Jump to content

Sparks

Worthy Ministers
  • Posts

    6,159
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    8

Everything posted by Sparks

  1. Speciation is real. Macroevolution is not, and is not observed. We have 1400+ 'species' of bats, but they are still bats (same kind). Same with the e. coli that exhibited a new trait, but all other e. coli has the same data and so the data is present in all the e. coli, whether or not it grows on citrate. In other words, both have the same DNA, and nothing new. When you find a bat giving birth to a non-bat, let me know; you will have witnessed macroevolution.
  2. It's simply that you don't understand what I wrote, or the topic. Look again:
  3. All you need is the right conditions and the placement of an item, and you will have a fossil or it will be petrified. You can intentionally make them in a lab in a single day. People find petrified and fossilized items that are not that old, so 1). fossils to not take millions of billions of years to make, and 2). they are not evidence of evolution. A man left a bucket of acorns and forgot them, but when he returned a year or two later the acorns were stone. Bags of flour, pickles, and more turn to stone in a few years under the right conditions. The pickle was found in a 1930's pickle jar and the lid had rusted off, and the pickle was stone. A dead man was buried, but when they dug a grave next to his to bury his wife, they struck water and when they open the man's grave, he had turned to stone. He was in the ground for 14 years, not trillions of years. I asked how fossils were evidence of evolution, but I see you have no answer.
  4. I have already said so. A 'scientist' like Richard Lenski claims that e. coli suddenly growing on citrate is is macro (new information added to the genome), but it turns out it's not new at all, and is only micro. That is the e. coli used existing information, not new. Honest scientists pointed out the error, but you cannot stop dishonesty with something as simple as honesty. Sorry, I know you are about to hose down the thread with links attempting to counter what I just said, but I am right, and the links you are about to plaster everywhere, are not.
  5. There are a lot of bad scientists who pretend to have observed it, but they observed micro, not macro.
  6. As recently as 2005, they have found collagen fibers, red blood cells, blood vessels and skin. In perfect conditions, DNA may last 100,000 years. Yet scientists have found DNA inside an allegedly 65 million year old Hadrosaurus. Evolution 'scientists' skip over problems like this when they cannot explain them.
  7. Macroevolution is something unobserved. A theory. Now there are a lot of bad scientists like Richard Lensky who think they see macro when they observe micro, but that's about it. They claim Cit+ evolves in the LTEE, but the old and new strains have the same data in their DNA, and therefore it is just more micro.
  8. The point is it does not take trillions of years to make them, like the evolution crowd believes. They believe a fossil indicates evolution, but why?
  9. Microevolution is real, the rest is not. You mistake micro for macro, and the other alleged 5 types. Haven't you ever asked yourself if evolution happened, why we don't have 20 or 30 billion people right now? Why you never, ever, ever see macroevolution of one kind producing another kind? Why do you see no one growing little wing stubs, or antlers? You have fallen for Satan's joke.
  10. It has flown. They mislabel micro as macro, is why. Why would I when I see the truth? You have conflated one type of real evolution for all this false bunk.
  11. You have been fooled by Satan, and by the lying scientists who write this bunk about evolution.
  12. Fossils are not evidence of evolution, they are evidence that something that once lived, died. You will find that a world-wide flood, and the wrath of God, caused the vast majority of fossils that you find scattered in the fake geologic column. It might surprise to know that you can make amber and fossils with little effort. You will find that the famous transitional fossils were made by people, with little effort. You have been fooled by Satan.
  13. There is not the remotest chance that you have evidence that humans are monkeys.
  14. If you learn the roots of a little Greek and Latin, you won't need a dictionary very often.
  15. So, if God had created the sun first, you would have believed Him? Is the god you believe-in so weak he cannot claim 24 hour periods without a sun, because it would no sweat for God Almighty to know the time-of-day, while creating the place where we would live and tell the time-of-day. I guess the god of evolution is a real wimp, especially compared to God Almighty!
  16. And I just showed you the Latin phrase. Do you deny everything you see with your own eyes?
  17. I am not talking about heaven, I am talking about the New Earth and no, our sun didn't exist until the fourth day.
  18. Revelation describes our future in which God will be our sun. No sun, and no moon required. Incidentally, since God created the entire universe, it's laws, properties and everything in it, ... I bet He can count hours without a sun or moon or even a wristwatch. Revelation 21:23 (KJV) And the city had no need of the sun, neither of the moon, to shine in it: for the glory of God did lighten it, and the Lamb is the light thereof.
  19. Uni = One Verse = Sentence The Bible describes God speaking to create the universe. You will notice, Jesus merely spoke Lazrus back to life. Perhaps we honor His astonishing power that He spoke the universe into existence every time we say Universe. Naturally, secular evolutionists don't want to think they are doing that.
  20. He said "Let their be light," and all kinds of things were created in that moment. He designed time, space and matter at that moment, the various laws like gravity, and naturally, light became a thing. It might surprise you to know that "Universe" means, one spoken sentence.
×
×
  • Create New...