one.opinion Posted December 26, 2017 Group: Royal Member Followers: 6 Topic Count: 29 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 5,240 Content Per Day: 2.10 Reputation: 1,356 Days Won: 4 Joined: 07/03/2017 Status: Offline Share Posted December 26, 2017 38 minutes ago, MorningGlory said: Do y'all think we can get back to the topic? Which is not who is spiritually correct or superior, btw. This is the topic: Distant black hole holds surprises about the early universe Any thoughts on that? Yep, sorry about the tangent. Since I was a child, I’ve been fascinated by black holes. And today, I’m just as impressed and awed by them. Now, I have even a much greater awe and respect for the Creator that made them! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enoch2021 Posted December 26, 2017 Group: Royal Member Followers: 11 Topic Count: 19 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 3,396 Content Per Day: 0.90 Reputation: 730 Days Won: 4 Joined: 12/21/2013 Status: Offline Birthday: 12/26/1963 Share Posted December 26, 2017 1 hour ago, one.opinion said: Since I was a child, I’ve been fascinated by black holes. And today, I’m just as impressed and awed by them. Now, I have even a much greater awe and respect for the Creator that made them! Really? Well since the OP can't SUPPORT their existence, how bout you... a. What Phenomenon was Observed...? b. Post the Formal Scientific Hypothesis then EXPERIMENT that validates your claim...? c. Highlight the "Independent Variable" that was used in the TEST...? d. Post the Null Hypothesis that was Rejected/Falsified...? If you can't answer those (and you can't because they don't and NEVER EXISTED) how bout pointing out 'black holes' in Scripture...? And if you can't accomplish either, THEN...What on Earth are you talking about? regards Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeyondET Posted December 26, 2017 Group: Royal Member Followers: 0 Topic Count: 118 Topics Per Day: 0.05 Content Count: 2,868 Content Per Day: 1.22 Reputation: 816 Days Won: 0 Joined: 11/29/2017 Status: Offline Birthday: 04/01/1968 Share Posted December 26, 2017 (edited) 54 minutes ago, Enoch2021 said: Really? Well since the OP can't SUPPORT their existence, how bout you... a. What Phenomenon was Observed...? b. Post the Formal Scientific Hypothesis then EXPERIMENT that validates your claim...? c. Highlight the "Independent Variable" that was used in the TEST...? d. Post the Null Hypothesis that was Rejected/Falsified...? If you can't answer those (and you can't because they don't and NEVER EXISTED) how bout pointing out 'black holes' in Scripture...? And if you can't accomplish either, THEN...What on Earth are you talking about? regards Well I guess Mars is not a planet it's not mentioned in scipture either yet a person can clearly see it at night with a telescope or with the naked eye at the right time when the planet is close enough. many folks keep God in a box. Edited December 26, 2017 by BeyondET 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MorningGlory Posted December 26, 2017 Group: Royal Member Followers: 0 Topic Count: 1,022 Topics Per Day: 0.16 Content Count: 39,193 Content Per Day: 6.11 Reputation: 9,977 Days Won: 78 Joined: 10/01/2006 Status: Offline Author Share Posted December 26, 2017 1 hour ago, Enoch2021 said: Really? Well since the OP can't SUPPORT their existence, how bout you... a. What Phenomenon was Observed...? b. Post the Formal Scientific Hypothesis then EXPERIMENT that validates your claim...? c. Highlight the "Independent Variable" that was used in the TEST...? d. Post the Null Hypothesis that was Rejected/Falsified...? If you can't answer those (and you can't because they don't and NEVER EXISTED) how bout pointing out 'black holes' in Scripture...? And if you can't accomplish either, THEN...What on Earth are you talking about? regards More repetition will not achieve different results, Enoch. No one has to provide you with evidence of anything. One is simply a reader of the article just as I am a poster of the article. Eduardo Bañados of the Carnegie Institution for Science, who led the research published in the journal Nature is the one you should contact instead of being rude to other posters. Be sure to tell him you know more about the subject than anyone at the Carnegie Institute. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enoch2021 Posted December 26, 2017 Group: Royal Member Followers: 11 Topic Count: 19 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 3,396 Content Per Day: 0.90 Reputation: 730 Days Won: 4 Joined: 12/21/2013 Status: Offline Birthday: 12/26/1963 Share Posted December 26, 2017 3 minutes ago, MorningGlory said: No one has to provide you with evidence of anything. Then your PARROTED claims can be summarily dismissed. Quote One is simply a reader of the article just as I am a poster of the article. Correction: you PARROTED the article. Quote Eduardo Bañados of the Carnegie Institution for Science, who led the research published in the journal Nature is the one you should contact instead of being rude to other posters. It is "YOU" that need to contact "Eduardo". Again, it's not "MY" job to track down SUPPORT for "YOUR" PARROTED claims. ps. Requesting SUPPORT for claims is not being "rude", for goodness sakes. Quote Be sure to tell him you know more about the subject than anyone at the Carnegie Institute. You bring "Eduardo" here and I'll not only tell him, I'll SHOW him. regards Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enoch2021 Posted December 26, 2017 Group: Royal Member Followers: 11 Topic Count: 19 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 3,396 Content Per Day: 0.90 Reputation: 730 Days Won: 4 Joined: 12/21/2013 Status: Offline Birthday: 12/26/1963 Share Posted December 26, 2017 54 minutes ago, BeyondET said: Well I guess Mars is not a planet it's not mentioned in scipture There are no "PLANETS" mentioned in Scripture either. However, I will accept Scientific Evidence (you Wholesale DODGED that part ) ... a. What Phenomenon was Observed...?b. Post the Formal Scientific Hypothesis then EXPERIMENT that validates your claim...?c. Highlight the "Independent Variable" that was used in the TEST...?d. Post the Null Hypothesis that was Rejected/Falsified...? regrads Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MorningGlory Posted December 26, 2017 Group: Royal Member Followers: 0 Topic Count: 1,022 Topics Per Day: 0.16 Content Count: 39,193 Content Per Day: 6.11 Reputation: 9,977 Days Won: 78 Joined: 10/01/2006 Status: Offline Author Share Posted December 26, 2017 9 minutes ago, Enoch2021 said: Then your PARROTED claims can be summarily dismissed. Correction: you PARROTED the article. It is "YOU" that need to contact "Eduardo". Again, it's not "MY" job to track down SUPPORT for "YOUR" PARROTED claims. ps. Requesting SUPPORT for claims is not being "rude", for goodness sakes. You bring "Eduardo" here and I'll not only tell him, I'll SHOW him. regards Still not going to follow up the Institute's research for you. You will have to do that yourself. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enoch2021 Posted December 26, 2017 Group: Royal Member Followers: 11 Topic Count: 19 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 3,396 Content Per Day: 0.90 Reputation: 730 Days Won: 4 Joined: 12/21/2013 Status: Offline Birthday: 12/26/1963 Share Posted December 26, 2017 2 minutes ago, MorningGlory said: Still not going to follow up the Institute's research for you. Then as I said, your PARROTED claims can therefore be summarily dismissed. Quote You Captured the Essence of your Claims. regards Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MorningGlory Posted December 26, 2017 Group: Royal Member Followers: 0 Topic Count: 1,022 Topics Per Day: 0.16 Content Count: 39,193 Content Per Day: 6.11 Reputation: 9,977 Days Won: 78 Joined: 10/01/2006 Status: Offline Author Share Posted December 26, 2017 6 minutes ago, Enoch2021 said: Then as I said, your PARROTED claims can therefore be summarily dismissed. You Captured the Essence of your Claims. regards You can't 'summarily' dismiss me or anyone else; you are just a member here, not the king. And you're not a scientist either from what I have read here. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enoch2021 Posted December 26, 2017 Group: Royal Member Followers: 11 Topic Count: 19 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 3,396 Content Per Day: 0.90 Reputation: 730 Days Won: 4 Joined: 12/21/2013 Status: Offline Birthday: 12/26/1963 Share Posted December 26, 2017 6 minutes ago, MorningGlory said: You can't 'summarily' dismiss me or anyone else; you are just a member here, not the king. You're confused. I'm not summarily dismissing "YOU", I'm summarily dismissing "YOUR CLAIMS". You don't have to be a "King" to summarily dismiss UNSUPPORTED Claims. Just have the ability to Reason. It's akin to somebody claiming the existence of 3 Toed Gnomes. Then challenging that individual to SUPPORT that claim; when they can't, well...the claim can be summarily dismissed. It's not Supernatural and you surely don't have to be Royalty to adjudicate it. regards Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts