eileenhat

Senior Member
  • Content count

    713
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

372 Excellent

2 Followers

About eileenhat

  • Rank
    Senior Member

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Female
  • Location
    California
  • Interests
    I love sharing about the Lord.
  1. There is a spiritual war for your soul. Does that help? There are several layers to simple possession. Add in a mental illness and now you have to really dig deeper to get answers. To become possessed means you have opened some doorway spiritually, that demons are accessing. For example, scary movies demon oriented are made to get people possessed. It was not a mistake on the screenwriters part, but a plan coercion for your soul. I am not much for psychology because you can not easily find people capable. I've had no luck. You could ask around for references (ie. begin to open up to discussing your disease). You might be harboring resentments for example, but basically it is on your shoulders to dig them out. Not truly someone else's (I mean complaint and a non compliant attitude just drives the issues further down, rather than bringing them to the surface for healing from God). There are a vast array of self help tools (groups etc.) too. You wanted it to be easy and what you ended up with is something very hard.
  2. I know nothing of the JW's. Just what God speaks. It is a gift of the holy spirit. Any one of you can have this gift. It is not something that God denies his people (ie. hearing the voice of the holy spirit). It also takes due diligence (ie. reading the word/research). God spoke of this time in Revelations, ie. the resurrection of the Saints, but few heard. The message from the Churches usually stops at the rapture, though revelations speaks of no such occurrence. Instead the entire Book is about a strong delusion that God ends with his Saints resurrection here on earth. A simple message, but one that seems to have remain hiddened (a veil perhaps) from the masses. The veil is lifting, that is all. Revelations 12 comes after another chapter that references two such resurrections from the dead. A precursor to the final event. A progenitor. This women seems to point directly to that lead up in chapter (11). And we already know that the 144,000 are to be part of the resurrected saints. Thus bringing both Jews (this 144,000) and Christians together in new bodies here on earth. Fulfilling prophecy for such an ending. Though I could go further and add that many Christians are also Jews by descent. Rumors are that Jews existed in England at the forming of the first Christian Church in 37AD. 4 years post crucifixation. Something I've posted about prior. Jews are also a designation by God that you are his children. So he determines who is a Jew. An other way to see this '144,000'. In fact, I doubt very much that only '144,000' saints are resurrected. I get a much higher number is at play (when I ask God). The use of 12,000 from 12 tribes sounds like a 'foundational' number meant to convey a number of supreme unity under God (from my view). A 'building' block of enlightened (ie. lighted by God) souls.
  3. Re; Forgiveness of sins Come to Jesus as a little child. Does a child chide himself or trust instead? Right now you are dealing with easy stuff. Surface fears. Trust that God will help you and he will. No matter how you are feeling. Feelings can become judgemental. Just note that you are judging (yourself in this instance) and stop. We can be like little children and accept God's embrace over our lives without judging ourselves, as it occurs. There is no right way to do this. You might feel good, might never feel quite adequate. God's forgiving nature is boundless. ...have to go but researching this topic further (see 1 john 3:19-21).....
  4. The elect are God's children here on Earth. The '144,000' are the resurrected saints of Rev. 20:4. They are also the 12 stars in the 'crown' on the womens head rev. 12:1 (ie. representing the 12 tribes). I see the '144,000' as metaphor and not as an exact number of resurrected saints. '144,000' is 12,000 from 12 tribes. It is a good way to say that these people are God's children, without getting into semantics (where everyone gets bogged down in the bible. ie. 'who' exactly are consider God's children). People like to say it is only Jews living in Israel, for example, are what Revelations references, rather than seeing that God is going beyond that designation and saying there is more than just them (those that cll themselves Jews today, living in Israel) involved in the resurrection. That other tribes of God's children exist, basically, and will be resurrected. Not just Jew/Hebrew self identified descendants. Eliot's commentary describes his take on this topic here**. The 'elect' are God's children. Here is what Irvin baxter says on this topic of who are the elect. Title: "Aren’t the Elect in Matthew 24:31 the Jews?" https://www.endtime.com/q-and-a/arent-elect-matthew-2431-jews/ **Ellicott's commentary http://biblehub.com/commentaries/revelation/7-4.htm Excerpt re: nature of 144,000 "...and the Apostle most emphatically laid down the principle that “he is not a Jew which is one outwardly, neither is that circumcision which is outward in the flesh, but he is a Jew which is one inwardly, and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit and not in the letter” (Romans 2:28-29); and the principle he applies by affirming that in Christ “there is neither Jew nor Greek” (Galatians 3:28). The Christian Church absorbs the Jewish, inherits her privileges, and adopts, with wider and nobler meaning, her phraseology. She has her Jerusalem, but it is a heavenly Jerusalem (Hebrews 12:22): a Jerusalem from above (Galatians 4:26): a new Jerusalem (Revelation 21:2; see Revelation 3:12); and to that Jerusalem of God the true Israel of God, the chosen generation and royal priesthood of every age, turn the eye of faith."
  5. When a family membe rises in anger against another family member, the air gets charged with their anger. It effects the event for anyone there. Pray for smooth sailing at this event then (and trust your husband to talk to whom he wants. It is his right too as well. Even if it raises more issues now.).
  6. Re: rev. 12 'Crown' of 12 stars* Sun vs star vs lampstand I've been looking at aspects of this 'sun', 'star' and 'lampstand/candlestick' business. First, I had a vision a few years ago of what an angel looks like here on earth (seen with spiritual eyes...ie. in a vision sent by God about my past episode with one as a young child (unbeknowst to me at the time)). This angel was very brilliant, with light shooting off in all directions, like a star burst. OK. So Jesus is referred to as having his "contenance shone as the sun'***. The 7 angels of the 7 churches (had a short vision about them as well, another story) are referred to in bible in Revelations as 'stars' ** and in Revelations the 7 Churches are as 'candlesticks' (or 'lampstands' (depending on bible version used here). The two witnesses of Rev. 11 are referred to as 'candlesticks"**** (or 'lampstands'). Note they are resurrected in Rev. 11*****. See a pattern here? A resurrected soul emits a frequency pattern of the same frequency as an entire "church". One of the twelve tribes together emits the same frequency pattern as an angel. This woman has Jesus light shone on her (as the sun), is therefore both a resurrected saint and is glorified (ie. immortal). A tall order. I am stating she is glorified in her contenance because Jesus light shines on her (not that she emits the light of the sun herself). She is therefore a bridge between heaven and Earth, in human form (as good as it gets). A perfect role model for newly resurrected saints to follow. "Crown of 12 stars" Now looking again at 'crown of 12 stars". Here, as I already mentioned in previous post above, Rev. 12 indicates the return/rulership on earth of the resurrected saints (holy spirit confirms this right now). They are the "12 stars". "Stars" means as a light upon the Earth they have the power of stars (ie. angels). As a 'group' they have reached immortality (a permament state of grace with God), just not individually (true says holy spirit). They form a 'crown' (crowns are bestowed on authority figures) on this woman's head. So they have authority on earth through her actions/power ability to bridge heaven and Earth (ie. she stands on the moon, which is between earth and heaven in our skies). It is a woman because women are nurturers and also authoritarians for the children they raise. In a sense then these newly resurrected saints are her children (again holy spirit says 'yes'). Her heirs. Together they work for Jesus here on earth. She is 'clothed' with Jesus's grace (ie. 'sun') ('true' says holy spirit). summary So a woman becomes a great wonder (indicated by the fact that a 'sign' in the sky results, ie. a perfect star configuration commemorating this event appears in the sky verifying her very nature/contribution to man)... ('true' says holy spirit). She gains power and authority out of Revelation's resulting resurrected saints (there job being to rule here on earth in jesus's name, with Jesus being at God's right hand in throne room in heaven...which I had a vision about this past December 2016). She uses her power/authority to be crowned with their 'star' powers and wields them as a mother. She uses her power to care (for them). So the two fighters against satan in Revelations that are human, join forces this coming Sept. 2017 (as the stars indicate). .. ('true says holy spirit'). ...... ..... *"Rev. 12:2 KJV "And there appeared a great wonder in heaven; a woman clothed with the sun, and the moon under her feet, and upon her head a crown of twelve stars:" **Rev. 1:20 KJ21 " The mystery of the seven stars which thou sawest in My right hand, and the seven golden candlesticks: the seven stars are the angels of the seven churches, and the seven candlesticks which thou sawest are the seven churches." ***Rev. 1:16 KJ21 "16 And He had in His right hand seven stars, and out of His mouth went a sharp twoedged sword, and His countenance shone as the sun shineth in his strength." ****rev. 11:4 KJ21 " These are the two olive trees and the two candlesticks, standing before the God of the earth." ***** Rev. 11:7-11 "The Witnesses Killed and Raised 7And when they shall have completed their testimony, the beast coming up out of the abyss will make war with them, and will overcome them, and will kill them. 8And their body will be upon the street of the great city, which is called spiritually Sodom and Egypt, where also their Lord was crucified.9And those of the peoples and tribes and tongues and nations gaze upon their bodies three and a half days, and they will not allow their bodies to be put into a tomb. 10And those dwelling on the earth rejoice over them and make merry, and will send gifts to one another, because these two prophets have tormented those dwelling upon the earth. 11And after the three and a half days, the spirit of life from God entered into them, and they stood upon their feet; and great fear fell upon those beholding them. 12And they heard a great voice out of heaven, saying to them, “Come up here.” And they went up to heaven in the cloud, and their enemies beheld them." Berean Literal bible Footnote Luke 20:35-36 sums it up "35 But those who are considered worthy of taking part in the age to come and in the resurrection from the dead will neither marry nor be given in marriage, 36 and they can no longer die; for they are like the angels. They are God’s children, since they are children of the resurrection." NIV
  7. Hi Heb 13:8 Been enjoying your thread and all the passages you have linked to regarding rev. 12. I do not see 'the woman' as Israel in Rev. 12. Israel is called 'Israel' all through revelations. No need to make it another mystery here (as that is what Rev. 12 is, a mystery that must be revealed by God). I see the dragon as satan. Satan is after a woman that brings forth the resurrection saint's thrones. I do not see any metaphor there. I see 'the child being born' as the resurrected saints (so a clear reference to Rev. 20:4, when they take their thrones). There is verbiage regarding joining with God (ie. taken up) and 'thrones' (ie. 'a throne') associated with this 'child'. I do not see it as a real baby (like our messiah's birth), therefore it is a metaphor for a similar occurrence (ie. a salvation event). The 'salvation' being that of mankind. Therefore this date of 9/2017 is when these resurrected saints take their thrones and hence authority over earth, thus permamently ending satan's reign (ie. his minions being the last to be sent under). It means that Rev. 12, is happening at same time Rev. 20. Irvin baxter has done some work on showing that there is much overlap in revelations. He is easy to google (see 'the apocalpyse'). I see the entirety of Revelations as being about two foes battling it out. Satan on the one hand using a strong delusion (the 'how'; of it being another thread topic) to win earth and God martialing his troops of resurrected saints, to take him on. No rapture then, but a 7 year transition period called 'jacob's trouble' (which started may 9th, 2012....another topic) involving these saints new power structure winning over Satan. So...then what is this 'sign in the sky' pointing to Sept. 2017? I feel it is timing for a spiritual event, ie. the resurrected saints taking up their thrones (spiritual in nature thrones) and bringing peace to the land. So nothing much will occur, from a human perspective.
  8. As I first posted, the KJV is now wrong in regards to this one verse in Matthew. That is the example I used to illustrate that many such changes are occurring right now, in real time in the KJV (and to less extent, other versions of bible, without exception, ....ie. I have looked for myself at this for past week and a half and am overwelmed wth all the changed verses in every version now). I did not feel like taking on this much larger debate because it is controversial, so I am just referencing that one verse (and have posted no others here). Perhaps in time, it won't be and we can discuss it freely here.
  9. Re: Importance of KJV of Bible versus alternate versions Quote "Of the 89% of U.S. adults who own at least one Bible, 67% own a King James"*. From that same article "“It is hard to overstate the influence of the KJV,” he said." Title: "Bible readers prefer King James version" I prefer it as well, as a standard from which to compare other versions to Wingnut. Am not the only one. *https://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/religion/2011-04-21-king-james-bible.htm
  10. I am not quoting from that movie (someone asked for context for that verse, so I mentioned a scene in one movie that showed the series of actions of that night to help). Did not see any issue with that one scene in that one movie (not referencing entire mel gibson work). just to clarify
  11. I only use alternate versions of the bible, to translate the Kings James (not other way around). I do not see them as heritical though (ie. keeping you from being saved by Jesus from your transgressions). So is it a 'bad' translation? Probably just not very accurate.
  12. Cern has nothing to do with why the Kings James bible has been altered. God sent me a vision about 3 weeks ago that demonstrated Satan had changed time by taking people from the past and moving them foward in time, then back again. Date range 1890 to 1997. At that moment, I had read about time travel all over the net for 10 years, but had no proof. So I had to change how I saw things. I had to see how it all ties into the strong delusion of Revelations. How Irvin Baxter's work shows that the first trumpet sounded was WW 1 (can post that link, or just google "the apocalypse" and his name for said article/lecture). Giving us some proof as to 'when' Revelations edicts go into effect. We are not told in Revelations (it is therefore a mystery) how Satan suddenly can orchestrate a strong enough delusion to convince lukewarm Christians (ie. God's children) to turn from God, when it has never happen before. Just stating the obvious. He would need 'the upper hand' in order to 'take total control' over world. Continuing.... I then went to the net for information/proof and found more ties to those two dates I mentioned, 1880 and 1997 and time alterations/history being not the same as it was, between those two dates (very hapzardly I might add, obviously hard to nail down dates, but did so to my own satisfaction). Why is it relevant to look deeper at this one issue here? It is important to note changes in what we regard as permament, like the Kings James bible (and see alternatives to it, like using 1800 bibles that have stayed in our family, for example. As it is easy to fabricate false 1800 Bibles. Many have been, I've found). I do not see as many changes in other Bibles, but they are changing, just slower. I am not asking for belief. Just stating, i am listening to those concerned on this topic and seeking solutions (through prayer) from God now. So far, he has said "use 1800's KJV of the bible" (which came to me in prayer two nights ago). I spoke to one person on-line (Kat, who runs the "eya" channel") who says all bibles changed, in every year. Honestly, people will go too far to make a 'good show' on on-line because has she checked every copy out there or just what was at hand? Duh. So I have answered the "it was not man, but Satan and why" questions. But rather not go into it further here. Rather not provoke incident. Up to each of us to listen to God and follow. Bible or no, we still follow him. But we can at least try to salvage this situation. I like having an accurate Bible.
  13. Re: Meaning of verse changed I see this entire verse as setting up the metaphor that followers of Jesus are to remain viligilant, even unto death (ie. matryrdom, in this instance). That we as followers of Christ are to remain alert, and not go 'back to sleep'. It would be heresy for Jesus to defy God's wishes here and tell all his followers, then and now, to go ahead and 'sleep', while he gets arrested, then crucified (for their sins). Does that make sense then? That it is never too late to follow Jesus. Jesus even told one of the men, crucified next to him, that he was saved*. Obviously, never too late for God's good graces and forgiveness. *Luke 23:39-43 Christian Standard Bible "39 Then one of the criminals hanging there began to yell insults at[d] him: “Aren’t you the Messiah? Save yourself and us!” 40 But the other answered, rebuking him: “Don’t you even fear God,since you are undergoing the same punishment? 41 We are punished justly, because we’re getting back what we deserve for the things we did, but this man has done nothing wrong.” 42 Then he said, “Jesus, remember me[e] when you come into your kingdom.” 43 And he said to him, “Truly I tell you, today you will be with me in paradise.”
  14. Are you referring to my original post? No. My original post was based on another's research about that verse being altered from its original form, apparently. And my memory of what it originally said. AND my vision that God showed me (that a time travel event, commmitted by Satan, that changed history in order to create a "strong delusion"). I am not taking up the cause. Just stating that I am noting changes that affect the bible in such a dramatic way, I now have to attest, that changes have/are occurring regularly. Hard time catching up as the number of changes is getting rather large (but again, not bringing that up here on this thread. Just stating my reality).
  15. That comes (asking the holy spirit for guidance) with due diligence. Guidance and due diligence work hand in hand to serve God. Self study is always the key. Something people are not yet use to doing to this extent. We got use to having it easy, a Bible that we could attest too at hand. Now we are under assualt at our (Christianity) core, the KJV Bible. Because no matter what we say, we depend upon it for the word of God. Hearing God (of Abraham) direct has not yet occurred. We fell pull of holy spirit towards what God wants from us at this juncture. Note: I will add that God said to me yesterday that he will reveal himself (in time).