More evidence of Noah's Flood?

[Sheniy]

Thus Biblical interpretation yielded to the sciences.

 Baloney.

The Bible always yields to science and chases after secular morality....the bible was written for men who did not understand the things we do today.  It will always be playing catch-up...I think God planned it that way.

More baloney from a little man who doesn't know beans about the Bible.

Shiloh, that was mean.

Jerry, what do you mean when you say the bible chases after secular morality? Can you give me some examples?

[Enoch2021]

 

 

 

====================================================================

 

I am really trying to understand your logic, Enoch.

 

Can't explain it any simpler than I already have.  Go back up and read it slowly

[Sheniy]

 

 

====================================================================

 

I am really trying to understand your logic, Enoch.

 

Can't explain it any simpler than I already have.  Go back up and read it slowly

I read it. It doesn't match your actions. Please explain.

[Enoch2021]

As someone pointed out, the ancients drew pictures of many fanciful things just like we still do.  Don't you think we should have some corroborating physical evidence, or do you put primitive art above modern science?

 

 

 

Oh, did you know that they still teach science to kids in school that has been disproven a long time ago?

 

your point?

 

============================================================================

 

 

As someone pointed out, the ancients drew pictures of many fanciful things just like we still do.  Don't you think we should have some corroborating physical evidence, or do you put primitive art above modern science?

 

 

Do you mean like the "corroborating evidence" found in every single Natural History Museum on the Planet that matches the same said Drawings/Sculptures/Architecture? 

 

Those ones????

[Sheniy]

Be wary of some of the teachings of the RCC, but don't throw out the wheat with the chaff.

 

Please spare me your "Generalized" Cliche type advice.   This specific topic advice is Tantamount to Richard Simmons helping Tiger Woods on his backswing.  Did it ever occur to you that I may have some "Background" in this Genre?  Maybe?  And not just the "Being Raised" in it, type of Background?

Thou hast piqued my interest. Care to elaborate? I would like to understand your perspective better.

[jerryR34]

 

As someone pointed out, the ancients drew pictures of many fanciful things just like we still do.  Don't you think we should have some corroborating physical evidence, or do you put primitive art above modern science?

 

 

 

Oh, did you know that they still teach science to kids in school that has been disproven a long time ago?

 

your point?

 

============================================================================

 

 

As someone pointed out, the ancients drew pictures of many fanciful things just like we still do.  Don't you think we should have some corroborating physical evidence, or do you put primitive art above modern science?

 

 

Do you mean like the "corroborating evidence" found in every single Natural History Museum on the Planet that matches the same said Drawings/Sculptures/Architecture? 

 

Those ones????

.

Nope, I mean physical evidence of Humans and dinosaurs together.  Eye-witness accounts are notoriously erroneous.  Like I said before, humans can and have imagined and drawn all kinds of fanciful things.  Would you take them all to be evidence?  Humans are also very susceptible to hallucination

[a-seeker]

 

How does Science deal with the problem of loads of water over our heads (not clouds)?

 

clb

 

Several theories attempt to explain this.

 

The upper vapor canopy (which granted longer life on earth) collapsed and is locked away in polar ice caps, soaked back into the ground (as some have mentioned here already) or are in the weather cycle. The vaults that were under the oceans collapsed and the deeper ocean floor drew down much of the water, and the mountains might not have been as high as they are today (meaning a global sea level high enough to cover the mountain peaks then would not have to be as high as it would be today. Some theories include the ice age itself drew up a lot of the water and yet another theory was that the moon may have been in a less stable orbit and drew the tide to super height on one side of the globe at a time.

 

Don't let atheistic superficial science give you any reason to worry.

 

Thanks for the encouragement

 

But I am not at all worried.  My faith is well grounded.  I simply do not take the literalist view of Genesis 1 and 2.  Nothing of my faith is rattled.

 

clb

[Enoch2021]

Nope, I mean physical evidence of Humans and dinosaurs together.  Eye-witness accounts are notoriously erroneous.  Like I said before, humans can and have imagined and drawn all kinds of fanciful things.  Would you take them all to be evidence?  Humans are also very susceptible to hallucination

 

 

 

=============================================================

 

There comes a point when explaining the mechanics of  2 + 2= 4, that it's utterly meaningless to go any further.

 

We're Well Beyond that point here.

 

So roll with what you got Jerry

[anthonyjmcgirr]

As someone pointed out, the ancients drew pictures of many fanciful things just like we still do.  Don't you think we should have some corroborating physical evidence, or do you put primitive art above modern science?

 

 

 

Oh, did you know that they still teach science to kids in school that has been disproven a long time ago?

 

your point?

 

Really?  You actually have PHYSICAL proof, not theories that scientists have, actual, physical proof of humans and dinosaurs living together and you just shrug your shoulders and say 'modern science' as if it's superior.  Modern science has no physical proof, just inaccurate tests based on wild assumptions.  People crown modern science as if it's almighty and my point being that kids today are taught theories that have already changed and changed again.  It's been ten years since I graduated high school and science has changed dramatically since then and continues to change. 

 

I see atheists mock the bible.  "Oh, the bible says this tribe existed, but there's no proof" and then a few years later archeology finds the evidence.  The more we uncover, the more I am certain that the God of the bible is real and the bible is historically accurate, including man living side-by-side with dinosaurs. 

 

If you have physical proof of something, why just deny it because it doesn't fit your theory?  It actually means that theory is wrong and it's time to go back to the drawing board, not stick your fingers in your ears and scream "I'm not listening!"

[Enoch2021]

Really?  You actually have PHYSICAL proof, not theories that scientists have, actual, physical proof of humans and dinosaurs living together and you just shrug your shoulders and say 'modern science' as if it's superior.  Modern science has no physical proof, just inaccurate tests based on wild assumptions.  People crown modern science as if it's almighty and my point being that kids today are taught theories that have already changed and changed again.  It's been ten years since I graduated high school and science has changed dramatically since then and continues to change. 

 

I see atheists mock the bible.  "Oh, the bible says this tribe existed, but there's no proof" and then a few years later archeology finds the evidence.  The more we uncover, the more I am certain that the God of the bible is real and the bible is historically accurate, including man living side-by-side with dinosaurs. 

 

If you have physical proof of something, why just deny it because it doesn't fit your theory?  It actually means that theory is wrong and it's time to go back to the drawing board, not stick your fingers in your ears and scream "I'm not listening!"

 

 

 

====================================================================

 

 

Anthony very well said.

 

 

I can't wait to hear what you have to say when the:  "Baby Kracken"  then The "Kracken" is released......Hopefully within 2 weeks.  It will all crumble into a heaping pile of what it really is.

 

Stay Tuned