EnochBethany Posted February 28, 2014 Group: Removed from Forums for Breaking Terms of Service Followers: 1 Topic Count: 8 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 649 Content Per Day: 0.17 Reputation: 99 Days Won: 3 Joined: 02/21/2014 Status: Offline Share Posted February 28, 2014 How do they determine it? You reckon they put up a bullseye with various percents in various places & then throw darts? It's actually much worse than that.... They only have 1/10000000000 of the Board and the darts are Grapefruits. So they just return to the "a priori" adherence to a fairytale train they just got off.... prior to their 13 Century Alchemy tests they perform that they call "science" so as to provide a "Pseudo-Validity Tow the Company Line" smokescreen that they know most assuredly will not be scrutinized by Joe Coffee and Betty Bread-Maker. Rinse Repeat Rinse Repeat IMHO: Ah yes, the Company Line I owe my soul the the Company Line; I loaded 16 tons of # 9 monkey, & the strawboss said, "It's good that your our flunky." Academic freedom & freedom of speech are lacking, at least before tenure. This is such a great post because "flunky' rhymes with "monkey". Silly scientist should be poets, and then everything would make sense and be so much easier... thanks 4 kind words Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
other one Posted February 28, 2014 Group: Worthy Ministers Followers: 29 Topic Count: 598 Topics Per Day: 0.08 Content Count: 56,128 Content Per Day: 7.56 Reputation: 27,857 Days Won: 271 Joined: 12/29/2003 Status: Online Share Posted February 28, 2014 well, I'm wondering if anyone has answered the question that started all this..... maybe I missed something. Just how do they know that they are 98% the same??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enoch2021 Posted February 28, 2014 Group: Royal Member Followers: 11 Topic Count: 19 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 3,396 Content Per Day: 0.90 Reputation: 730 Days Won: 4 Joined: 12/21/2013 Status: Offline Birthday: 12/26/1963 Share Posted February 28, 2014 well, I'm wondering if anyone has answered the question that started all this..... maybe I missed something. Just how do they know that they are 98% the same??? Hey Other, I answered this silliness here: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jerryR34 Posted February 28, 2014 Group: Removed from Forums for Breaking Terms of Service Followers: 0 Topic Count: 18 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 588 Content Per Day: 0.15 Reputation: 82 Days Won: 2 Joined: 11/22/2013 Status: Offline Birthday: 11/12/1969 Author Share Posted February 28, 2014 well, I'm wondering if anyone has answered the question that started all this..... maybe I missed something. Just how do they know that they are 98% the same??? The number comes from DNA-DNA Hybridization. Human to Human DNA uncoils and separates at a given temperature. DNA from two species can be combined, then when heat is applied they will also separate, but not at the same temperature. Chimp and Human DNA separates at 98% of the temp that human to human DNA separates. As I mentioned a few posts ago, this mothod is now giving way to sequencing, but my point was more about meta data than data. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
other one Posted February 28, 2014 Group: Worthy Ministers Followers: 29 Topic Count: 598 Topics Per Day: 0.08 Content Count: 56,128 Content Per Day: 7.56 Reputation: 27,857 Days Won: 271 Joined: 12/29/2003 Status: Online Share Posted February 28, 2014 well, I'm wondering if anyone has answered the question that started all this..... maybe I missed something. Just how do they know that they are 98% the same??? Hey Other, I answered this silliness here: Well, I see why I missed it..... I've been kind of busy lately. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
other one Posted February 28, 2014 Group: Worthy Ministers Followers: 29 Topic Count: 598 Topics Per Day: 0.08 Content Count: 56,128 Content Per Day: 7.56 Reputation: 27,857 Days Won: 271 Joined: 12/29/2003 Status: Online Share Posted February 28, 2014 well, I'm wondering if anyone has answered the question that started all this..... maybe I missed something. Just how do they know that they are 98% the same??? The number comes from DNA-DNA Hybridization. Human to Human DNA uncoils and separates at a given temperature. DNA from two species can be combined, then when heat is applied they will also separate, but not at the same temperature. Chimp and Human DNA separates at 98% of the temp that human to human DNA separates. As I mentioned a few posts ago, this mothod is now giving way to sequencing, but my point was more about meta data than data. It is absurd to say that we share the same dna just because of temperature separations..... What does the sequencing show? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jerryR34 Posted February 28, 2014 Group: Removed from Forums for Breaking Terms of Service Followers: 0 Topic Count: 18 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 588 Content Per Day: 0.15 Reputation: 82 Days Won: 2 Joined: 11/22/2013 Status: Offline Birthday: 11/12/1969 Author Share Posted February 28, 2014 well, I'm wondering if anyone has answered the question that started all this..... maybe I missed something. Just how do they know that they are 98% the same??? The number comes from DNA-DNA Hybridization. Human to Human DNA uncoils and separates at a given temperature. DNA from two species can be combined, then when heat is applied they will also separate, but not at the same temperature. Chimp and Human DNA separates at 98% of the temp that human to human DNA separates. As I mentioned a few posts ago, this mothod is now giving way to sequencing, but my point was more about meta data than data. It is absurd to say that we share the same dna just because of temperature separations..... What does the sequencing show? 90+% We share DNA, just not as much, with all organisms. DNA is just a combination of chemicals - and yes, it does not mean we are related. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gray wolf Posted February 28, 2014 Group: Diamond Member Followers: 2 Topic Count: 28 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 1,046 Content Per Day: 0.27 Reputation: 194 Days Won: 2 Joined: 09/25/2013 Status: Offline Birthday: 09/30/1960 Share Posted February 28, 2014 Which should not be a surprise. After all, we all live in the biosphere. Adam and Eve had the 98% as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 1, 2014 Share Posted March 1, 2014 you answered my queries better than you could ever know. thanks. Be Blessed So then faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the word of God. Romans 10:27 Beloved Now then we are ambassadors for Christ, as though God did beseech you by us: we pray you in Christ's stead, be ye reconciled to God. 2 Corinthians 5:20 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enoch2021 Posted March 4, 2014 Group: Royal Member Followers: 11 Topic Count: 19 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 3,396 Content Per Day: 0.90 Reputation: 730 Days Won: 4 Joined: 12/21/2013 Status: Offline Birthday: 12/26/1963 Share Posted March 4, 2014 Which should not be a surprise. After all, we all live in the biosphere. Adam and Eve had the 98% as well. ===================================================================== We don't share 90% with Chimps LOL, dealt with that here: These tests and comparisons are a joke currently, They're manipulated and fragmented and are only 2 dimensional. The Polyfunctional or 3 Dimensional aspects of DNA are not apart of the equation, which is laughable @ this point. It's Tantamount to measuring Lake Erie and the Pacific Ocean with a hand held straight edge.... then concluding they're similar because both contain water. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts