Jump to content
IGNORED

Molecular Science Versus the Holy Spirit


SavedOnebyGrace

Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  11
  • Topics Per Day:  0.04
  • Content Count:  4,059
  • Content Per Day:  14.09
  • Reputation:   5,193
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  07/30/2023
  • Status:  Offline

Science is breaking down the molecules of the universe, of life to basic atomic particles and subatomic particles.  But science cannot explain life.  God breathed into Adam and he became a living soul.  How does science explain the difference if the animate and inanimate are all made from the same molecules down to the subatomic level?

Edited by Nobody-2441
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Diamond Member
  • Followers:  2
  • Topic Count:  92
  • Topics Per Day:  0.03
  • Content Count:  2,054
  • Content Per Day:  0.60
  • Reputation:   1,753
  • Days Won:  4
  • Joined:  12/09/2014
  • Status:  Offline

Atheistic Science has no reason.  It cannot explain the why. It also cannot explain how all of this order exploded into being

 

Like everything and everyone else...science without God is lost, and needs desperately to find God, to make any sense at all.

 

You know how there is very little noise about quantum physics?  I think the people who delve into see the fingerprints of God....and run away

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Atheistic Science has no reason.... 

 

It cannot explain the why....

 

It also cannot explain....

 

how all of this order exploded into being

 

 

Like everything and everyone else  science without God is lost....

 

and needs desperately to find God....

 

to make any sense at all

 

 

You know how there is very little noise about quantum physics....

 

I think the people who delve into it....

 

see the fingerprints of God....

 

and run away

 

:thumbsup:

 

And I Think

When Some Folk Delve Into Quantum Physics

While Trying To Exclude The God Of Creation, Jesus...They Start To Talk In Gibberish

 

He hath made every thing beautiful in his time: also he hath set the world in their heart, so that no man can find out the work that God maketh from the beginning to the end. Ecclesiastes 3:11

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  11
  • Topics Per Day:  0.04
  • Content Count:  4,059
  • Content Per Day:  14.09
  • Reputation:   5,193
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  07/30/2023
  • Status:  Offline

Atheistic Science has no reason.  It cannot explain the why. It also cannot explain how all of this order exploded into being

 

Like everything and everyone else...science without God is lost, and needs desperately to find God, to make any sense at all.

 

You know how there is very little noise about quantum physics?  I think the people who delve into see the fingerprints of God....and run away

Order is contrary to science.  Everything is subject to chaos.  Erosion, decay and death are our future without God.  Very good observation and post.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Nonbeliever
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  0
  • Topics Per Day:  0
  • Content Count:  5
  • Content Per Day:  0.00
  • Reputation:   3
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  01/17/2015
  • Status:  Offline

This is what is sometimes termed "the God of the gaps" argument, and it is one that apologists make at their peril.

For those not familiar with this line of reasoning, it goes like this: Science can not explain X, therefore Yahweh did it.

 

The first problem with arguing this way is that the argument works equally well ( or poorly ) if one replaces 'Yahweh" with Allah, or Lord Brahma or any of the thousands of dead Gods that now lie on that scrapheap of history we call mythology,

 

Secondly, since the body of knowledge we wrest from mute nature via the scientific method is ever increasing, the places where one can interject the tinkerings of a deity are fewer each day.

 

It is child's play for even a semi-educated person to come up with a list of phenomena that used to be attributed to some invisible entity or other which now are understood through science by everyone save a few benighted souls in the wilds of Africa. 

 

In the time when the Bible was written diseases were attributed to demonic possession or the wrath of the divine until we discovered microorganisms. Few people now will opt for an exorcism instead of a shot of antibiotics to cure their pneumonia.

 

Until quite recently all well-thinking people knew that earthquakes, as well as lightning,  were God's punishment for sinful shenanigans, until we understood that we're living on a cooling crust and discovered plate tectonics.

 

In the Middle Ages, the mentally ill were beaten with sticks as it was imagined this would vacate the demons that resided in these poor people. To my knowledge this cure is no longer in fashion in our psychiatric hospitals.

 

So be very careful using this line of defense for your religious beliefs. In the fullness of time it is a losing strategy.

 

Sam

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  7
  • Topic Count:  867
  • Topics Per Day:  0.24
  • Content Count:  7,331
  • Content Per Day:  1.99
  • Reputation:   2,860
  • Days Won:  31
  • Joined:  04/09/2014
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  04/28/1964

The scientific method is actually derived from the Bible. Christianity is the only World belief whose creation theory follows the scientific method.

There is nothing wrong with science. Science is good, the problem lies with scientists.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Nonbeliever
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  0
  • Topics Per Day:  0
  • Content Count:  5
  • Content Per Day:  0.00
  • Reputation:   3
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  01/17/2015
  • Status:  Offline

The scientific method is actually derived from the Bible. Christianity is the only World belief whose creation theory follows the scientific method.

There is nothing wrong with science. Science is good, the problem lies with scientists.

 

This is one of the reasons why I never tire of having discussions with the religious; you never know what they are going to say next.

 

Would you be so kind as to elaborate on your rather esoteric theory that we derive the scientific method from the Bible ?

 

Sam

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Worthy Ministers
  • Followers:  29
  • Topic Count:  599
  • Topics Per Day:  0.08
  • Content Count:  56,254
  • Content Per Day:  7.56
  • Reputation:   27,983
  • Days Won:  271
  • Joined:  12/29/2003
  • Status:  Offline

 

The scientific method is actually derived from the Bible. Christianity is the only World belief whose creation theory follows the scientific method.

There is nothing wrong with science. Science is good, the problem lies with scientists.

 

This is one of the reasons why I never tire of having discussions with the religious; you never know what they are going to say next.

 

Would you be so kind as to elaborate on your rather esoteric theory that we derive the scientific method from the Bible ?

 

Sam

 

You might try and read "Genesis and the Big Bang"  written by Gerald Schroeder   PhD..      I don't have the time nor the inclination to go through a multiple hundred page book to point out all the ways, but he does a pretty good job. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Nonbeliever
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  0
  • Topics Per Day:  0
  • Content Count:  5
  • Content Per Day:  0.00
  • Reputation:   3
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  01/17/2015
  • Status:  Offline

 

 

The scientific method is actually derived from the Bible. Christianity is the only World belief whose creation theory follows the scientific method.

There is nothing wrong with science. Science is good, the problem lies with scientists.

 

This is one of the reasons why I never tire of having discussions with the religious; you never know what they are going to say next.

 

Would you be so kind as to elaborate on your rather esoteric theory that we derive the scientific method from the Bible ?

 

Sam

 

You might try and read "Genesis and the Big Bang"  written by Gerald Schroeder   PhD..      I don't have the time nor the inclination to go through a multiple hundred page book to point out all the ways, but he does a pretty good job. 

 

This is confusing. You thought it necessary to inform us of a book you like, but in the next sentence you announce that you do not have the inclination to tell us about it.

 

Sam

 

 

 

Sam

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...