Guest Posted April 8, 2017 Share Posted April 8, 2017 3 hours ago, worthy said: Who runs snopes? The same people who owned it a couple of weeks ago when Snopes was used to prove me wrong and shut down a thread I started. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kindle Posted April 8, 2017 Group: Royal Member Followers: 53 Topic Count: 88 Topics Per Day: 0.03 Content Count: 4,064 Content Per Day: 1.35 Reputation: 3,748 Days Won: 8 Joined: 02/23/2016 Status: Offline Share Posted April 8, 2017 10 minutes ago, JaniceR said: The same people who owned it a couple of weeks ago when Snopes was used to prove me wrong and shut down a thread I started. Janice,I am not asking for that reason. I want to know in general. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted April 9, 2017 Share Posted April 9, 2017 8 minutes ago, worthy said: Janice,I am not asking for that reason. I want to know in general. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snopes.com Snopes.com was created by Barbara and David Mikkelson, a California couple who met in the alt.folklore.urban newsgroup.[7]  Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kindle Posted April 9, 2017 Group: Royal Member Followers: 53 Topic Count: 88 Topics Per Day: 0.03 Content Count: 4,064 Content Per Day: 1.35 Reputation: 3,748 Days Won: 8 Joined: 02/23/2016 Status: Offline Share Posted April 9, 2017 2 minutes ago, JaniceR said: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snopes.com Snopes.com was created by Barbara and David Mikkelson, a California couple who met in the alt.folklore.urban newsgroup.[7]  Thank you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest shiloh357 Posted April 9, 2017 Share Posted April 9, 2017 27 minutes ago, Davida said: So why is not the major networks running all over like a pack of blood hounds at this news? Probably for the same reason that MSM tried to bury the story on Susan Rice and the unmasking the week it came out. They tried not to run the story at all, but eventually had no choice.    They have done the same thing in the past multiple times.  either they don't cover the story at all, or they give minimal coverage to it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
angels4u Posted April 9, 2017 Group: Worthy Ministers Followers: 55 Topic Count: 1,664 Topics Per Day: 0.20 Content Count: 19,764 Content Per Day: 2.38 Reputation: 12,164 Days Won: 28 Joined: 08/22/2001 Status: Offline Share Posted April 9, 2017 By the way ,did anybody see the movie from Ben Carson "Gifted hands?" The movie is amazing... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kindle Posted April 9, 2017 Group: Royal Member Followers: 53 Topic Count: 88 Topics Per Day: 0.03 Content Count: 4,064 Content Per Day: 1.35 Reputation: 3,748 Days Won: 8 Joined: 02/23/2016 Status: Offline Share Posted April 9, 2017 1 minute ago, angels4u said: By the way ,did anybody see the movie from Ben Carson "Gifted hands?" The movie is amazing... Yep,Just watched it again yesterday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Patriot21 Posted April 9, 2017 Group: Worthy Ministers Followers: 27 Topic Count: 338 Topics Per Day: 0.05 Content Count: 15,727 Content Per Day: 2.45 Reputation: 8,542 Days Won: 39 Joined: 10/25/2006 Status: Offline Birthday: 02/27/1985 Share Posted April 9, 2017 Thing is the number most likely is exaggerated... however, looking at the Snopes article, did anyone notice how it "conveniently" claimed the audit took place before Carson took over? Knowing full well any official worth their money is going to audit any agency they are just given control over so that they know what they have available for assets, they really expect us to believe that Carson's predecessor did that on purpose to expose their mistakes willingly to Carson? Snopes is getting more and more unbelievable every day. I miss the time when they actually were reputable. Or at least somewhat believable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kindle Posted April 9, 2017 Group: Royal Member Followers: 53 Topic Count: 88 Topics Per Day: 0.03 Content Count: 4,064 Content Per Day: 1.35 Reputation: 3,748 Days Won: 8 Joined: 02/23/2016 Status: Offline Share Posted April 9, 2017 31 minutes ago, The_Patriot2017 said: Thing is the number most likely is exaggerated... however, looking at the Snopes article, did anyone notice how it "conveniently" claimed the audit took place before Carson took over? Knowing full well any official worth their money is going to audit any agency they are just given control over so that they know what they have available for assets, they really expect us to believe that Carson's predecessor did that on purpose to expose their mistakes willingly to Carson? Snopes is getting more and more unbelievable every day. I miss the time when they actually were reputable. Or at least somewhat believable. Yes I did notice that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danger Noodle Posted April 9, 2017 Group: Senior Member Followers: 5 Topic Count: 15 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 573 Content Per Day: 0.22 Reputation: 329 Days Won: 0 Joined: 03/27/2017 Status: Offline Share Posted April 9, 2017 17 hours ago, Davida said: So why is not the major networks running all over like a pack of blood hounds at this news? June 2012 These 6 Corporations Control 90% Of The Media In America   13 hours ago, The_Patriot2017 said: Thing is the number most likely is exaggerated... however, looking at the Snopes article, did anyone notice how it "conveniently" claimed the audit took place before Carson took over? Knowing full well any official worth their money is going to audit any agency they are just given control over so that they know what they have available for assets, they really expect us to believe that Carson's predecessor did that on purpose to expose their mistakes willingly to Carson? Snopes is getting more and more unbelievable every day. I miss the time when they actually were reputable. Or at least somewhat believable. Yes, it is noticeable. But that the audit took place prior and was then updated demonstrates by the auditors themselves prior to Dr.Carson's arrival something was known to be amiss in the bookkeeping.  The entire Snopes article supports Dr.Carson's bringing the findings to public attention. As is his responsibility. Even Snopes themselves admit as much here: Quote The total dollar figure noted in the report — roughly $520 billion — is undeniably a very large amount of money (equivalent to approximately 13% of the entire 2015 federal budget). But the OIG report explains that figure was the absolute value of all numeric corrections made to HUD financial records, meaning all numeric adjustments (whether positive or negative) were added to create that aggregate figure.  Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts