Jump to content
IGNORED

WN: Transferring oil from broken well an option for BP - AP


WorthyNewsBot

Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Bots
  • Followers:  3
  • Topic Count:  39,879
  • Topics Per Day:  6.45
  • Content Count:  44,425
  • Content Per Day:  7.19
  • Reputation:   986
  • Days Won:  2
  • Joined:  06/06/2007
  • Status:  Offline

The first of two relief wells being drilled to stop the Gulf oil gusher could be done by the end of the month, BP officials say, but if that doesn't succeed, one backup being considered is transferring the crude to non-producing underwater wells that are miles away.

http://www.worthynews.com/top/breitbart-com-print-php-id-D9GRCP4O0/

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  5
  • Topic Count:  827
  • Topics Per Day:  0.10
  • Content Count:  12,101
  • Content Per Day:  1.50
  • Reputation:   249
  • Days Won:  3
  • Joined:  04/01/2002
  • Status:  Offline

Honestly, if the original well had so many problems, from early on apparently, from working at such great depths, then how can two more wells be any different? They Have to drill to the same depth to reach the oil, at the same pressures, with the same equipment, and the same bungling company - who knew early on there was a terrible problem. How will it be any different this time?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  1,022
  • Topics Per Day:  0.16
  • Content Count:  39,193
  • Content Per Day:  6.10
  • Reputation:   9,977
  • Days Won:  78
  • Joined:  10/01/2006
  • Status:  Offline

Honestly, if the original well had so many problems, from early on apparently, from working at such great depths, then how can two more wells be any different? They Have to drill to the same depth to reach the oil, at the same pressures, with the same equipment, and the same bungling company - who knew early on there was a terrible problem. How will it be any different this time?

Good question. That's the classic definitition of insanity, as we all know; doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result. :laugh:

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  4
  • Topic Count:  1,285
  • Topics Per Day:  0.16
  • Content Count:  17,917
  • Content Per Day:  2.27
  • Reputation:   355
  • Days Won:  19
  • Joined:  10/01/2002
  • Status:  Offline

Actually, the two new wells are going straight down about 12,000 feet and then going it at a slight angle to 18,000 feet to tap into the existing well. They are not actually new wells. They are only coming at the current well from both sides and angling in to tap into the ciurrent structure below the blowout preventer. This will enable them to pump heavy mud and concrete, eventually, into the pipes in hopes of capping it.

The article talks about if that techiique fails that they can release the oil into several older wells that are dry for storage. :laugh:

Sounds a little stupid to me to plug and cap the thing if it's useful after being tapped into. :blink:

I don't really think anyone has a plan that's viable. This angle and tap thing is sketchy and no one will say with any certainty that it will work. :24:

I'm going to say something controversial now. :P I don't think President Obama cares one wit whether it's capped or not. It fit's into his agenda nicely and thus far has been a distraction. He wants oil exploration and drilling cut off. Just yesterday another Court upheld the Law, which is very imporatant in these days of tyranny, and refused to allow the current ban on drilling to stay in force. Guess what the Obama Admin. did? They immediately stated that they will seek to enforce yet another form of the same ban. :P

Obama see's $7.00 a gallon gas as a foregone conclussion. :cool: He has no problem with that whatsoever he even said so during the Election.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...