Guest shiloh357 Posted December 16, 2010 Share Posted December 16, 2010 The author of the article is really reaching on this one. One fact that he gets wrong is that there were not 38 translators on the KJV. There were 52. They were not commissioned to put the Bible in Englsh. It was already in English. The KJV was seventh English revision. This was just a crazed lunatic. It has no prophetic significance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hunterpoet Posted December 16, 2010 Group: Removed from Forums for Breaking Terms of Service Followers: 0 Topic Count: 128 Topics Per Day: 0.02 Content Count: 2,704 Content Per Day: 0.44 Reputation: 25 Days Won: 1 Joined: 05/29/2007 Status: Offline Birthday: 10/08/1950 Share Posted December 16, 2010 Now, I watched that video several times and I barely saw the womens purse. How are you able to discern the material. Was there a later discussion and close up of the purse that I missed?? I saw this on-line yesterday. the incident with the purse happened before the tape showing him shooting. You see the woman leaving by the side door, you see him standing in front of that side door with his back turned to the door, you see the woman coming back in and swinging the purse at him. He turns around and takes her down, but he lets her go instead of shooting her. This is exactly what I saw...but were you able to actually see the purse well enough to determine the material it was made of.....that is my question Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Believer1997 Posted December 16, 2010 Group: Royal Member Followers: 1 Topic Count: 66 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 6,363 Content Per Day: 1.13 Reputation: 119 Days Won: 9 Joined: 11/07/2008 Status: Offline Share Posted December 16, 2010 Now, I watched that video several times and I barely saw the womens purse. How are you able to discern the material. Was there a later discussion and close up of the purse that I missed?? I saw this on-line yesterday. the incident with the purse happened before the tape showing him shooting. You see the woman leaving by the side door, you see him standing in front of that side door with his back turned to the door, you see the woman coming back in and swinging the purse at him. He turns around and takes her down, but he lets her go instead of shooting her. This is exactly what I saw...but were you able to actually see the purse well enough to determine the material it was made of.....that is my question There was a news conference and the lady held up her purse and her colleagues were joking about filling it with bricks... it was a faux vinyl bag that had squares of alligator type design. I think people can create something "prophetic" when nothing prophetic exists... the man was sick and needed to be getting psychiatric care. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hunterpoet Posted December 16, 2010 Group: Removed from Forums for Breaking Terms of Service Followers: 0 Topic Count: 128 Topics Per Day: 0.02 Content Count: 2,704 Content Per Day: 0.44 Reputation: 25 Days Won: 1 Joined: 05/29/2007 Status: Offline Birthday: 10/08/1950 Share Posted December 16, 2010 Now, I watched that video several times and I barely saw the womens purse. How are you able to discern the material. Was there a later discussion and close up of the purse that I missed?? I saw this on-line yesterday. the incident with the purse happened before the tape showing him shooting. You see the woman leaving by the side door, you see him standing in front of that side door with his back turned to the door, you see the woman coming back in and swinging the purse at him. He turns around and takes her down, but he lets her go instead of shooting her. This is exactly what I saw...but were you able to actually see the purse well enough to determine the material it was made of.....that is my question There was a news conference and the lady held up her purse and her colleagues were joking about filling it with bricks... it was a faux vinyl bag that had squares of alligator type design. I think people can create something "prophetic" when nothing prophetic exists... the man was sick and needed to be getting psychiatric care. OK that explains it...I missed that interview.....yes the shooter was a sick man, but it was Da servant that stated an " indirect reference " to satan because the hand bag was an " alligator type " material.....never heard that before and was wondering how Da servant came to that knowledge. i don't know of any scripture that makes that inference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Believer1997 Posted December 16, 2010 Group: Royal Member Followers: 1 Topic Count: 66 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 6,363 Content Per Day: 1.13 Reputation: 119 Days Won: 9 Joined: 11/07/2008 Status: Offline Share Posted December 16, 2010 Now, I watched that video several times and I barely saw the womens purse. How are you able to discern the material. Was there a later discussion and close up of the purse that I missed?? I saw this on-line yesterday. the incident with the purse happened before the tape showing him shooting. You see the woman leaving by the side door, you see him standing in front of that side door with his back turned to the door, you see the woman coming back in and swinging the purse at him. He turns around and takes her down, but he lets her go instead of shooting her. This is exactly what I saw...but were you able to actually see the purse well enough to determine the material it was made of.....that is my question There was a news conference and the lady held up her purse and her colleagues were joking about filling it with bricks... it was a faux vinyl bag that had squares of alligator type design. I think people can create something "prophetic" when nothing prophetic exists... the man was sick and needed to be getting psychiatric care. OK that explains it...I missed that interview.....yes the shooter was a sick man, but it was Da servant that stated an " indirect reference " to satan because the hand bag was an " alligator type " material.....never heard that before and was wondering how Da servant came to that knowledge. i don't know of any scripture that makes that inference. Nor do I, Hunter. Has the OP explained or given reference for his supposition? