SanDiegoCA

I wonder if she has gone thru the classes for couch jumping, incomplete nonsense sentences and the eye staring for hours.

The irony is today the news reported President Bush and his top aides publicly made 935 false statements about the security risk posed by Iraq in the two years following September 11, 2001, according to a study released Tuesday by two nonprofit journalism groups. So minus these from the good that leaves zero.

Total Urban legend....

H.R.1940 - Birthright Citizenship Act of 2007 To amend section 301 of the Immigration and Nationality Act to clarify those classes of individuals born in the United States who are nationals and citizens of the United States at birth purposes if the person is born in the United State more...s of parents, one of whom is: (1) a U.S. citizen or national; (2) a lawful permanent resident alien whose residence is in the United States; or (3) an alien performing active service in the armed forces Official: To amend section 301 of the Immigration and Nationality Act to clarify those classes of individuals born in the United States who are nationals and citizens of the United States at birth. as introduced. Short: Birthright Citizenship Act of 2007 as introduced. 4/19/2007--Introduced. May 04, 2007: Referred to the Subcommittee on Immigration, Citizenship, Refugees, Border Security, and International Law. Apr 19, 2007: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary. Introduced on Apr 19, 2007 It has been dead since last sprng.

The statutes that make up the UK constitution can be amended by a simple act of Parliament. There are essentially two ways spelled out in the Constitution for how to propose an amendment. One has never been used. The first method is for a bill to pass both houses of the legislature, by a two-thirds majority in each. Once the bill has passed both houses, it goes on to the states. This is the route taken by all current amendments. Because of some long outstanding amendments, such as the 27th, Congress will normally put a time limit (typically seven years) for the bill to be approved as an amendment (for example, see the 21st and 22nd). The second method prescribed is for a Constitutional Convention to be called by two-thirds of the legislatures of the States, and for that Convention to propose one or more amendments. These amendments are then sent to the states to be approved by three-fourths of the legislatures or conventions. This route has never been taken, and there is discussion in political science circles about just how such a convention would be convened, and what kind of changes it would bring about. Regardless of which of the two proposal routes is taken, the amendment must be ratified, or approved, by three-fourths of states. There are two ways to do this, too. The text of the amendment may specify whether the bill must be passed by the state legislatures or by a state convention. See the Ratification Convention Page for a discussion of the make up of a convention. Amendments are sent to the legislatures of the states by default. Only one amendment, the 21st, specified a convention. In any case, passage by the legislature or convention is by simple majority. Proposal by Congress, ratification by state conventions (used once) Proposal by Congress, ratification by state legislatures (used all other times It is interesting to note that at no point does the President have a role in the formal amendment process (though he would be free to make his opinion known). He cannot veto an amendment proposal, nor a ratification.

Amendment 14 - Citizenship Rights. Ratified 7/9/1868. 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. It will require a constitution amemdment to change the law..I do not see that happening very soon. So it is more political rhetoric than a presidental executive order. He just tickling the ear of the voters.

I have a turtle gnomes in my little garden, amazing how it keeps the cats out from doing their thing..

Or put it this way, I never wanted to get in a Car accident requiring hospitalization in Arkansas..

In california it will be denying treatment for skin cancer, because you didn't wear sun block when you were young.

The "money people" have different rules than you & I. Remember Mickey Mantle getting the liver transplant by jumping to the head of the list..

The first question is do any of these people want to quit smokng, drinking or being obese ? There is lot of help to aid them from their addictions. But when they refuse to be compliant at what point do you say fine, you are on your own. Other than that we are just enabling them in their self denial of addiction.

I saw this as two questions and a serious situation. First: sex outside of marriage. The bible is pretty explicit about a person who practices it and the consequences. But a person can be forgiven by stop (repentance) sinning (practicing) and seek forgiveness. However now reaping what we sow comes into play. From the break of truth and hurt inflicted on their marriage partner to children from the affair. Second: the children from this affair can be a blessing or a curse. Is the man now going to accept responsibly and provide for the child out wedlock. This open a big can of worms that all parties need to be involved or the child of this situation will suffer. Reality is most men walk away and the single mom is left to defend for herself and the child. This happens frequently with divorced men. Christians need to remember fatherless household and include them in our prayers and activites.

I just wish the Harry Potter movies were in english, so I won't have to read the subtitles..

I think the writer was saying two things, one was about Oprah and her plans for a one year study in the Course of Miracles. However, I think the second thing was more important, that the Course of Miracles is not Christian teachings, but is false. This is more important, because people are being deceived. A true work of Satan. Christian know not to put faith in men (woman) but to examine the scriptures to make sure it is truth. The writer points out C of M states we are God, Christ, and much more that is clearly wrong.

Enjoyed the spiritual thought before I begin my day with the world. It will remind me of the power of my tongue to praise the Lord and not the devil.