OldSchool2 Posted February 10, 2015 Group: Royal Member Followers: 7 Topic Count: 701 Topics Per Day: 0.13 Content Count: 7,511 Content Per Day: 1.35 Reputation: 1,759 Days Won: 0 Joined: 01/16/2009 Status: Offline Birthday: 02/18/1955 Share Posted February 10, 2015 from The American Spectator:"Barack Obama has one final year to realize that the National Prayer Breakfast just isn’t a good venue for him. Obama’s track record at the annual function has been little other than disastrous, and another president—one with a more hostile media and a less dedicated constituency—would have been ruined already by previous catastrophes."Obama’s problems with the National Prayer Breakfast began in earnest in 2012, when the keynote speech at the affair was given by author Eric Metaxas. The speech Metaxas gave in advance of Obama’s own address was a tour de force and an indictment, though a polite one, of Obama’s position on abortion and other social issues as decisively anti-Christian. Metaxas stole the show and left Obama giving a speech that had been thoroughly repudiated from the same podium just minutes earlier, about how Christianity included essentially the same moral framework as Hinduism or Islam...."http://spectator.org/articles/61729/obamas-historical-ignorance-and-disdain-faith"Christianity has been perhaps the single most aggressive force in civilizing human beings in our history. To so brazenly insult those sharing that identity by bringing us down to the level of the Islamic State is an outrage. Christians must of course turn the other cheek in response; there is nothing else to do. But can we be blamed for wondering about Obama’s loyalty to, or even knowledge of, the faith he claims to hold? If instead of defending the civilization Christ inspired he can only mount his high horse to lecture us that we’re no better than the jihadists, what are we to conclude?"We can conclude that whatever faith Obama lays claim to, he remains an Islamic sycophant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tinky Posted February 10, 2015 Group: Diamond Member Followers: 1 Topic Count: 200 Topics Per Day: 0.04 Content Count: 1,602 Content Per Day: 0.30 Reputation: 291 Days Won: 8 Joined: 10/24/2009 Status: Offline Birthday: 01/01/1986 Share Posted February 10, 2015 No Christian would praise any other religion. All other religions lead people to hell. To defend other religions is to encourage people into hell. By his "fruit" alone, it is easy to judge that Obama is no Christian. Also, no Christian would encourage abortion and homosexuality as he does Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Qnts2 Posted February 10, 2015 Group: Royal Member Followers: 3 Topic Count: 20 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 2,875 Content Per Day: 0.71 Reputation: 1,336 Days Won: 9 Joined: 03/13/2013 Status: Offline Share Posted February 10, 2015 I agree that Obama is not a Christian. He knows little to nothing about Christianity. It is not a Christian concept to compare one sin against another and proclaim that a sin is not so bad because others also sinned the worse sin. There is nothing so un-Christian. Christianity views all sin as falling short of God, missing the mark. All sin, with no savior, has the same result. But, it is the unsaved human condition to try to self justify by comparing themselves to another to prove their own goodness in comparison. Even the worst criminals in jail have a line they will not cross, and use their unwillingness to cross that line to show their goodness. In prison, child molestation is the sin line most will not cross, so those guilty of mass murder and torture who will not molest a child, have claims of their goodness for not crossing the line. At the same time, the article is sugar coating the crusades. From the article: 'That the Crusades centered upon retaking the Holy Land could hardly be seen as unreasonable: what religion’s adherents wouldn’t want to control the place of its birth?' Really? The scriptures have given the land of Israel to the Jewish people. It was not given to Christians. There is no biblical justification for Christianity to kill the Jewish people to conquer and control the so called 'Holy land'. That statement is just a justification for disobeying scripture, and murdering the people to whom God gave the land. The article also says: 'Interestingly enough, Muslims to this day occupy every city vital to the formation of Christianity except for Jerusalem, and none of those other cities enjoy the standard of living, human rights, or basic freedoms available throughout the Western world.' Another 'misinformation'. It looks like Christianity is claiming the standard of living, human rights and basic freedoms available in Israel. In reality, Jewish people setup the constitution of Israel, and worked hard to raise a standard of living, maintain human rights and basic freedom. And it ultimately was God who brought the land of Israel under Jewish control. Sorry all, but the artical is lame. Some countries grouped together and defended themselves against the Muslims in the name of Jesus, but the actions against the Jewish people, who were living scattered in multiple countries, did not have an army, and were not aggressors, are unjustifiable. The effort to take the land of Israel, which was not Christian land, and was not any kind of defense is also unjustifiable. Especially when the crusaders treatment of the Jewish people was far worse. Islamic countries today, are the more backwords countries, with a lot of violations of human rights, and barbaric methods. That sin stands alone. That sin is being commited by non-Christians. There is no biblical justification to compare that sin to say another group as better or worse. It is when people start to compare sins when others will remind them that they are also sinners. The crusades were not Godly, but resulted in the sin of murder of innocents, torture of innocents, rape of innocents, theft, etc etc etc. The crusaders did not follow scripture and were not obedient to God. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roman150 Posted February 10, 2015 Group: Advanced Member Followers: 2 Topic Count: 7 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 128 Content Per Day: 0.04 Reputation: 44 Days Won: 0 Joined: 12/04/2014 Status: Offline Birthday: 10/14/1958 Share Posted February 10, 2015 (edited) We can conclude that whatever faith Obama lays claim to, he remains an Islamic sycophant. Christianity is *the* institution that the left and its mouthpiece dujour, Obama, despise the most. It is the foundation of Western Civilization, and as any university will tell ya, that's a bad, bad thing. Edited February 10, 2015 by Roman150 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ayin jade Posted February 10, 2015 Group: Worthy Ministers Followers: 44 Topic Count: 6,178 Topics Per Day: 0.88 Content Count: 43,795 Content Per Day: 6.21 Reputation: 11,243 Days Won: 58 Joined: 01/03/2005 Status: Offline Share Posted February 10, 2015 If he really wanted to make Christianity look bad, all he had to do was point to latin america in recent times, where mexico is engaged in genocide of certain indian groups, to argentina where 30,000 people disappeared in the 7 yrs of one dictatorship etc. However it is clear that in his speech he is kowtowing to his muslim buddies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest shiloh357 Posted February 10, 2015 Share Posted February 10, 2015 It's not just a disdain for our faith. It is also a complete moral indifference to the violence of ISIS and other terrorist groups. Other countries' leaders are angered when one of their people is beheaded. Our president fist bumps his buddies on the golf course. In fact, four Americans have currently died at the hands of ISIS and Obama has been entirely indifferent. Islamic extremism/violence is no big deal to him. The fact that we have ISIS in every state but Alaska at this time is much ado about nothing. When there is a massive terrorist strike inside the US in the near future, he will lecture us about why we deserved it and will find a way to blame it on Bush. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
missmuffet Posted February 10, 2015 Group: Royal Member Followers: 34 Topic Count: 1,991 Topics Per Day: 0.48 Content Count: 48,689 Content Per Day: 11.80 Reputation: 30,343 Days Won: 226 Joined: 01/11/2013 Status: Offline Share Posted February 10, 2015 It's not just a disdain for our faith. It is also a complete moral indifference to the violence of ISIS and other terrorist groups. Other countries' leaders are angered when one of their people is beheaded. Our president fist bumps his buddies on the golf course. In fact, four Americans have currently died at the hands of ISIS and Obama has been entirely indifferent. Islamic extremism/violence is no big deal to him. The fact that we have ISIS in every state but Alaska at this time is much ado about nothing. When there is a massive terrorist strike inside the US in the near future, he will lecture us about why we deserved it and will find a way to blame it on Bush. I agree shiloh.And look at the way Jordan responded to their pilot being executed.I do not see Obama reacting in that way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OakWood Posted February 10, 2015 Group: Royal Member Followers: 7 Topic Count: 867 Topics Per Day: 0.24 Content Count: 7,331 Content Per Day: 2.00 Reputation: 2,860 Days Won: 31 Joined: 04/09/2014 Status: Offline Birthday: 04/28/1964 Share Posted February 10, 2015 It's not just a disdain for our faith. It is also a complete moral indifference to the violence of ISIS and other terrorist groups. Other countries' leaders are angered when one of their people is beheaded. Our president fist bumps his buddies on the golf course. In fact, four Americans have currently died at the hands of ISIS and Obama has been entirely indifferent. Islamic extremism/violence is no big deal to him. The fact that we have ISIS in every state but Alaska at this time is much ado about nothing. When there is a massive terrorist strike inside the US in the near future, he will lecture us about why we deserved it and will find a way to blame it on Bush. I'm sorry to tell you that Alaska now has its first mosque which was built in 2010. It's possible that ISIS may well have crept into there too. It wouldn't surprise me - they're everywhere (except on Mars). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alaska#Religion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest shiloh357 Posted February 10, 2015 Share Posted February 10, 2015 I would not be surprised Oak. @bopeep: Yes, that's true. He didn't even act angry or outraged. He does not really care for the US at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OakWood Posted February 10, 2015 Group: Royal Member Followers: 7 Topic Count: 867 Topics Per Day: 0.24 Content Count: 7,331 Content Per Day: 2.00 Reputation: 2,860 Days Won: 31 Joined: 04/09/2014 Status: Offline Birthday: 04/28/1964 Share Posted February 10, 2015 It's not just a disdain for our faith. It is also a complete moral indifference to the violence of ISIS and other terrorist groups. Other countries' leaders are angered when one of their people is beheaded. Our president fist bumps his buddies on the golf course. In fact, four Americans have currently died at the hands of ISIS and Obama has been entirely indifferent. Islamic extremism/violence is no big deal to him. The fact that we have ISIS in every state but Alaska at this time is much ado about nothing. When there is a massive terrorist strike inside the US in the near future, he will lecture us about why we deserved it and will find a way to blame it on Bush. I agree shiloh.And look at the way Jordan responded to their pilot being executed.I do not see Obama reacting in that way. No Obama doesn't react to things like that. Now if a Muslim living in the U.S. had been offended by a comment that somebody had made then Obama would react. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts