MorningGlory Posted October 15, 2009 Group: Royal Member Followers: 0 Topic Count: 1,022 Topics Per Day: 0.16 Content Count: 39,193 Content Per Day: 6.06 Reputation: 9,977 Days Won: 78 Joined: 10/01/2006 Status: Offline Share Posted October 15, 2009 Killing 600,000 Cambodians seems to fit that category fairly well, perhaps you would prefer to class it as incidental genocide as his primary aim was geopolitical and the half a million dead peasants was merely a bi-product of that. Not so different from Stalin's equally misguided attempts to oil the cogs of social change with peasant blood Oh horsefeathers! Where do you get your history anyway? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Believer1997 Posted October 19, 2009 Group: Royal Member Followers: 1 Topic Count: 66 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 6,363 Content Per Day: 1.12 Reputation: 119 Days Won: 9 Joined: 11/07/2008 Status: Offline Share Posted October 19, 2009 yes, he did.... awhile back wasn't it? last week, week before? Time just flies... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burning_Ember Posted October 19, 2009 Group: Diamond Member Followers: 0 Topic Count: 21 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 2,009 Content Per Day: 0.29 Reputation: 100 Days Won: 3 Joined: 09/20/2005 Status: Offline Share Posted October 19, 2009 America should take some pride in winning such a prestigious prize, again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Believer1997 Posted October 19, 2009 Group: Royal Member Followers: 1 Topic Count: 66 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 6,363 Content Per Day: 1.12 Reputation: 119 Days Won: 9 Joined: 11/07/2008 Status: Offline Share Posted October 19, 2009 I would have more pride in it if the recipient had done something besides giving speeches to earn it. If he had been instrumental in bringing about global peace or done something besides talking.. talking... talking ... it may have been a bit more prestigious and noteworthy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest yod Posted October 20, 2009 Share Posted October 20, 2009 This is a cruel joke. My friends in Germany (many of whom had been Obama fans) are perplexed. This just in: Obama wins an Oscar for his portrayal of a President! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest LadyC Posted October 20, 2009 Share Posted October 20, 2009 haha, you're right, it is a cruel joke... his portrayal of a president has not been oscar worthy! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts