Will the Antichrist be a misogynist?

[spiderman1917]

Couldn't "no regard for...nor the desire of women" mean he doesn't care what they desire or want, therefore he doesn't care about their rights or see them as human beings?

[Esther4:14]

Every man, whether he is even gay or not, has an opinion towards women.  I think it is very likely that misogynist is a good way to describe the Antichrist; however, it is likely that this will be disguised in some way as a support for equal rights for women, which is only a logical conclusion with a present understanding of history at this point in time.  It is not likely to regress, so the subject of women is something that whoever the Bible speaks of as the man of sin will have to address; more than likely, in a dishonest way.  

But, it will be addressed.  There has never been a male leader in the history of the world that has not had an opinion towards women.  It is just not possible to be an eunuch in this way.  

[HAZARD]

21 hours ago, spiderman1917 said:

I asked the question cuz I have always thought the Devil was a misogynist. In the Garden of Eden he went after the woman. The religion of Islam destroys the lives of hundreds of millions of women. The life of every woman in Saudi Arabia is ruined.  Those women in countries like that who think they have a good life are Sick Puppies.  History has repeated examples of women being treated like animals which still goes on in some countries.

In the Garden of Eden the devil went after the woman not the man.  Women are more beautiful and the devil hates Beauty.

Women have more potential for being a moral compass and are less inclined toward sexual Sins and violence, and as a general rule are more spiritual and the better nurturers. All of these qualities Satan passionately hates. 

And as I said, in the Book of Genesis it says God has placed enmity between the woman and the serpent.

He was a coward and a lier from the beginning. He went after Eve because he was afraid to tackle the one God put in place to rule the Earth, the Head, the man.

Did you know Eve was the first human God created who told the first lie?

She said God commanded this;

 

Gen 3:3, "But of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die."

God said nothing at all about touching the fruit? Touching the fruit was not mentioned by God anywhere in Scripture.

[Guest Thallasa]

10 hours ago, spiderman1917 said:

The Devil seems to have an attack on women that is different than his attack on men as we see it as well with entire governments that in the name of God do not let women leave the house without their husband present, do not let women work or drive, female genital mutilation, the promises 72 virgins in heaven ( no mention of what the women get in heaven) and women are constantly dragged into the streets and stoned to death for crimes the man commits and gets away with it (not to mention many are falsely accused).

Throughout History there have been Governments that permit or straight up require women to be treated like property or animals.

It seems there is a strong attempt by Satan even in our "free world" to turn women into objects.

Of all people on earth, Muhammad was the greatest Antichrist and was a polygamist and pedophile who sanctioned the cruel sex-slavery against non-muslim women that is seen today.

Usually when a culture gets more perverted, Godless, hedonistic, and sociopathic, women become victims and possessions , and there is little regard for their rights.

Usually when Satan gets control of Government, laws stop protecting women , and men get away with using and abusing them.  We can look at satanic countries today and see that.

I would rather die the most cruel death than live a full lifespan on house-arrest as is the lot of all women in Saudi-Arabia.

Just saying that the Devil throughout History oppresses women more than men, and his treatment of them is far different.

The Antichrist will have his own religion and that religion will also include the government. I don't think we see anything more similar to this than Islam which has Government that hates Freedom as much as Nazism did that cannot be separated from the religion.

Islam has been at war with women since it was founded to reduce them to something that is less than human, to strip them of Rights, and to make them the possessions of and dominated by men.  More than 1.4 billion people belong to this religion.

I see in our music, the media, and the pornography industry, a huge movement  to dehumanize and degrade women.

The Devil has a repulsive hideously misogynistic agenda that can obviously be seen and as we see with Islam, Satan delights in men dominating them and preying upon them.

Why do you think this is?

You are correct ,that men who call themselves christian are very often misogynists, or they would cry our more often at the way women are displayed in Western society . I think you are wrong to say that all Islamic culture is worse than so called christian culture ,as in the better ones you have for example the Taj Mahal which was built by ..whose name I do not remember nfor his wife ,and much more . Western society  has done much to destroy the best of Arab culture while encouraging dictators in Saudi (this country is run by the Saudi family which has  Jewish roots ) and Iraq etc   

All the the adverts on Western TV, treat women like prostitutes . In five minutes, at every break they have them naked almost ,writhing on the floor ,etc.  I switch off and hardly watch anymore . 

Well the Devil is male .  Maleness initiâtes ,but women have the children .A man could never be sure that a child was his if he could not control his wife and her actions . Many men have been cuckolded ,especially  when they were away 'hunting' ,or at war  . Many would have only found out later , that the child was not theirs ,so you see a woman who is unfaithful, does a lot of damage to trust in general . Until we become true children of God ,  faithful and honest etc. this terrible condition will not end  .  

[Jayne]

44 minutes ago, HAZARD said:

He was a coward and a lier from the beginning. He went after Eve because he was afraid to tackle the one God put in place to rule the Earth, the Head, the man.

Did you know Eve was the first human God created who told the first lie?

She said God commanded this;

 

Gen 3:3, "But of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die."

God said nothing at all about touching the fruit? Touching the fruit was not mentioned by God anywhere in Scripture.

How could she be lying when she hadn't sinned yet.

[Esther4:14]

3 hours ago, Jayne said:

How could she be lying when she hadn't sinned yet.

I have always wondered about that suggestion myself.  

[HAZARD]

1 hour ago, Esther4:14 said:

I have always wondered about that suggestion myself.  

She put words into God's mouth which He never said. She added to Gods word. Not only did she first then Adam disobey God by eating of the forbidden fruit, before she even ate of it, she touched the fruit which was not a sin to do, but she implied to the serpent that is was forbidden to do so. Had she done nothing more than pick the fruit and look at it, nothing would have been amiss.

God said to Adam;

Gen. 2: 16, And the LORD God commanded the man, saying, Of every tree of the garden thou7 mayest freely eat:
    17, But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die.

No mention of touching the fruit shall cause one to die?

[gdemoss]

15 hours ago, spiderman1917 said:

That is something a misogynist would say

I am a recovering misogynist, thank you

 

[Esther4:14]

36 minutes ago, HAZARD said:

She put words into God's mouth which He never said. She added to Gods word. Not only did she first then Adam disobey God by eating of the forbidden fruit, before she even ate of it, she touched the fruit which was not a sin to do, but she implied to the serpent that is was forbidden to do so. Had she done nothing more than pick the fruit and look at it, nothing would have been amiss.

God said to Adam;

Gen. 2: 16, And the LORD God commanded the man, saying, Of every tree of the garden thou7 mayest freely eat:
    17, But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die.

No mention of touching the fruit shall cause one to die?

Yah, I kind see that as speculation because sin came into the world through disobedience by eating the apple, which they were commanded not to eat, not by lying.  

It is just as easy to speculate that the way to avoid this sin is by not touching the fruit so that you are not tempted to break the command.  

Either way is speculation because the punishment did not come upon mankind through Eve's interpretation of the command requiring that she not touch the fruit, and this interpretation was to her benefit before the serpent continued to convince her to disobey the command of God.  Therefore, it is difficult to make the judgement that Eve's recounting of the command was disobedience on her part.  

[HAZARD]

27 minutes ago, Esther4:14 said:

Yah, I kind see that as speculation because sin came into the world through disobedience by eating the apple, which they were commanded not to eat, not by lying.  

It is just as easy to speculate that the way to avoid this sin is by not touching the fruit so that you are not tempted to break the command.  

Either way is speculation because the punishment did not come upon mankind through Eve's interpretation of the command requiring that she not touch the fruit, and this interpretation was to her benefit before the serpent continued to convince her to disobey the command of God.  Therefore, it is difficult to make the judgement that Eve's recounting of the command was disobedience on her part.  

I never said what she did or said deserved punishment, I said she told the first LIE. God never mentioned touching the fruit? It was eating the fruit that deserved the punishment and that was and is death. The punishment for sin is death. So we can conclude, telling lies is a sin is it not?