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hunterpoet Posted December 17, 2010 Group: Removed from Forums for Breaking Terms of Service Followers: 0 Topic Count: 128 Topics Per Day: 0.02 Content Count: 2,704 Content Per Day: 0.44 Reputation: 25 Days Won: 1 Joined: 05/29/2007 Status: Offline Birthday: 10/08/1950 Share Posted December 17, 2010 Now, I watched that video several times and I barely saw the womens purse. How are you able to discern the material. Was there a later discussion and close up of the purse that I missed?? I saw this on-line yesterday. the incident with the purse happened before the tape showing him shooting. You see the woman leaving by the side door, you see him standing in front of that side door with his back turned to the door, you see the woman coming back in and swinging the purse at him. He turns around and takes her down, but he lets her go instead of shooting her. This is exactly what I saw...but were you able to actually see the purse well enough to determine the material it was made of.....that is my question There was a news conference and the lady held up her purse and her colleagues were joking about filling it with bricks... it was a faux vinyl bag that had squares of alligator type design. I think people can create something "prophetic" when nothing prophetic exists... the man was sick and needed to be getting psychiatric care. OK that explains it...I missed that interview.....yes the shooter was a sick man, but it was Da servant that stated an " indirect reference " to satan because the hand bag was an " alligator type " material.....never heard that before and was wondering how Da servant came to that knowledge. i don't know of any scripture that makes that inference. Nor do I, Hunter. Has the OP explained or given reference for his supposition? not yet Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Da Servant Posted December 17, 2010 Group: Junior Member Followers: 1 Topic Count: 34 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 109 Content Per Day: 0.02 Reputation: 15 Days Won: 0 Joined: 05/31/2009 Status: Offline Author Share Posted December 17, 2010 Now, I watched that video several times and I barely saw the womens purse. How are you able to discern the material. Was there a later discussion and close up of the purse that I missed?? I saw this on-line yesterday. the incident with the purse happened before the tape showing him shooting. You see the woman leaving by the side door, you see him standing in front of that side door with his back turned to the door, you see the woman coming back in and swinging the purse at him. He turns around and takes her down, but he lets her go instead of shooting her. This is exactly what I saw...but were you able to actually see the purse well enough to determine the material it was made of.....that is my question There was a news conference and the lady held up her purse and her colleagues were joking about filling it with bricks... it was a faux vinyl bag that had squares of alligator type design. I think people can create something "prophetic" when nothing prophetic exists... the man was sick and needed to be getting psychiatric care. OK that explains it...I missed that interview.....yes the shooter was a sick man, but it was Da servant that stated an " indirect reference " to satan because the hand bag was an " alligator type " material.....never heard that before and was wondering how Da servant came to that knowledge. i don't know of any scripture that makes that inference. The indirect reference to Satan is dealing with the alligator-type material. The Bible identifies Satan as a dragon of Egypt and Leviathan in Job. Alligators are sometimes mistaken for crocodiles, a type of dragon. One must remember that at least most dragons do not fly nor breathe fire. I put that in there to help people out with studying the Bible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Da Servant Posted December 17, 2010 Group: Junior Member Followers: 1 Topic Count: 34 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 109 Content Per Day: 0.02 Reputation: 15 Days Won: 0 Joined: 05/31/2009 Status: Offline Author Share Posted December 17, 2010 The author of the article is really reaching on this one. One fact that he gets wrong is that there were not 38 translators on the KJV. There were 52. They were not commissioned to put the Bible in Englsh. It was already in English. The KJV was seventh English revision. This was just a crazed lunatic. It has no prophetic significance. Thank you for the correction on the number of translators. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Da Servant Posted December 17, 2010 Group: Junior Member Followers: 1 Topic Count: 34 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 109 Content Per Day: 0.02 Reputation: 15 Days Won: 0 Joined: 05/31/2009 Status: Offline Author Share Posted December 17, 2010 Now, I watched that video several times and I barely saw the womens purse. How are you able to discern the material. Was there a later discussion and close up of the purse that I missed?? I saw this on-line yesterday. the incident with the purse happened before the tape showing him shooting. You see the woman leaving by the side door, you see him standing in front of that side door with his back turned to the door, you see the woman coming back in and swinging the purse at him. He turns around and takes her down, but he lets her go instead of shooting her. This is exactly what I saw...but were you able to actually see the purse well enough to determine the material it was made of.....that is my question How I got the alligator-like material the purse was made from was the story on huffingtonpost.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
josephine tomczuk Posted December 17, 2010 Group: Advanced Member Followers: 0 Topic Count: 11 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 169 Content Per Day: 0.03 Reputation: 21 Days Won: 3 Joined: 10/04/2010 Status: Offline Share Posted December 17, 2010 The author of the article is really reaching on this one. One fact that he gets wrong is that there were not 38 translators on the KJV. There were 52. They were not commissioned to put the Bible in Englsh. It was already in English. The KJV was seventh English revision. This was just a crazed lunatic. It has no prophetic significance. hi, i see no reason to doubt you, just wondering where you got that info from:) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts