Anonymous Aristotle

Any woman that wants an abortion should have to pay out of pocket. Not put it on the tax payer .

Somewhere in Satan's back yard there are four demons that are missing. God be with the unborn. I have every sympathy for poor people needing health care. However when Satan says that he and his demons don't care about the suppression of unborn babies in the womb, but do care for irresponsible women who would rather sex than use protection that can save them from making an abortion choice. And save their lives from life taking STD's, my sympathy moves to the baby. God be with any woman who finds herself pregnant and facing a choice. And please God, let her choose life. So that the baby isn't oppressed by a scalpel cutting them apart while they can feel every bit of their own murder in the womb. Once a baby is born, a woman can choose to keep that baby. Or give them a chance at life with someone who cares. Otherwise, that woman can dodge moral compunction and responsibility and choose to conspire to murder her child. Their parts put in a red trash bag with insignia applied that rather than giving that dead baby a proper name, names them hazardous medical waste. God forbid.

And yet, the first amendment isn't inviolable. We can't yell a terrorist threat on an airplane. We can't scream fire in a crowded theater. We can't threaten the life of someone point blank claiming it is a first amendment speech right. And pedophiles should not have the right to traffic and prey in social media websites on the net, when they're not legally allowed to live next to a school. And when they have to register as a sex offender for life. It's contrary to logic for the law to say a pedophile has a legal right to speak on social media as an accessible hunting ground. But they're not legally allowed to walk to the fence of a school or park playground and speak to children.

I was listening to Beck on the radio this morning. They said that they believe he was on life support the whole time in north Korea. And that when he was going to fail that is when north Korea wanted him out of the country so an American didn't die in their custody while in a coma. That'll happen when a poor man is beaten near to death for allegedly trying to steal a poster. The evil that is north Korea is disheartening. I feel for the people who have to live under that darkness. And that they have to put their lives in jeopardy thinking to even try to find God's word to save them. May God move on north Korea soon.

Yahoo News June 19 ACLJ AUDIO Breaking: Potential Terror Attack in Paris. We discuss this and more today on the program

ACLJ National Security June 14 It’s an issue that shouldn’t be partisan. It shouldn’t matter who the President is. All Americans should praise the indictment of someone who leaks top-secret classified information and breaks the law while also making statements siding with Iran over the United States, saying she wanted to “burn the White House down.” Reality Leigh Winner, 25, a Federal Government contractor with top secret security clearance was charged with leaking classified U.S. intelligence documents after she allegedly removed classified materials from a Government agency and mailed them to a digital news outlet. Winner was a contractor with Pluribus International Corporation based at a government agency in Augusta, GA. A criminal complaint was filed in the Southern District of Georgia that charged Winner with leaking these classified documents to an online news outlet. The content of the leaks served as basis to an article published by a website known as The Intercept, which specializes in National Security reporting. The article published by The Intercept details a Russian military intelligence hacking effort days before the 2016 presidential election. [Continues]

I think if someone takes the trouble to find that thread reporting Ms.Griffins offense they'll see that there are posts that do not post so as to say they consider it way out of line at all.

Question: "What is the cause of the recent plague of child molestation incidents?" Answer: If you have not already, please read our article on pedophilia. While the Bible does not contain a detailed ranking of the wickedness of various sins, child molestation is surely near the top of the list. There is perhaps no more cruel, perverted, and loathsome sin than child molestation. Jesus consistently expressed compassion for children and anger toward anyone who would harm them (Matthew 19:14; Luke 17:1-2). While no sin is unforgivable, the evil of child molestation can only come from a warped and debauched heart and mind.But the question at hand is what is the cause of the recent plague of child molestation incidents. Sadly and disturbingly, it does seem that child molestation is becoming more common. Given scandals involving Roman Catholic priests, Protestant leaders, man-boy love societies, and incidents involving parents, teachers, pastors, coaches, etc., the word “plague” is an apt description. While there is no way to give a conclusive answer or find a universal cause of this child molestation plague, there are definitely biblical principles which apply.First, modern society is increasingly accepting of behaviors that the Bible declares to be sinful, immoral, and unnatural. While there is an enormous difference between child molestation and sexual acts involving consenting adults, the fact that society accepts behavior such as homosexuality allows people to consider far worse perversions of what God intended sex to be. And that leads to another question: why is society increasingly tolerant of aberrant behavior?Child molestation and other perversions are becoming increasingly accepted because society has, for the most part, rejected the Christian worldview. The conventional wisdom is that humanity is not created in the image of God. Rather, humanity is the result of billions of years of the random processes of evolution. God is not the objective standard of morality. Rather, God is supposedly the invention of weak-minded people who are unable to accept the fact that everything in this world is meaningless. There is also the possibility of demon possession as an explanation in some cases. Perhaps a sin so evil and twisted could only come from the minds of the most evil creatures, Satan and his horde of demons. Satan knows the damage that—apart from the miraculous healing of God—molestation does to a child. If Satan can destroy someone’s life during childhood, there is simply less work for him and his demons to do later. Satan desires to “devour” (1 Peter 5:8) and “steal, kill, and destroy” (John 10:10). What better way than by attacking the most vulnerable and impressionable of people?The rejection of the Christian worldview and the acceptance of a secular, naturalistic worldview leaves us with no absolute standard by which to declare child molestation to be evil. For generations, we have told people they are nothing but animals, so we should not be surprised if they begin to act like animals. If there is no absolute moral standard, then the “boundaries” people push are imaginary ones. Ultimately, child molestation is a result of people denying God and living their lives however they want.The Bible speaks of godless individuals who “suppress the truth,” saying, “Although they knew God, they neither glorified him as God nor gave thanks to him, but their thinking became futile and their foolish hearts were darkened. . . . Therefore God gave them over in the sinful desires of their hearts to sexual impurity for the degrading of their bodies with one another. They exchanged the truth about God for a lie. . . . Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. . . . They have become filled with every kind of wickedness, evil, greed and depravity. They are full of envy, murder, strife, deceit and malice. They are gossips, slanderers, God-haters, insolent, arrogant and boastful; they invent ways of doing evil . . . they have no understanding, no fidelity, no love, no mercy. Although they know God’s righteous decree that those who do such things deserve death, they not only continue to do these very things but also approve of those who practice them” (Romans 1:18-32).

Question: "What does the Bible say about pedophilia/paedophilia?" Answer: There is no direct mention of pedophilia in the Bible. But, there are numerous biblical principles that definitely apply to this perverted and abusive sin. One such principle is the Bible’s view of the sin of fornication. The word translated “fornication” has the same idea in both the Hebrew and the Greek. The Greek word is porneia, from which we get the English words porno and pornography. The word in Scripture refers to any illicit sexual activity, and this would have to include the abhorrent acts of a pedophile—including the gathering and trading of obscene or indecent pictures of young children. People who use this type of pornography usually graduate from looking to actually doing, bringing great harm to children. Fornication is among the “lusts of the flesh” (Galatians 5:16–21) and among the evil things that come from the heart of a man apart from God (Mark 7:21–23).Pedophiles share the characteristic of being “without natural affection” (Romans 1:31; 2 Timothy 3:2). The phrase “without natural affection” is translated from one Greek word, which means “inhuman, unloving, and unsociable.” One without natural affection acts in ways that are against the social norm. This would certainly describe a pedophile.In addition, there is a principle found in Jesus’ words about children. Jesus used a child to teach His disciples that childlike faith is necessary for entrance into the kingdom of heaven. At the same time, He said that the Father has concern for all of His “little ones” (Matthew 18:1–14). In that passage, Jesus says, “But whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea” (Matthew 18:6, KJV). The word offend in the Greek means “to cause one to stumble, to put a stumbling block or impediment in the way, upon which another may trip and fall, to entice to sin, or to cause a person to begin to distrust and desert one whom he ought to trust and obey.”These definitions of the word offend can easily be applied to the actions of a pedophile. Of course, the principle of not harming a child can be applied to a wide range of child-abusive actions, and Matthew 18:10 makes the case against anyone who would bring any type of harm to a child.

It is twisted. But it is not of God so that is to be expected when worldly judges side with Satan in this case. Remember when there was a movement that wanted to lower the drinking age from 21 to 18? The argument being, 18 year olds can join the military and learn how to use military grade weapons. But they can't buy a beer after training. When the homosexual marriage decision came through SCOTUS invoking the 14th amendment, almost immediately, I would say as I recall it was the next day, a threesome straight couple went to the town hall in their town seeking a marriage license. They intended to start the next activist wave in the sexual revolution by demanding polygamists have the same equal right to marry under the 14th. And following that SCOTUS decision WND saw the writing on the wall. And how could they not when the communist rooted/grounded ACLU sided with the Man Boy Love Association, a twisted men's group lobbying for the right to sexually assault children as a sexual orientation constitutional right in America, and that once actually enjoyed the privilege of a tax exempt status under the IRS, sought to force a ruling that child porn was a free speech right. So, WND published this article as a forewarning of things to come. This latest demonic SCOTUS ruling just puts another paving stone on that road to damnation . One that will no doubt be traveled by the NMBLA members, and others favoring pedophiles civil rights. WND EXCLUSIVE PEDOPHILIA THE NEXT 'SEXUAL-RIGHTS' REVOLUTION? Academics, psychologists expanding LGBT argument to 'minor-attracted persons' Published: 01/02/2014 Pedophilia is not curable. It is impossible to re-form the mind miswired so as to fire and cause the body of the pedophile to become sensually and sexually aroused at the thought, sight, touch , of a baby or child. It is as impossible to rewire as is heterosexuality. Because pedophilia is a sexual disorientation. A birth defect. And mentally ill people do not have a Constitutional right to exercise their sickness in a free society when they are a threat to themselves and others. That criteria of offense, threat to themselves or others, is one which permits those serving in the mental health profession to break client privilege if a patient demonstrates that intent. How then does SCOTUS give that mental illness its civil right to become a threat to children on-line using the avenue of social media as a means of expanding their hunting ground? Another option to remedy this demonic decision is to lobby Congress to amend the first amendment. Convicted pedophiles restricted from owning a computer or accessing the Internet. They're already restricted in housing options. And the sex offender registry insures by law that they are to make their presence known in those communities where they are allowed to reside. Starting with local law enforcement. I believe that should be expanded to include a sign posted in the offenders yard or on the door of their apartment or condo. The public disclosure act, as I would call it. This way children are safe. And they don't go to those doors on Halloween and stand to be abducted. The property is marked so families can insure their childrens safety. After all, in many states convicted felons 2nd amendment rights are vacated. How then does this SCOTUS think pedophiles have a first amendment right on-line?

One counter to this immoral ruling is to start writing Christian political and legal activist networks, and the president himself, as well as the Republican Representatives in our home states, and behind a copy of this ruling demand that pedophilia becomes a federal offense under federal law. Conviction mandatory life without parole. Retroactive to repeal all parole and probation orders surrounding all released offenders. Meanwhile, while working on that safety avenue, those of us in those 20 states that currently prosecute the sexual predator legislation demand it be prosecuted against all pedophiles released into the public domain currently . Those on parole and probation. This recent SCOTUS decision is inconsistent with SCOTUS prior ruling in Kansas v. Hendricks, 521 U.S. 346 (1997). Position Statement 55: Confining Sexual Predators in the Mental Health System When SCOTUS says it is allowable to have baby rapists and child predators preying on children in social media, when those not yet convicted or known are already doing that, and are the cause for children being abducted across America as news reports and even the former TV show, "To Catch A Predator", report. And uncover in their stings with regard to the TV show, parents and child advocates have to go on the offensive to defend against those who defend demons who hunt children.

How did men dress in Biblical times. Praise God I'm safe in my stash of Levis.

I would disagree that the impetus is freedom. No one is free to rape a child.

The correspondence would never allow for any doubt of that.

It did at first when I encountered this the few times I read here. Then it hit me. Non compose is a characteristic of the adversary of God. It all fits then.

I would never speak for another member however, I will observe that if defending the rights of pedophiles on-line doesn't get the offender in trouble, this site is already in peril. The irrational argument defense of child rapers , predators, rights on-line, the contempt and dismissal of law as a platform for that defense, is troubling. It sets the stage in fact being this reprehensible SCOTUS decision was predicated on the first amendment rights of child rapers and predators. While disparaging the rights of children to not to be stalked, attacked on-line, and pursued by child rapists and predators. And as such this decisions defenders allows for the inference in reading those defenders that they would also defend any pedophile avenue of assault as first amendment freedom. Namely, child porn. Because that falls within the parameters of offenders who disparage the law as a protective mediator between criminal child predators and the innocent in community.

That's a nonsensical excuse to pardon sponsorship of an avenue of predation of innocent children by child rapers and predators. I realize in the short time I've been a member here that there is an element that no matter what profiles as the antagonist toward righteousness. In this case, it is inexcusable. The nanny state axiom to defend the predation territory of pedophiles now legally extended to social media is vacant of credibility as is apparent to anyone who is not dedicated to offending Christian morals in a Christian forum. As is the argument that defends this decision by claiming parents are already warned if they were relying on law to keep their children safe on-line. That pardon is irrational because this decision insured children by law would not be safe on-line. While by law expanding the otherwise restricted rights of child rapers and predators in person in the general public domain. The failure compounds itself in the realm of irrationality when by law children are protected from parents that are pedophiles, physical abusers, murderers, through the jurisdiction afforded Child Protective Services. Guardian overseers for child welfare operating in every state in America. Defending the rights of child rapists is vulgar. And beneath any Christian. Irrational argument that the law cannot do that and thinking it could have, when it has protected children for generations, is the weakest avenue of antagonist method available. As yet. But it is early.

Parents here? Be warned.

