
Equippers
Diamond Member-
Posts
1,214 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by Equippers
-
About Supreme Court Justice Nominee Coney Barrett
Equippers replied to Omegaman 3.0's topic in U.S. Politics
well, since you are a Christian, why would you hold it against her for her Roman Catholic Faith or her Charismatic faith against her? -
About Supreme Court Justice Nominee Coney Barrett
Equippers replied to Omegaman 3.0's topic in U.S. Politics
i hope the Democrats will not be able to obstructs her confirmation. i think she is the surest bet to help push back attempt to encroach Christians' freedom to practice their faith. you can not really say that about other conservative judges. just look at what happened to Justice John Paul Stevens originally a conservative, became more and more liberal as time went by, until he became the head cheer leader for the liberal wing of the Supreme court! -
that is my point exactly. that the Democrats base hates him more than ever, and it will motivates Democrats voters turn out. part of me really want to see Trump kick Biden's butt this time, i am sick of people playing identity politics! Kamala anyone?
-
i just watched a video by David Rubin, in it he showed a clip that he says was from 2016 debate, where he asked Trump the same question and Trump was shown to have disavowed white supremacist already.....
-
actually, the appropriate chapter/passages would be Matthew 24 two that stood out are passage 9 where it says “Then you will be handed over to be persecuted and put to death, and you will be hated by all nations because of me. And passage 12 "Because of the increase of wickedness, the love of most will grow cold" if you are Christian , then you would know it is all about the increasing sinful state of the worse. What does medical advancement has anything to do with it? it has nothing to do with morality. So i am not sure why you would use this to support your point? because it is completely unrelated to what we are discussing here. no you did not ask me to provide examples in ANY of your previous posts. Please bear in mind that on this forum, when you edit a previous post, it will time stamp on the bottom. Anyway, i find it really interesting you said i have not provided an example. Because in mine post that come before your last post (the very same one you quoted), i have already provided a concrete example. anyway, so far you have not been specific on anything ( the best you could come up with was the advancement in medical technology, which like i have already pointed out, it is completely irrelevent to our discussion) so i will repost mine questions in this post again question 1 i would like you to be more specific by giving me an example of how in the past twenty years, the one philosophy have replace another question 2 why don't you start by telling me what you mean specifically by terms such as "improve society". how, specifically, are the SJW seek to improve society question 3 and also specifically, which groups, specifically are your refering to as marginalize and oppressed? looking forward to your response.
-
-
you keep using the vague notion of philosphy comes and goes to trying invalidate the concern i have raised to my "fellow Christians" the importance of recognizing what goes around us and do something about it. i have already pointed out why what you are saying is simply not true. not only like i have told you, the scripture predicted that things can only get worse but if you look at what has been happening in the past twenty years, the ungodly philosophies have proven what scripture has predicted. i will give a concrete example, it used be that people feel gays should be allowed to get married, but in recent years it has gotten more extreme to the point that anyone who disagree with with gay marriage are being called bigot, and increasingly people who can not get involved in gay weddings because of their faith are seen as being bigoted too. this conincide with the younger generations coming out of Universities where lecturers and professors are indoctrinate them with this kind of ideas, and they carries with them into other part of society such as media etc. so there, i have provided a concrete example from past twenty years that shows how social justice warriors are taking over the society and how, contrary to what you are claiming, the philosophies have not changed at all, it only gottten more extreme. anyway, i would like you to be more specific by giving me an example of how in the past twenty years, the one philosophy have replace another actually, why don't you start by telling me what you mean specifically by terms such as "improve society". how, specifically, are the SJW seek to improve society. and also specifically, which groups, specifically are your refering to as marginalize and oppressed? once i know specically what you mean, we can then have a discussion. but right now it seems to me you are just hiding behind bunch of vague terms.
-
hello you listed alot of allegations here agaisnt Matt Lauer. do you mind me asking where you read about those allegations? because in the video below, Katie Couric actually "says on camera" that many NBC executives have the same button, it is a perk of being an executive there, and the media try to make the button thing sounds neferious when it is not. Katie Couric also "says on camera" that during the time when she worked with Matt Lauer, he has always treated her with respect. i don't trust majority of the mainstream liberal media because they can lie and twist facts.
-
that is not what the scripture says. Scripture clearly tells us in the end of time, people will turn against God. And we see this very clearly in the developement in recent times. So don't try to tell me that somehow some magically new philiosophy would come on the horizons and replace the Ungodly ones.
-
are you familiar with the case with Canadian writer Steven Galloway? one of his former student made a allegation against him, her words was taken at face value by many of his colleagues, he lost his job, reputation ruined and attempted suicide at least once after an independent investigation, the woman was found lying. Not only that, it was not the first time that made this kind of allegation. The first time she did it, without evidence, a man lost a job opportunity. https://quillette.com/2018/06/21/a-literary-inquisition-how-novelist-steven-galloway-was-smeared-as-a-rapist-even-as-the-case-against-him-collapsed/ https://nationalpost.com/opinion/steven-galloway-in-his-own-words-exclusive the point is the metoo movement tries to get people to ignore a fundamental legal principle of a person is innocent until proven guilty. they are also trying to get rid of due process as well this whole idea of take a woman's allegation at their words is repugnant to me. yes, any woman who comes forward with an allegation need to be heard, and taken seriously. but it also need to be investigated thoroughly, and an allegation need to be treated as an allegation until it is proven by evidence and due process. any attempt to bypass those is disgusting.
-
what evidences are there to back up her statement? i think it might be possible that Matt may have sexually harassed some of the women, but rape? i doubt it again, in the age of metoo, women can basically make any kind of allegations without evidences and it would be believed. if she was raped, she would have gone to the police a long long time again.
-
in Ronan book, the woman claimed Matt Lauer "raped" her yet in the article from 2017 https://www.usmagazine.com/celebrity-news/news/matt-lauer-fired-by-nbc-amid-sexual-misconduct-allegations/ the statement released by NBC stated “Dear colleagues, on Monday night, we received a detailed complaint from a colleague about inappropriate sexual behavior in the workplace by Matt Lauer,” to me, "inappropriate sexual behaviors" and "rape" are two different things yet no recent reports in the liberal medias seem to include this inconsistency
-
i have been paying attention to this for a while now. i am sure many of you probably know, the radical left have pretty much taken over many campuses in the US, both in the student body, but more concerning, the faculty. I remember i came across this interview once, where the person being interviewed was a college professor, and he/she said something i never forgot. This person said in his/her experience, what goes on on college campus today is an accurate indicator of what the society will be like tomorrow. i also remember watching this interview with Christina Hoff Sommers (if you don't know who she is, i strongly recommend you check her out on youtube), she was talking about not only the left have basically taken over the faculty in many colleges, but they see their jobs as indoctrinate their students to create next generation of social justice warriors. all these just means students in social sciences are being indoctrinated with far left ideas, and then they will go on to occupy every level of society. So some of them will become journalists, responsible for shaping public perceptions on issues. Some of them will become legislators and lawmakers, shaping laws and legislations. Some of them will become administrators in different organizations, shaping organization policies and upholding them, including policies of non discriminations (such as non discriminations for Christians). And many of them will go on to be educators at all levels (high school, college) and are responsible for shaping young minds. The examples just goes on and on. Hence what college is like today is a good indicator of what the society will be like tomorrow. have you guys thought about what is going to happen in the next twenty years, once all these SJWs graduated from college and go on to occupy positions all across society? what implications it will have for you and your children, who are Christians?
-
well, i think protesting and riots are two completely different things riots is never justified. but in a democracy, people have and should have the right to peacefully protests. if there is no mass protests on what happened, i very much doubt the police would be fired, much less charged. And i don't think there would be fundamental changes made to how polices do their jobs either.