The_Patriot21 Posted November 27, 2012 Group: Worthy Ministers Followers: 27 Topic Count: 338 Topics Per Day: 0.05 Content Count: 15,715 Content Per Day: 2.45 Reputation: 8,535 Days Won: 39 Joined: 10/25/2006 Status: Online Birthday: 02/27/1985 Share Posted November 27, 2012 debating the health effects-real or imagined-is a side effect, because, regardless of whether the "shot" has any negative side effects, theyre obviously so minimal to be non-existent, seeing how many people take the flu shot every year without any bad side effects, and it is accepted as healthy by the medical community at large, and as such for a health company to require them is not unreasonable, illegal, nor trampling on peoples rights. The question, isnt about whether a certain "vaccine" is good or bad for you, the question is whether the company has the right to require it or not-and the fact of the matter is they do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
other one Posted November 27, 2012 Group: Worthy Ministers Followers: 29 Topic Count: 599 Topics Per Day: 0.08 Content Count: 56,260 Content Per Day: 7.56 Reputation: 27,988 Days Won: 271 Joined: 12/29/2003 Status: Offline Share Posted November 27, 2012 if a person gets the flu and transmits that to someone else who comes into that office, is the company liable for the action of the person refusing to have the vaccine which could have kept the person from developing the flu in the first place. Since there are so many people who die from the complications caused by the flu, this is not a frivolous thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest man Posted November 27, 2012 Share Posted November 27, 2012 I've never had a flu shot nor do I plan on having one. I used to feel the same way until one year I got the flu. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts