Sparks

You should thank me for teaching you how to look up White Paper retractions right here in this forum, and my post has everything to do with your information being 3 years out-of-date. You posted to a 3 year old post. Besides, it is the treatment of Hydroxychloroquine and Zinc that should be studied because zinc is the antiviral. Hydroxychloroquine helps the zinc get into cells to slow the production of viruses. Hydroxychloroquine and Zinc saved lives because people simply took it, and it works. Quit whining about a study that was made in March of 2020, long before the gene therapy shots were released, and consider that a poorly made study does not equate to Hydroxychloroquine (and Zinc) not working. The biggest complaint was that the study group was too small.

You are in contact with all of Congress, and they told you this? It's a good thing they have your ear so you can report this.

Not quite, but it shows that the government tattled on itself which is highly abnormal. It only does that while in damage control and that beats your "ignore all the facts argument." I see you didn't read what the government admitted it did wrong, and incidentally what it admitted, equates to what you got wrong. You are always asking for sources, and this time you got an official one straight from the horses' mouth, but you ignore it. Try downloading the PDF I cited, and give it a read.

You need to update your knowledge. Your side was the false information peddler. I believe government is the biggest liar since Satan, but consider that government itself admitted the issues. Did you even look at the summary of the report from Congress I proved you?

No possibility of it being a miracle from God, as suggested in the Bible? Mary was a virgin, too. Part of the deal about inheriting sin is that we inherit it from Adam (paternal side). Jesus was without sin, period. He didn't inherit sin like the rest of us did.

The irony.

Like gene therapies? Don't feel sorry for me. I have been vindicated along with the alternative media. The liberals, government, mainstream media, social media and vaccine pushers are the ones limping away in shame. And incidentally, I am not against vaccines. I am against forced vaccines, and garbage in vaccines. mRNA gene therapy are not vaccines, though. I am against them being forced on people, but I still think if you want to inject yourself with them, go ahead. In fact, you can have mine. I survived just fine without them.

He is mostly writing to himself, but yes. You are right. He cannot help himself.

Yes, you might find that your side's arguments were ignorant, but ignorance is curable. The US Government just released their official reports on how the Pandemic was handled, and it turns out that many of the heroes on your side are in trouble and will likely face legal problems, unless Biden 'pre-pardons' them, not that they cannot still be sued in a civil court. Naturally, this is government reporting on government, so they held back a bit, but it is not a good report. I posted the official report here, as a PDF download, and an AI summary of the large report.

You are three years behind on this topic. Your side lost, but it is good to see you in the forums. Welcome back!

This is the rest of the story from USA Today: What else did Trump say about Canada and tariffs? Trump recently joked that Canada should become the 51st state, even suggesting it directly to Trudeau during their dinner at Mar-a-Lago, Fox News reported. Trudeau later told reporters that his conversation with Trump had been "excellent" but didn't comment beyond that. But on Sunday, the president-elect told NBC’s Meet the Press, "We’re subsidizing Canada to the tune of over $100 billion a year. We’re subsidizing Mexico for almost $300 billion. We shouldn’t be — why are we subsidizing these countries? If we’re going to subsidize them, let them become a state."

Can you quote Trump concerning this?

Texas Lt. Governor Dan Patrick is trying to bid for the steel to give back to President Trump. Biden did the same thing with the US Oil Reserves that President Trump filled when oil was so cheap during his term; Biden sold the reserves off.

Yours would stand if D'Souza had not ended his public apology to one man, with a notice that said the premise of the film is true. These are the parts that you tried to omit which kick the legs out from under your argument. You also claim to have seen it all, and it would stand if you actually had. I have shown you why you haven't. Law suits are expensive to defend, even when you are in the right. Admitting a wrong, does not mean the entire film was all wrong, and 'admitting a wrong' does not even mean there was a wrong, in this case. It would be interesting to go to court and see if a jury felt that a unamed and blurred out man, really was damaged. The GBI clearing the guy is a little sketchy, too. The most that GBI could claim is that the family ballots were in the drop box pile, not that he didn't have 10 or 20 other ballots along with his family, that he dropped in, too. We can presume he is innocent, of course, but it would be a little weird if the guy's phone ID kept going to drop boxes.

"Andrews filed a federal lawsuit in October 2022 against D'Souza, True the Vote and Salem Media Group." -- NPR I thought you would appreciate the liberal media stating who was sued. What I posted still stands.

I see you do quote like the main stream media. I think you meant to say he apologized to one man who was not even identified in the book or movie, who sued, and a settlement was made. He also went on to quote what was correct about the film, but you have omitted it. He wrote, "We also continue to have faith that True the Vote’s underlying geolocation data and analysis uncovered highly suspicious cell phone travel patterns, including a significant number of cell phone IDs that were recorded at more than ten drop box locations. While the video in the film created an incorrect inference as to Mr. Andrews, the underlying premise of the film holds true." Why do you media types only quote part of the truth? Hypothetically, if the film didn't correctly set geofencing in all cases, explain the people with loaves of ballots in their hands stuffing boxes.

I have not made you the topic. I have made your arguments the topic, and I have suggested that while you were there in your particular town to see things and you claim you have seen it all, you have not seen it all, especially nation wide. I have given you about a dozen types of cheats that really have happened, and you have not addressed any of it nor given me a reason why it didn't happen in your town. You admit you don't want to address the specifics probably because you cannot, which is why I say to you, ignorance is bliss. Now for your knowledge, ignorance is correctable. Modern generations have tried to make ignorance (uneducated, unaware, or uninformed) equate to stupid (lack of intelligence), which I do not. To correct your ignorance, you could look all the way into cheating rather than just doubting it happened. I have mainly asked questions of you, like have you audited the Dominion software? Did you check the voter rolls for dead people, and how many of them voted? Because if you have not made a personal audit into matters like these, you cannot have reviewed it all as you claim. Questions are not assertions, and to be clear, I don't care to know you personally. Suffice it to say, I don't know you at all, but I do know your weak arguments. I am addressing arguments you made, but which you cannot defend. Since you might have lost track: You maintain that cheating happened, but have implied that it is not why Trump lost. My argument is that cheating happened, and it is why Trump lost. We agree that cheating happened. The specifics that you don't want to tackle is the debate. If you do not want to discuss this, then why do you keep replying?

People say ignorance is bliss. You say you have examined it all, but not the dead people voting, or illegals, or people bussed in from other states whose affidavits cannot be verified, or the Dominion software auditing, or looked over the evidence Mike Lindell tried to present to the Supreme Court, or documentaries like 2000 Mules, that show the mules carrying loafs of ballots night-and-day to unattended voter boxes (and geofencing tracking them from box-to-box), and people stuffing counting machines, counting the same stacks over-and-over after they sent witnesses home claiming a fake emergency, and more. So, you really are using your imagination when you ignore it all.

Well, between you and Trump maybe. I believe in your free speech, but I wonder if you would quit bashing Trump on every other post, if you would get better fruit? People are tired of the negativity, and you have not made a good case. People have tried to tell you this, gently, but it does not seem to register with you. Give positivity a shot, and see what happens.

You have asked before, and I have already pointed it out. Every time I have said that it is too bad your side lost, you have defended the other side. If you cannot remember me pointing out these things, why would I take a part of my day to re-remind you just for you to forget? Suffice it to say, just about every time @Debp posts a video about Harris' bad conduct, at a minimum, you rush in and say "Yeah, but Trump ..." and are NEVER critical of Democrats. Do you not even know you are doing this? It is hypothetically like this: Video: "Harris' only accomplishment at the border is that she managed to lose 300,000 migrant children!" Neighbor: "Yeah, but Trump hurt my feelings in a tweet and is bad. He is snake, and orange, but I want you to believe I voted for him." You have literally called him a snake, and orange. You famously use logic fallacies. This one is called a false dichotomy in which you are trying to present a false set of choices where supporters donate, and non-supporters don't; a false argument. In truth there are many options, not just these two choices and if I say 'no' to your question, it does not give you a leg up on me to claim through virtue signaling that you are a better supporter than me, because you paid some amount to a campaign, which you cannot even prove happened.

Imagine if the 10 million voters who allegedly voted, where really just 5 million who voted twice. Imagine if the 10 million where actually registered voters who also just so happened to be dead. Imagine if the 10 million voters were actually weighted tallies where for every Biden vote, he got a score of 1.5 votes to Trumps .5 votes, since the Dominion software was not audited. What if the 10 million voters came from improper voters who were never vetted, but were counted anyway? What if the 10 million were illegals who should not have been allowed to vote, but did? What if the 10 million voters were 7 million voters, as you have been told, because 81 - 74 = 7, all day long? There are too many ways to cheat, and you have not examined them all. So how many dead voters voted at your precinct? 30%? 80%? All it needed to be was 2.8% for your state, and considering your state allows voters to sign an affidavit (technically no ID required to vote in this way), what if the '10 million' where people voting in precincts all around your area again, and again, who are not even from your state?

I already have a few times. Look at your posts. You cannot miss them. I don't understand your question. Are you asking if I have donated money or time to the Trump or Republican campaigns?

You manage. Why not review your history and see how many times you do it, or how many times people have pointed out that you are doing it?

Your actions have been to tirelessly defend the Democrats, and bash Trump. Bashing Trump is your sole consistent trait. It is very difficult to believe that you would not have a severe cognitive dissonance in voting for Trump.

Yeah, but your actions ...