WorthyNewsBot Posted January 27, 2009 Group: Bots Followers: 3 Topic Count: 39,879 Topics Per Day: 6.45 Content Count: 44,452 Content Per Day: 7.19 Reputation: 987 Days Won: 2 Joined: 06/06/2007 Status: Offline Share Posted January 27, 2009 George Mitchell, the new US peace envoy, will fly into Israel today as the Obama administration signals its determination to tackle the Middle East conflict. http://www.worthynews.com/top/timesonline-...-1233044431569/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nebula Posted January 27, 2009 Group: Royal Member Followers: 10 Topic Count: 5,823 Topics Per Day: 0.75 Content Count: 45,870 Content Per Day: 5.94 Reputation: 1,897 Days Won: 83 Joined: 03/22/2003 Status: Offline Birthday: 11/19/1970 Share Posted January 27, 2009 Now why didn't the report mention anything about what the Israelis living in Sderot and Ashkelon have been going through with Hamas' rocket fire on them? (I know, I know . . . it's just a comment of exasperation.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest shiloh357 Posted January 28, 2009 Share Posted January 28, 2009 The selection of George Mitchell tells us where Obama really stands on this issue. George Mitchell is very anti-Semitic and was the author of the 2001 "Mitichell Plan" He is openly hostile to Israel and wants to create a terror state on either side of Israel out of Gaza and the West Bank. Under Georege Mitchell, the "Two-State Solution" is code for "the destruction of Israel." Appointing such a person to deal wth this conflict shows Obama's real position on this conflict. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest shiloh357 Posted January 29, 2009 Share Posted January 29, 2009 The selection of George Mitchell tells us where Obama really stands on this issue. George Mitchell is very anti-Semitic and was the author of the 2001 "Mitichell Plan" He is openly hostile to Israel and wants to create a terror state on either side of Israel out of Gaza and the West Bank. Under Georege Mitchell, the "Two-State Solution" is code for "the destruction of Israel." Appointing such a person to deal wth this conflict shows Obama's real position on this conflict. I thought his plan was the basis for the "road map" that Pres Bush has used since 2002 You mean the roadmap to hell that Bush and Rice ramrodded down Israel's throat? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest shiloh357 Posted January 29, 2009 Share Posted January 29, 2009 The selection of George Mitchell tells us where Obama really stands on this issue. George Mitchell is very anti-Semitic and was the author of the 2001 "Mitichell Plan" He is openly hostile to Israel and wants to create a terror state on either side of Israel out of Gaza and the West Bank. Under Georege Mitchell, the "Two-State Solution" is code for "the destruction of Israel." Appointing such a person to deal wth this conflict shows Obama's real position on this conflict. I thought his plan was the basis for the "road map" that Pres Bush has used since 2002 You mean the roadmap to hell that Bush and Rice ramrodded down Israel's throat? Yes, that is the one. So you are saying that Obama stands in the same place the Bush and Rice did on this issue? Seems most people would be happy with that The Roadmap was a joke, and Obama's policies will be worse than the roadmap. Obama wants to create a contiguous palestinian state which would cut Israel in half and leave every community in Israel vulnerable to terrorist attacks. Like the Roadmap, any peace plan engineered on Obama's watch will amount to nothing but a one-sided surrender on Israel's part. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MorningGlory Posted January 29, 2009 Group: Royal Member Followers: 0 Topic Count: 1,022 Topics Per Day: 0.16 Content Count: 39,193 Content Per Day: 6.09 Reputation: 9,977 Days Won: 78 Joined: 10/01/2006 Status: Offline Share Posted January 29, 2009 The selection of George Mitchell tells us where Obama really stands on this issue. George Mitchell is very anti-Semitic and was the author of the 2001 "Mitichell Plan" He is openly hostile to Israel and wants to create a terror state on either side of Israel out of Gaza and the West Bank. Under Georege Mitchell, the "Two-State Solution" is code for "the destruction of Israel." Appointing such a person to deal wth this conflict shows Obama's real position on this conflict. I thought his plan was the basis for the "road map" that Pres Bush has used since 2002 You mean the roadmap to hell that Bush and Rice ramrodded down Israel's throat? Yes, that is the one. So you are saying that Obama stands in the same place the Bush and Rice did on this issue? Seems most people would be happy with that The Roadmap was a joke, and Obama's policies will be worse than the roadmap. Obama wants to create a contiguous palestinian state which would cut Israel in half and leave every community in Israel vulnerable to terrorist attacks. Like the Roadmap, any peace plan engineered on Obama's watch will amount to nothing but a one-sided surrender on Israel's part. Hopefully the Israelis will stop listening to other leaders and turn to God for direction. It seems every U.S. President since Reagan has pursued the same stupid agenda. My question is 'why'? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest shiloh357 Posted January 29, 2009 Share Posted January 29, 2009 The selection of George Mitchell tells us where Obama really stands on this issue. George Mitchell is very anti-Semitic and was the author of the 2001 "Mitichell Plan" He is openly hostile to Israel and wants to create a terror state on either side of Israel out of Gaza and the West Bank. Under Georege Mitchell, the "Two-State Solution" is code for "the destruction of Israel." Appointing such a person to deal wth this conflict shows Obama's real position on this conflict. I thought his plan was the basis for the "road map" that Pres Bush has used since 2002 You mean the roadmap to hell that Bush and Rice ramrodded down Israel's throat? Yes, that is the one. So you are saying that Obama stands in the same place the Bush and Rice did on this issue? Seems most people would be happy with that The Roadmap was a joke, and Obama's policies will be worse than the roadmap. Obama wants to create a contiguous palestinian state which would cut Israel in half and leave every community in Israel vulnerable to terrorist attacks. Like the Roadmap, any peace plan engineered on Obama's watch will amount to nothing but a one-sided surrender on Israel's part. Hopefully the Israelis will stop listening to other leaders and turn to God for direction. It seems every U.S. President since Reagan has pursued the same stupid agenda. My question is 'why'? One Word: OIL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MorningGlory Posted January 29, 2009 Group: Royal Member Followers: 0 Topic Count: 1,022 Topics Per Day: 0.16 Content Count: 39,193 Content Per Day: 6.09 Reputation: 9,977 Days Won: 78 Joined: 10/01/2006 Status: Offline Share Posted January 29, 2009 The selection of George Mitchell tells us where Obama really stands on this issue. George Mitchell is very anti-Semitic and was the author of the 2001 "Mitichell Plan" He is openly hostile to Israel and wants to create a terror state on either side of Israel out of Gaza and the West Bank. Under Georege Mitchell, the "Two-State Solution" is code for "the destruction of Israel." Appointing such a person to deal wth this conflict shows Obama's real position on this conflict. I thought his plan was the basis for the "road map" that Pres Bush has used since 2002 You mean the roadmap to hell that Bush and Rice ramrodded down Israel's throat? Yes, that is the one. So you are saying that Obama stands in the same place the Bush and Rice did on this issue? Seems most people would be happy with that The Roadmap was a joke, and Obama's policies will be worse than the roadmap. Obama wants to create a contiguous palestinian state which would cut Israel in half and leave every community in Israel vulnerable to terrorist attacks. Like the Roadmap, any peace plan engineered on Obama's watch will amount to nothing but a one-sided surrender on Israel's part. Hopefully the Israelis will stop listening to other leaders and turn to God for direction. It seems every U.S. President since Reagan has pursued the same stupid agenda. My question is 'why'? One Word: OIL Oh yeah...how could I forget? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts