Jump to content
IGNORED

White House On Defense After Being Exposed as Architect of Anti-Israel U.N. Action


Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  34
  • Topic Count:  1,991
  • Topics Per Day:  0.48
  • Content Count:  48,689
  • Content Per Day:  11.80
  • Reputation:   30,343
  • Days Won:  226
  • Joined:  01/11/2013
  • Status:  Offline

3 hours ago, Out of the Shadows said:

There has been less evidence shown to support this than there was for the Russian's hacking.  Why is that not an issue this time?

The Russian hacking thing still stays in my mind as a big question mark.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member *
  • Followers:  8
  • Topic Count:  91
  • Topics Per Day:  0.03
  • Content Count:  10,596
  • Content Per Day:  3.69
  • Reputation:   2,743
  • Days Won:  25
  • Joined:  06/16/2016
  • Status:  Offline

3 minutes ago, Davida said:

You only demand links from others, but never supply them yourself.

Have you seen the evidence? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  1,022
  • Topics Per Day:  0.16
  • Content Count:  39,193
  • Content Per Day:  6.11
  • Reputation:   9,977
  • Days Won:  78
  • Joined:  10/01/2006
  • Status:  Offline

3 hours ago, Out of the Shadows said:

There has been less evidence shown to support this than there was for the Russian's hacking.  Why is that not an issue this time?

The Israelis have offered proof to the U.S. Congress that the administration orchestrated this.  I'm sure it will be made public before long.  And it IS an issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  1,022
  • Topics Per Day:  0.16
  • Content Count:  39,193
  • Content Per Day:  6.11
  • Reputation:   9,977
  • Days Won:  78
  • Joined:  10/01/2006
  • Status:  Offline

5 minutes ago, Out of the Shadows said:

Have you seen the evidence? 

You know full well that the evidence has to go to Congress first and has not been released yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest shiloh357
42 minutes ago, missmuffet said:

The Russian hacking thing still stays in my mind as a big question mark.

Yes, even though there is no evidence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  34
  • Topic Count:  1,991
  • Topics Per Day:  0.48
  • Content Count:  48,689
  • Content Per Day:  11.80
  • Reputation:   30,343
  • Days Won:  226
  • Joined:  01/11/2013
  • Status:  Offline

Just now, shiloh357 said:

Yes, even though there is no evidence.

Doesn't mean it did not happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest shiloh357
7 minutes ago, missmuffet said:

Doesn't mean it did not happen.

Yeah, it kind of does.   No evidence, no smoking gun.  Nothing but baseless accusations.   The Russians could not do anything to affect the outcome of our elections, nothing.

The Russians are a scapegoat to avoid any discussion of the contents of the Emails that expose the corruption of the DNC and the liberal media.

I am so sick of this guilty till proven innocent thing.   You think we should punish the Russians over something we have no evidence they did?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  34
  • Topic Count:  1,991
  • Topics Per Day:  0.48
  • Content Count:  48,689
  • Content Per Day:  11.80
  • Reputation:   30,343
  • Days Won:  226
  • Joined:  01/11/2013
  • Status:  Offline

7 minutes ago, shiloh357 said:

Yeah, it kind of does.   No evidence, no smoking gun.  Nothing but baseless accusations.   The Russians could not do anything to affect the outcome of our elections, nothing.

The Russians are a scapegoat to avoid any discussion of the contents of the Emails that expose the corruption of the DNC and the liberal media.

I am so sick of this guilty till proven innocent thing.   You think we should punish the Russians over something we have no evidence they did?

Tell that to a private investigator, FBI or the CIA. That is not always the case. No evidence does not always mean it did not happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest shiloh357
24 minutes ago, missmuffet said:

Tell that to a private investigator, FBI or the CIA. That is not always the case. No evidence does not always mean it did not happen.

There is no case. Neither the FBI or CIA directors have been on TV claiming there was evidence.

Would you like to be subjected to the same presumption of guilt?     Would you like for someone to claim that even though we have no evidence that you committed such-and-such crime, we are going to put you in prison for that crime anyway?   What kind of country would we be if we thought the way you do about the presumption of guilt? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  34
  • Topic Count:  1,991
  • Topics Per Day:  0.48
  • Content Count:  48,689
  • Content Per Day:  11.80
  • Reputation:   30,343
  • Days Won:  226
  • Joined:  01/11/2013
  • Status:  Offline

Just now, shiloh357 said:

There is no case. Neither the FBI or CIA directors have been on TV claiming there was evidence.

Would you like to be subjected to the same presumption of guilt?     Would you like for someone to claim that even though we have no evidence that you committed such-and-such crime, we are going to put you in prison for that crime anyway?   What kind of country would we be if we thought the way you do about the presumption of guilt? 

suit yourself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...