coheir

I was able to find this on youtube it is not the US government though it is Faith and Freedom discussing the title below worth 11 minutes Pentagon Recants Labeling Christians "Domestic Terrorists" I think the government has removed the word Christian now; they list beliefs like if you oppose abortion you need to be watched and other beliefs that may be related to Christianity but not the actual word anymore. I believe Faith and Freedom are on our side too. and the other side also youtube The Fingerprints of US right-wing Christian Terrorism

Iill look around some more I dont believe Christians are more of or bigger threat but I believe they are on the radar of the Dems

then i failed you sorry so something like this is not sound http://joemiller.us/2013/04/101st-battalion-commanders-outrageous-e-mail-to-subordinates-characterizing-traditionalists-as-haters/

unless you are at work.... or on vacation... I somehow sincerely doubt a muslim terrorist is going to blow up an empty house. In fact I doubt theyre going to blow up a house at all. like I said less then 1% of the US population is muslim-even less of that, are extremists, and theyre far more likely to go after things that you know, might actually create terror, like parades, parks, hospitals. . .not someones home thats just a waste. IF we had a larger muslim population, and I mean a FAR larger population, I maybe worried, but as it is, 1% isnt going to waste time on homes. As far as foreign muslims coming in-again, unlikely to hit a home. why? because in order to actually create terror doing that youd have to hit a LOT of homes. That is a lot of manpower and resources that a foreign group would have to smuggle in here, to do it, and even with our open borders, it would be difficult to do. It would be far better and more efficient-to hit places like malls, hospitals, parades, etc. You use less resources-and create more panic. I mean serious, you blow up a house? neighbors on all sides go out and buy high tech cameras and AR-15s. Blow up a parade float? everyone stays home. i agree they normally would not attack a house. They would rather take out the electric grid so that thousands of people will do without; now days one can not buy anything without the use of electricity. at the point where a county or several county's are with out electric then comes the criminals to take from the ones that have something stored up or are just waiting for electric to come back on.

is there a government website that confirms that they view christians as the top threat? you might look here http://thetruthwins.com/archives/72-types-of-americans-that-are-considered-potential-terrorists-in-official-government-documents http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-defense-department-teaching-documents-suggest-mainstream-conservative-views-extremist/

even though we have freedom of speech here if one tries to point this out one could end up on a list they should not be on.

most of them probably did not last a month i would guess they most likely were eaten by other bigger fish they just were not attached to a fishing pole. Also it is illegal to use gold fish as bait every where I fished in the U.S. However it is legal to buy bait ( some bait is taken from the place one usually fishes ) and use food coloring to add color to them like orange or red coloring. just keep in the bucket and add the food coloring for a day or two.

http://mariomurilloministries.wordpress.com/2013/04/15/federal-government-lists-evangelical-christianity-as-a-top-terrorist-threat/ guess who is above ISIS on the U.S. terrorist list

Possibly by recording/storing all voice call data, Cameras/microphones every where, recording all internet sites one may visit even comments made online. This a couple things one would use , I think. If it were up to me, I would begin profiling everyone connected to any Islamic organization. This would quickly separate the innocent from the questionable. I would too

Possibly by recording/storing all voice call data, Cameras/microphones every where, recording all internet sites one may visit even comments made online. This a couple things one would use , I think.

We have politicians that need to be told that over here too, true....of course we won't mention names that close call in Australia should further attention to what time of day it is..... I think we have had several cases like that in the past decade. Most politicians just don't see the forest for the trees.

that would be the entire power structure of our Nation..... and most of the people in our government. I do not want to live under the united nations laws. I want to keep the American Constitution in tact. If that means getting rid of people that are intent on the destruction of our Constitution then I would like to see them out of government.

All Muslims or those who are not citizens? we do not need people living next door that state openly " you must convert to my beliefs" or off with you're head. They politely move in but when they can not change the laws they resort to my first comment. There is roughly 3,480,000 muslims in America. Now when one campares 3,480,000 to the American population 313.9 million it does not sound like many muslims. if half of them decided to become a martyr it would sound different So your answer is to deport American citizens because you don't agree with their religion? Exactly where do you think that would stop? Once you deny rights to one group it only becomes easier to deny them to the next. Whether you agree with them or like what they believe is irrelevant...in this country they have the right to practice whatever religion they wish, the same right you have. it is not about citizenship its about strapping on bombs and going to the mall. I also think we have a right to own guns at least for protection and if some one robs or kills with a gun they should be put away from general public whether that is life in prison or death they need to be removed. anyone who is talking one world government also should be stopped. I think it should stop when evil is out of government and evil no longer threatens law abiding citizens.

if certain groups get their way one will not be able to own animals in 2059

The New KJV G 22:1 Now it came to pass after these things that God tested Abraham, when I read verse 1 I think reveal the strengths or capabilities of (someone or something) by putting them under strain. J 1:13 Let no one say when he is tempted, "I am tempted by God. when I read verse 13 I think entice or attempt to entice (someone) to do or acquire something that they find attractive but know to be wrong or not beneficial. God will test us he doesn't tempt us.

All Muslims or those who are not citizens? we do not need people living next door that state openly " you must convert to my beliefs" or off with you're head. They politely move in but when they can not change the laws they resort to my first comment. There is roughly 3,480,000 muslims in America. Now when one campares 3,480,000 to the American population 313.9 million it does not sound like many muslims. if half of them decided to become a martyr it would sound different

might be Isa 57: 1 The righteous perisheth, and no man layeth it to heart: and merciful men are taken away, none considering that the righteous is taken away from the evil to come.

I see no need for them to register I do see a need to force all muslims out of U.S. and at least half of the South Americans.

i heard or read a news report the other day that something like 56,000 illegal children have come across the border and that about 30k of them or something like that have disappeared and are unaccounted for, presumably scattered throughout the country. oh the irony. the liberal media has helped promote the lie that childhood immunizations are not linked to autism, but are quickly blaming the vaccinations for these new diseases? are you serious? LOL, i guess their tune changes when it suits their agenda, doesn't it. Its been proven that autism is not linked to vaccination. The so called doctor who first claimed it has been proven false and he has lost his medical license. do you know the name of the doc you are speaking of? this has been and interesting topic for me and this is the first i have read of this. previously i have read that some vaccines contain a mercury based compound and several doctors are saying its poison. i have also listened to a phone call that was recorded that was made to a place that manufactures vaccines and they were very dismissive and when asked if the person on the phone takes the vaccines they would not say yes or no but tripped over thier tounge. so i am curious about what you have to say and would like to research it. any info you can provide would be appreciated. thanks. http://healthimpactnews.com/2014/dr-brian-hooker-father-of-vaccine-damaged-child-and-his-relentless-pursuit-to-expose-fraud-at-cdc/ I think this what you are looking for Cletus

What we see now is that the liberals don't care one bit what their state's constitution says. And why should they? They have been emboldened by a liberal, far left president who doesn't care what the US Constitution says and thumbs his nose at it every chance he gets. Liberalism has run unrestrained in this country and we have allowed it. I agree, we need to take a stand now, may not get another chance if we dont act now.

We have politicians that need to be told that over here too,

Thanks for the info I did not know most of what you posted.

There are other groups which promote Sabbath-keeping as a requirement. I see no issue with gathering to worship on a Saturday, but do not see any requirement to worship only on a Saturday. Gathering for services can occur all 7 days of the week, and worship should happen all 7 days of the week. In the OT, services occurred in the Temple all 7 days of the week. In modern Judaism, synagogues are open for worship, all 7 days of the week. There are predominantly Gentile groups which call themselves Messianic, which promote Sabbath worship. A couple of these groups deny the deity of Jesus, or do not make it a required belief. One such Messianic group is called Worldwide Nazarene Assembly of Elohim. Most Gentile Messianic groups believe in Two House theology, as does this one. The following are two statements from their statement of faith: http://nazarenespace.com/page/statement-of-faith I. YHWH We believe that YHWH is Echad (one). We believe that YHWH reveals Himself in the K'numeh or Gaunin of Avi/Abba (Father/Daddy), the Memra (Word), and the Ruach HaKodesh (Holy Spirit). III. MESSIAH We believe that Y'shua HaMashiach has come and with great joy we anticipate his return, and even though he may delay, nevertheless we endeavor to think about his return every day. We believe that the Messiah is the Word made flesh. We believe he was born of a virgin, lived a sinless life in accordance with the Torah, performed miracles, was crucified for the atonement of his people in accordance with the Scriptures, was bodily resurrected on the third day. ascended to heaven and currently sits at the right hand of YHWH. He will return at the end of this age to usher in the Kingdom of Elohim on earth and will rule the world from Jerusalem with his people Israel for one thousand years. We also believe that the Messiah Yeshua is the Torah incarnate. Just as the Torah is the way, the truth and the light, the Messiah is also the way, the truth and the light. Notice, they side step the issue of the Deity of Jesus (Y'shua). VI. THE ONE FAITH We believe that there is one faith which was once and for all delivered to the set-apart-ones. We believe that Messiah did not come to create a new religion but to be the Messiah of Judaism, the one faith that was once delivered to the set-apart-ones. We believe that Nazarene Judaism is the only expression of the one true faith. We do not accept any other religion as a non-Jewish cultural expression of the one true faith. This group was started and run by James Trimm, who claims to be Jewish, but he is not Jewish. His parents say they are not Jewish and neither is James. James attended a Messianic Judaism synagogue for a short time, and said he is a gentile while attending. (Messianic Judaism, formed by Jewish believers in Jesus meet on the Sabbath, although do not see this as a required action among Christians. Messianic Judaism believes in the deity of Jesus). (Father/Daddy ) I prefer Father, Son. Holy Spirit not Daddy (We believe that the Messiah is the Word made flesh. We believe he was born of a virgin, lived a sinless life in accordance with the Torah, performed miracles, was crucified for the atonement of his people in accordance with the Scriptures, was bodily resurrected on the third day) This sounds like no Gentiles are included. (We also believe that the Messiah Yeshua is the Torah incarnate. Just as the Torah is the way, the truth and the light) Not sure I would call the Torah "the way,the truth, and the light" (We believe that Nazarene Judaism is the only expression of the one true faith. We do not accept any other religion as a non-Jewish cultural expression of the one true faith.) does this mean gentiles have no hope unless they convert to Nazarene?

Not is not a poor argument. They may not have had the finalized canon of 27 books established, but even Paul and Peter were beginning to recognize a NT canon. The letters of Paul were being passed around from church to church, as were the Gospels. They were being taught by the apostles. Nowhere were any Gentiles in any of the letters or the Gospels commanded to observe the Sabbath. If it was required of them, there would have been plenty of admonitions to all of the churches in the NT. But none exist. Even if we go only by the OT, no Gentiles were expected to keep the Torah unless they converted to the Israelite religion. Then they had to be circumcised and all that. They had to become part of Israel. But no one outside of Israel, even in the OT were ever commanded to keep the Sabbath. The Sabbath was only given to Israel in the OT and you cannot find ONE commandment even in the OT that contradicts that fact. Instead of using NT verses, show me in the Tanakh that says sabbath day is not for gentiles That's the point I am making. You don't have any verses in the Tanakh or the NT commanding Gentiles to keep the Sabbath. The Sabbath, as a commandment is only given to Israel, in Exodus 20:8-11; 31:13-17; Lev. 23:3; Deut. 5:12-15. There are no commandments given to the Gentile nations requiring them to keep the Sabbath. So the truth is that it is YOU that have the burden of proof when you claim that the Bible requires Gentiles to keep the Sabbath. You don't have any at all. I think you know that, too. I don't have to come up with a verse that says, "the Sabbath is not for Gentiles" because that hasn't been my argument. My argument has been that Gentiles are free to keep the Sabbath day and they are free not to keep the Sabbath day. It is not compulsory on Gentiles. So far, you have not been able to drum up ONE verses of Scripture to support your position that Gentiles are required to keep the Sabbath day. Your argument is impotent and devoid of truth Isaiah 56:6 “Also the sons of the foreigner Who join themselves to the Lord, to serve Him, And to love the name of the Lord, to be His servants— Everyone who keeps from defiling the Sabbath, And holds fast My covenant— 7 Even them I will bring to My holy mountain, And make them joyful in My house of prayer. Their burnt offerings and their sacrifices Will be accepted on My altar; For My house shall be called a house of prayer for all nations.” 8 The Lord God, who gathers the outcasts of Israel, says, “Yet I will gather to him Others besides those who are gathered to him.” This passages proves that a gentile who is a foreigner can keep the sabbath who join themelves to the Lord. I've asked a rabbi who I am friends with. I asked him that can gentile keep the sabbath. He said if he wanted to according to the book of Isaiah. check out Matt 23: 1-8

those are the three meats I grew up on until I went out on my on and done some reading about them.