Questions for evolution believers

[BeyondET]

14 hours ago, RV_Wizard said:

Oh, come on, you're not 14.  You've heard the phrase molecules to man before.  It means that a few random molecules got together and formed life, and then that continuously upgraded itself over multiple generations until it became man.

Honestly that's the first time I've heard molecules to man. I'm 55 but I still learn of new things even if they were long ago haha..

Stem cells are the building blocks of everything. They hold a vast amount of God's creation the information.

[BeyondET]

14 hours ago, RV_Wizard said:

Eyelids ADAPTED, but everyone who ever existed was designed to have eyelids.  The same could be said for darker skin and larger noses to process heat in the desert.  None of that changes the fact that the only ancestor of man is man.

The only text given on where man came from is dirt. Nothing says it was instant or each minute a whole process of evolvment happened which lead to man. The final purpose on earth.

[RV_Wizard]

11 hours ago, BeyondET said:

The only text given on where man came from is dirt. Nothing says it was instant or each minute a whole process of evolvment happened which lead to man. The final purpose on earth.

And God saw every thing that he had made, and, behold, it was very good. And the evening and the morning were the sixth day.

[Who me]

On 12/27/2023 at 2:42 PM, BeyondET said:

Adaptability in creatures to evolve into protective shapes and colouration hmm, sounds like evolution?

Evolution is gaining an ability that the parent did not have.

So adapting to a situation based on that creatures genes is not evolution.

[BeyondET]

On 12/31/2023 at 9:41 AM, Who me said:

Evolution is gaining an ability that the parent did not have.

So adapting to a situation based on that creatures genes is not evolution.

So a animal that adapts, gains the ability to have protective shapes and colors that the parent's didn't have isn't evolution huh. That's exactly what you said, adapt to have protective shapes and colors and that certainly means the parent's didn't have protective shapes and colors.

The animal with protective shape and color will then pass the genes on for its young to survive with the same shape and color. Then animal migrates to another area and the process repeats itself, adapting to the new environment creating new genes to survive.

Your body creates new genetic cells often from scratch, when ever a different pathogen enters the body that's not known to the immune system. Your immune system will create new genetic cells evolved to fight the pathogen.

Edited January 2 by BeyondET

[BeyondET]

On 12/31/2023 at 8:57 AM, RV_Wizard said:

And God saw every thing that he had made, and, behold, it was very good. And the evening and the morning were the sixth day.

That would be Genesis 1:31,

 

Gen 2:4

This is the account of the heavens and the earth when they were created, in the day that the LORD God made them.

Edited January 2 by BeyondET

[RV_Wizard]

1 hour ago, BeyondET said:

Gen 2:4

This is the account of the heavens and the earth when they were created, in the day that the LORD God made them.

Genesis 1 describes the sequence and timeline of creation.  Genesis 2 goes into some greater detail.  Contrary to what some claim, it is NOT  separate creation account.  In the original text there are no chapters and verses.  Those were added later to make the text easier to read.

[BeyondET]

1 hour ago, RV_Wizard said:

Genesis 1 describes the sequence and timeline of creation.  Genesis 2 goes into some greater detail.  Contrary to what some claim, it is NOT  separate creation account.  In the original text there are no chapters and verses.  Those were added later to make the text easier to read.

The timeline of the verse I posted is a day.

I think they were inspired to be added and for quite a few reasons not just simplicity.

Edited January 2 by BeyondET

[TrueFollowerOfChrist]

15 hours ago, BeyondET said:

So a animal that adapts, gains the ability to have protective shapes and colors that the parent's didn't have isn't evolution huh. That's exactly what you said, adapt to have protective shapes and colors and that certainly means the parent's didn't have protective shapes and colors.

The animal with protective shape and color will then pass the genes on for its young to survive with the same shape and color. Then animal migrates to another area and the process repeats itself, adapting to the new environment creating new genes to survive.

Your body creates new genetic cells often from scratch, when ever a different pathogen enters the body that's not known to the immune system. Your immune system will create new genetic cells evolved to fight the pathogen.

I believe you are referring to microevolution, changes within species. The Bible certainly does not condemn microevolution as it is observable science. What the Bible actually forbids from the very first chapter is macroevolution, the changing of one species into another species. This has never been observed, nor is there even a single fossil in the fossil record to suggest that it is ever occurred. This is the type of evolution that is repeatedly told to us in science classes and in science programs on TV. This is the type of evolution that requires a billions of years framework. The problem is, no one has ever actually seen macroevolution take place. No one has ever seen a cat give birth to a dog, or an elephant give birth to a lion. Macroevolution is the huge lie that attempts to replace God as creator. Also the concept of a billions of years old Earth is simply ridiculous. It lacks any support in the Bible and even lacks massive support in real science. The Bible and true science itself fits much more perfectly with a very young Earth.

[BeyondET]

2 hours ago, TrueFollowerOfChrist said:

I believe you are referring to microevolution, changes within species. The Bible certainly does not condemn microevolution as it is observable science. What the Bible actually forbids from the very first chapter is macroevolution, the changing of one species into another species. This has never been observed, nor is there even a single fossil in the fossil record to suggest that it is ever occurred. This is the type of evolution that is repeatedly told to us in science classes and in science programs on TV. This is the type of evolution that requires a billions of years framework. The problem is, no one has ever actually seen macroevolution take place. No one has ever seen a cat give birth to a dog, or an elephant give birth to a lion. Macroevolution is the huge lie that attempts to replace God as creator. Also the concept of a billions of years old Earth is simply ridiculous. It lacks any support in the Bible and even lacks massive support in real science. The Bible and true science itself fits much more perfectly with a very young Earth.

Microevolution over thousands of years ends up being macroevolution.

You saying no one has seen a cat give birth to a dog is ignorant even on the knowledge of macroevolution which doesn't happen like that

The idea of a young earth is ridiculous. It lacks any support in the Bible as well. And especially any support in the real science. There's never been any claims to a young earth by scientist.

 

 

Edited January 2 by BeyondET