out. So God didn't take that piece out for a couple hundred years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billie Posted August 26, 2006 Group: Royal Member Followers: 1 Topic Count: 51 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 2,849 Content Per Day: 0.44 Reputation: 14 Days Won: 0 Joined: 07/17/2006 Status: Offline Birthday: 03/17/1979 Share Posted August 26, 2006 Well now you're getting into a translation issue. I stick with good ol KJV. I may look to the NIV sometimes for clarification, but the KJV's always the authority in my book. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts