Jump to content

Mutzrein

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    305
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

0 Neutral

2 Followers

About Mutzrein

  • Birthday 11/12/1950

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Auckland - NZ

Recent Profile Visitors

1,445 profile views
  1. explain with a little more depth. not sure exactly what you are saying. What aspect would you like explanation of?
  2. Don't you understand that what you receive from God when you are born again, is life. No one - physically or spiritually can choose to receive life because they are DEAD. When a person's name is written in the book of life they are destined to receive life. Receiving life (eternal) is being born into God's kingdom. Once they have received the gift of life, THEN they have a choice as to what they do with the gift. Some to eternal reward and some to eternal punishment. The parables relate to these people (those in the kingdom) - not all of mankind.
  3. OK - my opinion too. Scripture tells us that being born of God is not a 'human decision'. So if it is not our decision, we are left with one alternative. It is God's decision.
  4. First off, work out is not work on. "Work out" means to live our lives according to the gospel of Christ AFTER we are born again, but that is another topic. Not this one. I agree but I wanted to clarify getat151's premise - which I have now. Thanks.
  5. I haven't given an opinion yet - just wanted to know how you define 'saved' as I mentioned in my previous post. This, to me is an element which many people do not grasp. There is a difference (as it relates to a will to choose) between those who are born of God and those who are not. Blessings
  6. Another provocative question and to me there is a point that needs clarification. What does it mean to you to be saved? Do you mean the point at which we are born again OR the process through which we 'work out our salvation'?
  7. Praise God! - Yes! Yes! Yes! and yes we are one with Christ in the same way that Jesus and the Father are one - By the Spirit. Keep searching scripture and keep asking questions. There are some here who know the answers to your questions.
  8. Have you given any thought to my first post - #19?
  9. Confronting false teaching is not the same as a "attacking" a person. When someone is wrong, they are wrong and it is not "attacking" them to say so. In this case, the denial of Jesus' Deity is a heresy in the truest, theological sense of the word because it is a denial of not only the basic teaching of Scripture, but is also a challenge to God's integrity. One cannot love God and reject what His Word says. One cannot be a Christian and reject the Deity of Jesus. It is simply an impossibility. Scripture tells us that each of us, to our own master, stands or falls. My master is God - a relationship that I have been afforded by his grace, through faith in Christ. Unlike you, it seems, I cannot boast of anything except the cross of my Lord Jesus Christ. You see, I know that I am a new creation. I know that I have passed from death to life. And I know I am God's son, not because I accept the deity of Jesus, but because I have been afforded His wondrous gift of love and life. Without the Deity of Jesus, none of that is possible, because the Bible does not allow you to accept the gift of salvation on your terms. You cannot say "I have faith in Christ, but I reject His Deity." It doesn't work that way. Salvation from beginning to end is a work of God. It is not the work of God through a mere man. If all God needed was good man, He could have sacrificed Moses. Jesus death, if He was not God, would be sufficient to save anyone, much less make them a new creation. Here is the fallacy of your logic. You claim to be a "new creation." But the Bible says we are only New Creations "in Christ." That is not possible if Christ is just a man. Jesus simply as a man cannot recreate anyone's heart. That is work of God and you cannot be "in Christ" if Christ is just a man. You are trying force the Bible to fit around your rejection of Jesus' Deity, and it simply doesn't fit. If your faith was truly in Christ, you would accept His words that He is God. You would believe the Bible. As it stands, you reject one of the most important doctines in Scripture. The Deity of Jesus is a major part the foundation of the Christian faith and without it, your faith is in a man, and that is nothing but idolatry. Rejection of Christ's Deity diminishes the work of the cross. You have jumped to a conclusion that is fallacious. I have never said that Jesus was just a man. My faith is in Christ because I am in Christ. I have not 'accepted' Christ as one who would 'accept' or give assent to a doctrine. I have been grafted into the vine which is Christ. This is because I am born of God. And I am born of God NOT through any human decision but by God's will. And any who would deny it, deny the righteousness that I have in Christ. Man of course will try, but God and scripture will not.
  10. Confronting false teaching is not the same as a "attacking" a person. When someone is wrong, they are wrong and it is not "attacking" them to say so. In this case, the denial of Jesus' Deity is a heresy in the truest, theological sense of the word because it is a denial of not only the basic teaching of Scripture, but is also a challenge to God's integrity. One cannot love God and reject what His Word says. One cannot be a Christian and reject the Deity of Jesus. It is simply an impossibility. Scripture tells us that each of us, to our own master, stands or falls. My master is God - a relationship that I have been afforded by his grace, through faith in Christ. Unlike you, it seems, I cannot boast of anything except the cross of my Lord Jesus Christ. You see, I know that I am a new creation. I know that I have passed from death to life. And I know I am God's son, not because I accept the deity of Jesus, but because I have been afforded His wondrous gift of love and life.
  11. Has anyone mentioned this? 1 Corinthians 15:24-28 (NIV) Then the end will come, when he hands over the kingdom to God the Father after he has destroyed all dominion, authority and power. For he must reign until he has put all his enemies under his feet. The last enemy to be destroyed is death. For he "has put everything under his feet." Now when it says that "everything" has been put under him, it is clear that this does not include God himself, who put everything under Christ. When he has done this, then the Son himself will be made subject to him who put everything under him, so that God may be all in all.
  12. I've had many experiences over the years with those who promote the experience and this is the question I ask. Does it glorify God? And let's not forget that just because the word 'God' or 'Jesus' or 'spirit' is used and so-called supernatural things happen, that this is no evidence of God being glorified. In fact rather, I have seen evidence of the opposite.
  13. Oh I see. So not only am I not a Christian according to some (because I cannot accept the common interpretation of the Trinity) but I am ignorant. Ah well I'm happy in knowing that the the foolishness of God is wiser than man's wisdom. What part of the Trinity do you disagree with, or what part of the definition? To me if you believe in Christ as spoken of in scripture, the one who all things were created through, then you do indeed believe in the Trinity, it may just be semantics? I don't try to get into the complexities but for me it is very simple only God can forgive sins and I want and need my sins forgiven thus I must know who God is. Woops missed this one. It is as scripture says: Jesus is the Son OF God. Not, the Son who is God. Jesus is the Lamb OF God. Not, the Lamb who is God. Forgiveness of sin? Of course it is God who forgives sin. But Jesus is the ONE to whom God has given all authority because He has put all things under his feet, except of course God himself who put all things under him. This is not semantics. This is the Truth
  14. How are those who know God through His creation are suppose to know about Salvation through Jesus when they were not living in the known world at that time? Did Jesus go to South America? Did the Gospel reach those living in the deepest parts of the world? Is it written on the sky? The rocks? The Trees? How?? They only know that God created everything and in their hearts, they understood this, which changed their hearts. I am speaking of those who are of this group. They may be far and few between, but it is my belief that there were some. This group, God will judge their hearts. We rightly stand firmly on the Word of God, but because of this, we have put blinders on so we will not be deceived. Yet, I personally believe that God is more then what we find between Genesis 1:1 and Revelation 22:21. Even John tells us in John 21:25 ... And there are also many other things that Jesus did, which if they were written one by one, I suppose that even the world itself could not contain the books that would be written. Amen. If just the things that Jesus did in his ministry on this earth is that large, one has to understand that all that God does is far greater. So great that our finite minds would never be able to hold it all. Your Brother In Christ, OneLight Yes I believe I understand what you are saying. I understand that you are talking about the eternal destination of those who never had the opportunity to hear the gospel. And so am I. But I am talking about them from the perspective of those (ie yourself) who believe that they (those who haven
  15. I think you missed the point OneLight. The text that you emboldened is not speaking of those who are the subject of this discussion. It is speaking of you - of Christendom. It is Christendom that stands on the wrong premise. It is Christendom that has misinterpreted scripture and now tries to find (even as other religions have done down through time) another way to God.
×
×
  • Create New...