Netanyahu says relationship with Obama no bearing on Iran deal

[Guest shiloh357]

There's nothing "evil" about that at all.   In fact, its one good reason why Israel hasn't been invaded.   Those nukes and the certifiable threat of mutually assured destruction is a principle that the US adheres to. 

[thereselittleflower]

Mutual assured destruction between the US and Russia, where both had superior levels of nuclear arms, finds no such counterpart to Israel in the Middle East.

 

 

This is nothing like Israel planning to attack countries that aren't attacking it and taking out an entire region, known as the Samsom Option in which even Europe was threatened.

 

Seeing defense of such blood thirsty intent by those who name the name of Christ is very disturbing.

Edited July 15, 2015 by thereselittleflower

[Guest shiloh357]

Sure it does.   Israel is surrounded by over 1 billion maniacal enemies.  Israel is a nation of six million Jews and as such is out numbered  more than 100 to 1 on the battlefield.   If Israel ever gets to the point that they cannot defend themselves, the nuclear option is their last resort, called "Operation Samson"  where Sampson took his enemies with him which he requested from God.

 

So the nukes offset Israel's numerical disadvantage and provide a mutually assured destruction deterrent to invasion.   

 

It's good thing, not an evil thing (unless you hate Israel).

[thereselittleflower]

So you believe it is a good thing for Israel to target and attack nations that aren't attacking Israel simply because it appears Israel is going to lose a fight with someone else?  An attack, the shear size of which,  Israel itself has said will most likely destroy life on earth?

Edited July 15, 2015 by thereselittleflower

[Guest shiloh357]

When Israel was attacked in 1948 in an Arab bid to wipe Israel out on its first day of existence, Israel was attacked by six Arab nations.  However, those nations were supplied by the rest of the Arab world with extra troops, arms, ammunition, uniforms, supplies money, etc.  So when Israel was attacked it was actually unified effort by the Arab world, not just six nations.

 

In the other wars Israel had to defend itself in, Israel was not just fighting the actual armies on the fields, but they were fighting other nations that were bolstering, re-supplying and re-enforcing the enemy nations.

 

In that kind of situation, yes, a nuke strike would be appropriate and that is why the Arab nations don't have the courage to invade Israel.   Once Israel gained nukes and the Arab knew of it, the ongoing attempts at using military force to destroy Israel stopped.  

 

So yes, the nuke option is a good thing, especially for Israel and I support it.  

[thereselittleflower]

To be clear, The Samson Option being spoken of is this:

 

'We possess several hundred atomic warheads and rockets and can launch them at targets in all directions, perhaps even at Rome. Most European capitals are targets for our air force………. Israel must be like a mad dog, too dangerous to bother….. Our armed forces, however, are not the thirtieth strongest in the world, but rather the second or third. We have the capability to take the world down with us. And I can assure you that that will happen, before Israel goes under."

[ayin jade]

When several countries threaten to wipe israel off the map, what should israel do? When several govts have the sole purpose of destroying israel, what would you have israel do? When its citizens are repeatedly bombed by hundreds of thousands of bombs over decades, what would you have israel do?

[thereselittleflower]

My question is being avoided.

 

Do you believe it is a good thing for Israel to target and attack nations that aren't attacking Israel simply because it appears Israel is going to lose a fight with someone else?   - an attack, the shear size of which,  Israel itself has said, has the capability of taking the world with it?

[ayin jade]

To be clear, The Samson Option being spoken of is this:

 

'We possess several hundred atomic warheads and rockets and can launch them at targets in all directions, perhaps even at Rome. Most European capitals are targets for our air force………. Israel must be like a mad dog, too dangerous to bother….. Our armed forces, however, are not the thirtieth strongest in the world, but rather the second or third. We have the capability to take the world down with us. And I can assure you that that will happen, before Israel goes under."

 

 

I couldnt find that on a single credible site except one, and even that quoted something else entirely. Where is this from?

[ayin jade]

My question is being avoided.

 

Do you believe it is a good thing for Israel to target and attack nations that aren't attacking Israel simply because it appears Israel is going to lose a fight with someone else?   - an attack, the shear size of which,  Israel itself has said, has the capability of taking the world with it?

 

Nations are attacking israel. Who supplies hamas etc with money and weapons to attack israeli citizens?

 

Since the world is permitting someone who has vowed to destroy israel to have nuclear weapons, what should israel do to defend itself? What should israel do to stop the attacks already happening to it? What do you see as a good plan for the middle east?