What is very strange about that observation? The person you defend and those that align with his tactics in this thread and others pertaining to president Trump example that exact tactic you are hoping to attach to those Christians that rebut those tactics with facts. And kindness. Rather than with their sarcasm, rewording of written remarks so as to accuse the author of something they believe then needs defending after machined from that persons own imagination. A tactic to derail the pointed facts that destroy the false narrative those tacticians seem to promulgate in this and all threads pertaining to president Trump. And my pointing those facts out , as is apparent in the new tactician that has joined them and his agenda, will be assailed so as to make those to whom I am referring appear the victim. When in their pursuit we can all clearly read, truth concerning this matter and president Trump, is the victim. As they are part of the resistance. Which seeks to create a divide in America. And then scorch the Right side of what is cordoned off by their tactics.

That's just brilliant! Sex offenders can't attain residence within a certain distance of schools. But now they can come right into children's presence through the Internet. I think a few justices on SCOTUS should be made to retire. Kennedy said a few years ago in the Arizona immigration laws case that it really isn't illegal for illegal immigrants to enter and be in America. He was losing his mind then. This decision makes it seem as if it's barely there. Then again, his grandkids fall under a different rule of protection than the rest of ours.

As much corruption as was exampled by Comey, the FBI, Loretta Lynch and her department, I believe what they do know will never be released so as to hold Comey accountable for knowingly breaking the law.

May we take a moment away from this discussion to pray? June 20th Otto Warmbier, American student detained by N. Korea, has died God's mercy be with his soul.

Where are most of America's refugees coming from? UNHCR 2016 United Nations Refugee Agency U.S Department of State State Sponsors of Terrorism Share Countries determined by the Secretary of State to have repeatedly provided support for acts of international terrorism are designated pursuant to three laws: section 6(j) of the Export Administration Act, section 40 of the Arms Export Control Act, and section 620A of the Foreign Assistance Act. Taken together, the four main categories of sanctions resulting from designation under these authorities include restrictions on U.S. foreign assistance; a ban on defense exports and sales; certain controls over exports of dual use items; and miscellaneous financial and other restrictions. Designation under the above-referenced authorities also implicates other sanctions laws that penalize persons and countries engaging in certain trade with state sponsors. Currently there are three countries designated under these authorities: Iran, Sudan, and Syria. Country Designation Date Iran January 19, 1984 Sudan August 12, 1993 Syria December 29, 1979 For more details about State Sponsors of Terrorism, see "Overview of State Sponsored Terrorism" in Country Reports on Terrorism.

This may help them to understand Catholicism. the Vatican.Com CATECHISM OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH American Catholic What is the Catechism of the Catholic Church? By Santiago Cortes-Sjoberg ARTICLE When we talk about “the catechism” today we are most likely referring to the Catechism of the Catholic Church, promulgated by Pope John Paul II in 1992 to coincide with the 30th anniversary of the opening of the Second Vatican Council. For more than a decade bishops, theologians, and other experts worked on a “compendium of all Catholic doctrine regarding both faith and morals.” The fruit of their work was the catechism, an organized presentation of the essential teachings of the Catholic Church in regards to both faith and morals, “in the light of the Second Vatican Council and the whole of the church’s tradition.” The creation of an official, authoritative, and authentic reference text for teaching and transmitting Catholic doctrine was not new, however. In 1566 the so-called Roman Catechism was published in response to the request issued three years earlier by the Council of Trent. Used until 1978, it inspired, as intended, the creation of many national catechisms. Often these national catechisms were in a question-and-answer format, bringing to life the very meaning of the word catechism, derived from the Greek verb “to echo.” Students would, for centuries to come, repeat or echo the answers to the questions back to their teachers, who maybe hoped that the pupils would not only learn Catholic doctrine but echo the faith in their own lives. In the United States the most famous of these Q&A catechisms is the Baltimore Catechism. Issued by the Third Plenary Council of Baltimore in 1884 and used until at least 1962, its 421 questions and answers became ingrained in the minds of millions of U.S. Catholic grammar school students who grew up before the council. Although Catholics the world over flocked to purchase a copy of the 1992 edition (it became a best-seller), the catechism wasn’t intended for study and reflection by Catholics in general. Its intended readers are “those responsible for catechesis,” namely, bishops, priests, and catechists. In 2006 the U.S. bishops published the United States Catholic Catechism for Adults (USCCA), directed toward U.S. Catholics. Based on the CCC, it is written in light of the Catholic American experience and developed for the continuous formation and growth of adult Catholics. But neither catechism is meant to stand alone as the only reference for Catholic teaching. It only contains small sections of the actual documents it references. The church’s rich tradition, the Bible, and liturgy all illuminate each other and help us grow in faith, hope, and love. This article appeared in the July 2011 issue of U.S. Catholic (Vol. 76, No. 7, page 46)

Nine grandchildren? That's a lot of spoil-them-rotten responsibility you have in store for yourself. And as well, all those opportunities to be a kid again.