Jump to content
IGNORED

The Problem With Evolution Part 2- Animals


Starise

Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  3
  • Topic Count:  27
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  5,197
  • Content Per Day:  0.68
  • Reputation:   994
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  06/20/2003
  • Status:  Offline

3 hours ago, FreeGrace said:

Evolution explains a very slow process of the development of animals that leads finally to man.  That is unbiblical. 

It's contrary to some modern interpretations of Genesis.  But it's not contrary to Genesis.

4 hours ago, BeyondET said:

And the problem with evolution and animals?

There isn't one, if you simply take scripture as it is.  

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  4
  • Topic Count:  10
  • Topics Per Day:  0.02
  • Content Count:  4,649
  • Content Per Day:  7.96
  • Reputation:   631
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  11/07/2022
  • Status:  Offline

2 hours ago, The Barbarian said:

FreeGrace said: 

Evolution explains a very slow process of the development of animals that leads finally to man.  That is unbiblical. 

It's contrary to some modern interpretations of Genesis.  But it's not contrary to Genesis.

Sure it is.  There aren't any centuries in Genesis 1, much less years, other than the unspecified time it took for the earth to become an uninhabitable wasteland.

And then the restoration began.  Took 6 days total.  

2 hours ago, The Barbarian said:

There isn't one, if you simply take scripture as it is.  

I take Scripture exactly as written.  And I understand what the words mean by comparing how they were used in the other verses in the OT.

All very clear.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  3
  • Topic Count:  27
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  5,197
  • Content Per Day:  0.68
  • Reputation:   994
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  06/20/2003
  • Status:  Offline

Evolution is contrary to some modern interpretations of Genesis.  But it's not contrary to Genesis.

26 minutes ago, FreeGrace said:

Sure it is.  There aren't any centuries in Genesis 1,

But there are mornings and evenings with no sun with which to have them, so the text itself says it's not a literal account.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  4
  • Topic Count:  10
  • Topics Per Day:  0.02
  • Content Count:  4,649
  • Content Per Day:  7.96
  • Reputation:   631
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  11/07/2022
  • Status:  Offline

1 hour ago, The Barbarian said:

Evolution is contrary to some modern interpretations of Genesis.  But it's not contrary to Genesis.

  FreeGrace said: 

Sure it is.  There aren't any centuries in Genesis 1,

But there are mornings and evenings with no sun with which to have them, so the text itself says it's not a literal account.

If mornings and evenings require the sun, and there isn't a sun, then how can the Bible describe "morning and evening"?  

We know from Rev 21 that the new heaven and earth won't need the sun because the Father and Son provide the light.  So I have no problem with 24 hour days without a sun.  

The bigger issue is how "tohu wabohu" was used in the other 2 passages.  In Jer 4:23 the phrase was used to describe what a besieging army did to the land (total destruction) and in Isa 34:11 it was used to describe God Himself destroying the land.

So there is no reason for the phrase in Gen 1:2 mean something foolish like "formless".  Rather, the earth became an uninhabitable wasteland.  And we don't know the time frame between v.1 and v.2.

We don't need no stinkin' evolution to explain earth age.  :) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  118
  • Topics Per Day:  0.05
  • Content Count:  2,989
  • Content Per Day:  1.25
  • Reputation:   825
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  11/29/2017
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  04/01/1968

10 hours ago, Renskedejonge said:

Because He is Light. I would expect everything to always be light.

He formed the light and created the darkness.

God is spiritual light.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  118
  • Topics Per Day:  0.05
  • Content Count:  2,989
  • Content Per Day:  1.25
  • Reputation:   825
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  11/29/2017
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  04/01/1968

11 hours ago, FreeGrace said:

Evolution explains a very slow process of the development of animals that leads finally to man.  That is unbiblical.  From Genesis 1 we know that God created immediately, by speaking things into existence.

While evolution DEMANDS an old earth for its theory, an old earth doesn't need evolution at all.

That's focusing back to the thread topic, 👍 

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  118
  • Topics Per Day:  0.05
  • Content Count:  2,989
  • Content Per Day:  1.25
  • Reputation:   825
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  11/29/2017
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  04/01/1968

3 hours ago, FreeGrace said:

If mornings and evenings require the sun, and there isn't a sun, then how can the Bible describe "morning and evening"?    :) 

Dusk and Dawn the period in the evening and morning when there's light but the sun isn't visible above the horizon to gauge time, there's 18 minutes each period. 36 mins each day that is totally impossible to know without a mechanical clock.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  4
  • Topic Count:  10
  • Topics Per Day:  0.02
  • Content Count:  4,649
  • Content Per Day:  7.96
  • Reputation:   631
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  11/07/2022
  • Status:  Offline

11 hours ago, BeyondET said:

Dusk and Dawn the period in the evening and morning when there's light but the sun isn't visible above the horizon to gauge time, there's 18 minutes each period. 36 mins each day that is totally impossible to know without a mechanical clock.

The argument that a sun is required for there to be a "24 hour day" just doesn't hold up.  God created time, not Timex.  Or Rolex.  So He didn't need to create a sun before He started timing His restoration of the earth.

The Bible tells us the time for each day of restoration.  So it doesn't matter what day the sun was created.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Diamond Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  82
  • Topics Per Day:  0.03
  • Content Count:  1,501
  • Content Per Day:  0.47
  • Reputation:   900
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  10/11/2015
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  05/25/1970

13 hours ago, BeyondET said:

He formed the light and created the darkness.

God is spiritual light.

Yes but why is there even darkness? 

Revelation 22:5

5 There shall be no night there: They need no lamp nor light of the sun, for the Lord God gives them light. And they shall reign forever and ever.

I'm not saying that it proves that satan fell already, but that was the reason I thought: oh yes that's possible.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  3
  • Topic Count:  27
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  5,197
  • Content Per Day:  0.68
  • Reputation:   994
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  06/20/2003
  • Status:  Offline

On 12/22/2023 at 7:12 PM, BeyondET said:

Evolution explains a very slow process of the development of animals that leads finally to man.  That is unbiblical.

In the sense that plate tectonics, protons, and radio waves are unbiblical.   Lots of observed things like evolution and radio are true, even if they aren't in the Bible.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...