Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 02/09/2012 in all areas

  1. Just when did America become a Democracy? We are a CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC. WE have NEVER BEEN a democracy.
    2 points
  2. Well, your right on target with this. There is a numerous amount of contextual passages that speak to this. But at the very least, the most overlooked proof is that which is one of the most obvious. "If the righteous is scarcely saved, what will become of the ungodly and the sinner?" Believers are called "righteous".
    2 points
  3. Let me repharse what I'm trying to say in a way that might have us speaking the same language. Suppose we had a business but we decided there was no central core tenants or focus of that business and that everyone was just going to go off into seperate corners with folks that they liked and work. How far do you think we'd get? Let's look at another example and the One upon which America was founded and this is the Judeo/Christian ethic. Christ is the head of the corporate Body and through Him the goals and the focus flow. We all are all seperate disparate peoples and cultures but we all speak the same language. The Language of Heaven and we all have One standard set of rules that guide our behavior and our ethic.
    1 point
  4. Some never do focus on it. There are some indeed who never look back and just keep going straight. But that does not mean that there are not those who do. Or, that it cannot happen. Those are the people Paul is addressing, the people who were struggling with the two natures. I in no way mean to say that the born again believer is not able to sin, nor do I pretend that they are free from the temptation to sin. However, I will say to my dying day that the born again believer has been set free from the servitude of sin. Before a person is born again they have no choice but to sin, they are enslaved by it. I know of quite a few people who focus on sin. But I think that we may be thinking about different definitions of this. The analogy is like this; Archery is a wonderful exercise of self-control, focus, and skillful training of ones body. When an archer draws and releases an arrow, there is much more to it than pulling back a string and then letting it go. The master of archery is one who practices it every day. And not just every day, but throughout the day. It is something that you make apart of yourself. When an archer gets ready to shoot, the bow and arrow become an extension of who he is. However, just like with anything else, you will never find an archer who even after spending day after day - year after year - will hit the mark exactly in the same spot he was aiming each time he shoots. In fact, archery is always based on the moment by moment time that you are shooting. And because no two moments in time and space are exactly alike, there is no way to ever prepare for anything that might happen. So, the archer draws, anchors, picks a spot(mark), and releases. What happens? More often than not he misses the mark. But what comes next is what sets the amateurs apart from the true archers. The amateur looks at the spot he did hit and judges from it where he should aim next. But in doing so, he sets himself up for a unending cycle of never hitting the mark. Because he is not expecting to hit the mark he sets for the next shot, he is expecting to hit the mark he was looking at the first time. However, because no two moments in time are the same, he has ruled out any wind variation, humidity changes, changes in arrow weight, changes in draw length, changes in the anchor point, etc. The list goes on and on. Contrast that with the master archer. He misses the mark on his first shot. What does he do? He forgets about that shot. He concentrates harder on the mark. He may very well miss again, but each time he shoots he concentrates harder and harder. He is able to do that because he never looses sight of the original mark. The amateur cannot concentrate hard on the mark because the mark he looks too is always changing based upon where he hit last. Oh sure, he can see the original mark, but it does not mean as much to him as it does the master archer. This is the Christian walk illustrated. There are many 'immature' Christians around because they do not keep Christ as their one and only mark in focus. They walk along, they sin, they look at the sin and say "I don't want to do that". So they look at that sin, examine it, see what they did 'wrong', and then try to avoid it in the future. The fallacy in this is they use their judgement in trying to figure out what they did wrong. There are so many things that it could be. And even worse, a lot of the time they will look to others to see what direction they should go in to keep it from happening again. But the mature Christian looks at the sin he commits and says, Jesus. Then turns from it(repentance) and never looks back. That is what repentance is, it is a turning away from. And if you turn away from something, tell me, how can you still see it? Keep one focus, and one focus only. Jesus the Christ...His righteousness imputed onto you. The more this is your focus, the more times you will hit closer to the mark. But when one associates themselves with being a sinner, then they are associating themselves with the natural man and not the spiritual. These two are contrary to one another and cannot be focused on together. Its one or the other. And like it or not, you have to choose between the two.
    1 point
  5. Hi Denise, thanks for the post and i am sure you will get some good scriptural advice here. Just one small thing. Worthy tries not to use words that are shortened such as text message words, or using 2 for two, or 4 for four. It makes for difficult reading for some of us older members Please do me a favor and use the full word plz, sorry, I mean please
    1 point
  6. I will re-open the thread as promised, but please keep the discussion respectful.
    1 point
  7. excellent verse. The neat thing about that verse is that it transcends the "old" and "new" testaments. In other words, its used in both. Therefore its a 'set standard' in God's eyes.
    1 point
  8. 1 point
  9. The law of Moses still stands to condemn the unbelievers. Paul in his treatise on the Law of Moses stated that the Law defined sin and I died. Jesus said your accuser is Moses. The Law of Moses. It was a school teacher to lead us to the Law of Grace (Christ). We who went there are free of the law of sin and death (Romans 8:2). It still points to Christ, but it stands to condemn those who do not believe in Christ.
    1 point
  10. If you want the thread to stay open, why don'tcha call me 'stupid' a few more times?
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...