Ezra Posted December 18, 2015 Group: Royal Member Followers: 16 Topic Count: 134 Topics Per Day: 0.04 Content Count: 8,142 Content Per Day: 2.34 Reputation: 6,612 Days Won: 20 Joined: 11/02/2014 Status: Offline Share Posted December 18, 2015 Evolutionary "science" is corroborating that something significant happened 6,000 years ago. They call it an "ecosystem shift". Christians call it Creation. http://www.newsmax.com/TheWire/ecosystem-shift-blame-humans/2015/12/18/id/706324/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SavedOnebyGrace Posted December 18, 2015 Group: Royal Member Followers: 0 Topic Count: 11 Topics Per Day: 0.04 Content Count: 4,059 Content Per Day: 14.19 Reputation: 5,193 Days Won: 0 Joined: 07/30/2023 Status: Offline Share Posted December 18, 2015 How many threads do we need covering the first few verses of Genesis? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ezra Posted December 18, 2015 Group: Royal Member Followers: 16 Topic Count: 134 Topics Per Day: 0.04 Content Count: 8,142 Content Per Day: 2.34 Reputation: 6,612 Days Won: 20 Joined: 11/02/2014 Status: Offline Author Share Posted December 18, 2015 1 minute ago, Saved.One.by.Grace said: How many threads do we need covering the first few verses of Genesis? The point of this thread is to see how evolutionists have now concluded that something significant happened 6,000 years ago. That is not old news. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SavedOnebyGrace Posted December 18, 2015 Group: Royal Member Followers: 0 Topic Count: 11 Topics Per Day: 0.04 Content Count: 4,059 Content Per Day: 14.19 Reputation: 5,193 Days Won: 0 Joined: 07/30/2023 Status: Offline Share Posted December 18, 2015 I agree and just to remind everyone, I am not a supporter of evolution either although I do believe in an old Earth. I look forward to reading the link above, hopefully tonight. God Bless, SObG Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MorningGlory Posted December 18, 2015 Group: Royal Member Followers: 0 Topic Count: 1,022 Topics Per Day: 0.16 Content Count: 39,193 Content Per Day: 6.09 Reputation: 9,977 Days Won: 78 Joined: 10/01/2006 Status: Offline Share Posted December 18, 2015 23 minutes ago, Ezra said: The point of this thread is to see how evolutionists have now concluded that something significant happened 6,000 years ago. That is not old news. Maybe they finally get it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ezra Posted December 18, 2015 Group: Royal Member Followers: 16 Topic Count: 134 Topics Per Day: 0.04 Content Count: 8,142 Content Per Day: 2.34 Reputation: 6,612 Days Won: 20 Joined: 11/02/2014 Status: Offline Author Share Posted December 18, 2015 2 hours ago, MorningGlory said: Maybe they finally get it? Or will they be like the left-liberals saying Radical Islam does not exist even as they get slaughtered? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SavedOnebyGrace Posted December 20, 2015 Group: Royal Member Followers: 0 Topic Count: 11 Topics Per Day: 0.04 Content Count: 4,059 Content Per Day: 14.19 Reputation: 5,193 Days Won: 0 Joined: 07/30/2023 Status: Offline Share Posted December 20, 2015 On 12/18/2015 at 3:25 PM, Ezra said: Evolutionary "science" is corroborating that something significant happened 6,000 years ago. They call it an "ecosystem shift". Christians call it Creation. http://www.newsmax.com/TheWire/ecosystem-shift-blame-humans/2015/12/18/id/706324/ This really doesn't support a 6000 year old Earth hypothesis. I'm not sure what you think this article suggests. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ezra Posted December 20, 2015 Group: Royal Member Followers: 16 Topic Count: 134 Topics Per Day: 0.04 Content Count: 8,142 Content Per Day: 2.34 Reputation: 6,612 Days Won: 20 Joined: 11/02/2014 Status: Offline Author Share Posted December 20, 2015 46 minutes ago, Saved.One.by.Grace said: This really doesn't support a 6000 year old Earth hypothesis. I'm not sure what you think this article suggests. What the article suggests is that something very significant happened on earth 6,000 years ago. Christians know what happened. Evolutionists will keep dithering around. But now the millions and billions of years are not as significant as 6,000 years. On the other hand, don't expect evolutionists to suddenly say "We were mistaken". "It’s hard to imagine a global force strong enough to change natural patterns that have persisted on Earth for more than 300 million years, but a new study shows that human beings have been doing exactly that for about 6,000 years." That "global force" according to the Bible was God. But for those who refuse to acknowledge the Creator, it is some tkind of mysterious natural force. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SavedOnebyGrace Posted December 20, 2015 Group: Royal Member Followers: 0 Topic Count: 11 Topics Per Day: 0.04 Content Count: 4,059 Content Per Day: 14.19 Reputation: 5,193 Days Won: 0 Joined: 07/30/2023 Status: Offline Share Posted December 20, 2015 17 hours ago, Ezra said: What the article suggests is that something very significant happened on earth 6,000 years ago. Christians know what happened. Evolutionists will keep dithering around. But now the millions and billions of years are not as significant as 6,000 years. On the other hand, don't expect evolutionists to suddenly say "We were mistaken". "It’s hard to imagine a global force strong enough to change natural patterns that have persisted on Earth for more than 300 million years, but a new study shows that human beings have been doing exactly that for about 6,000 years." That "global force" according to the Bible was God. But for those who refuse to acknowledge the Creator, it is some tkind of mysterious natural force. If anything, the article seems to support an OEC, especially The Gap View, and tends to dismiss YEC. That was the point of my comment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bonky Posted December 21, 2015 Group: Nonbeliever Followers: 6 Topic Count: 2 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 738 Content Per Day: 0.20 Reputation: 346 Days Won: 0 Joined: 05/28/2014 Status: Offline Share Posted December 21, 2015 Aside from the 6000 year marker there's nothing from the article that points to a creation event. Now if the article was talking about an explosion of life 6000 years ago I'd see the connection. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts