Jump to content
IGNORED

head coverings


Darling_Deedee

Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Members
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  2
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  12
  • Content Per Day:  0.00
  • Reputation:   0
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  10/08/2008
  • Status:  Offline

I wear scarves - huge rectangles of cloth that I tie bun-style. I also look horrendous in a hats. I also am a fan of the snood but I don't wear them very often.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 71
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic


  • Group:  Advanced Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  10
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  447
  • Content Per Day:  0.07
  • Reputation:   14
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  08/25/2006
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  10/26/1971

Western societies do not understand the concept of veiling, so wearing a veil today may be as uncommon and offensive as an unveiled woman in the first century.

Unveiled women were an offensive sight in the first century, as it is today in strict Muslim societies. Paul was simply trying to establish some order in the church. Veiling was an issue only because of their culture, in my opinion.

I am contentious about this because I think Christians should distance themselves from Muslims and others who degrade women and make women wear tents over their bodies. Veiling means nothing to me or my society.

Paul was clear that veiling was not obligatory. I would go further and say that in Western societies it could even be detrimental.

Can you win the lost dressed in a tent or heavily veiled? No way.

So, what was Paul saying,
Edited by KC02
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  69
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  4,079
  • Content Per Day:  0.53
  • Reputation:   429
  • Days Won:  5
  • Joined:  03/22/2003
  • Status:  Offline

Western societies do not understand the concept of veiling, so wearing a veil today may be as uncommon and offensive as an unveiled woman in the first century.

50 years ago it was a common practice for western women to cover their hair in church with hats, scarfs, dollies, just as men removed their hats when they pray. The liberal lifestyle change in the church and fashion has simply cast the practice aside over time . . . because they do not understand.

The addition of a complete veil is a whole other mater.

Unveiled women were an offensive sight in the first century, as it is today in strict Muslim societies. Paul was simply trying to establish some order in the church. Veiling was an issue only because of their culture, in my opinion.

I am not so sure

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am contentious about this because I think Christians should distance themselves from Muslims and others who degrade women and make women wear tents over their bodies. Veiling means nothing to me or my society.

I don't think they're talking about burkas.

1 Corinthians 11

15 But if a woman has long hair, it is a glory to her; for her hair is given to her for a covering.

Most women I know, don't look like cousin "IT".

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  5
  • Topic Count:  827
  • Topics Per Day:  0.10
  • Content Count:  12,101
  • Content Per Day:  1.50
  • Reputation:   249
  • Days Won:  3
  • Joined:  04/01/2002
  • Status:  Offline

It's not about burkas or veils. Most women wear a scarf on the top of their heads - some the long scarfs that drape on the sides. Where I go to church, the ones that wear them put them on at the beginning of a prayer. No one is supposed to be looking then, anyway. :emot-hug:

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Advanced Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  10
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  447
  • Content Per Day:  0.07
  • Reputation:   14
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  08/25/2006
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  10/26/1971

I am not so sure
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  69
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  4,079
  • Content Per Day:  0.53
  • Reputation:   429
  • Days Won:  5
  • Joined:  03/22/2003
  • Status:  Offline

. . .you are twisting the Scripture around to support your viewpoint.

Really?

Thanks for showing me where and how . . .

As far as referencing you're being contentious . . . you were the one who admitted it . . . and continue the display of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  69
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  4,079
  • Content Per Day:  0.53
  • Reputation:   429
  • Days Won:  5
  • Joined:  03/22/2003
  • Status:  Offline

. . . Scarfs and long hair are fine, but it should be a personal choice if not dictated by society.

How far do you take this "person choice" when applying God's word?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Advanced Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  10
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  447
  • Content Per Day:  0.07
  • Reputation:   14
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  08/25/2006
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  10/26/1971

. . .you are twisting the Scripture around to support your viewpoint.

Really?

Thanks for showing me where and how . . .

As far as referencing you're being contentious . . . you were the one who admitted it . . . and continue the display of it.

16 If anyone wants to be contentious about this, we have no other practice

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  5
  • Topic Count:  827
  • Topics Per Day:  0.10
  • Content Count:  12,101
  • Content Per Day:  1.50
  • Reputation:   249
  • Days Won:  3
  • Joined:  04/01/2002
  • Status:  Offline

Impressive post, Rufus.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...