Jump to content
IGNORED

Supreme Court Justice Hearings


Recommended Posts

  • Steward

  • Group:  Steward
  • Followers:  110
  • Topic Count:  10,465
  • Topics Per Day:  1.25
  • Content Count:  27,787
  • Content Per Day:  3.33
  • Reputation:   15,483
  • Days Won:  129
  • Joined:  06/30/2001
  • Status:  Online
  • Birthday:  09/21/1971

Screen Shot 2022-03-23 at 10.26.18 AM.jpg

Trump's spokesperson just posted this on her Twitter ... how true it is!

  • Thumbs Up 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Diamond Member
  • Followers:  10
  • Topic Count:  60
  • Topics Per Day:  0.05
  • Content Count:  2,249
  • Content Per Day:  1.93
  • Reputation:   3,104
  • Days Won:  20
  • Joined:  03/02/2021
  • Status:  Offline

She also could not tell us when life begins.  She is not the person for the job.

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • This is Worthy 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  34
  • Topic Count:  1,992
  • Topics Per Day:  0.48
  • Content Count:  48,690
  • Content Per Day:  11.77
  • Reputation:   30,343
  • Days Won:  226
  • Joined:  01/11/2013
  • Status:  Offline

Yes, this is what our world has become. Really quite sad. But it is just the tip of the ice berg. 

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Diamond Member
  • Followers:  10
  • Topic Count:  60
  • Topics Per Day:  0.05
  • Content Count:  2,249
  • Content Per Day:  1.93
  • Reputation:   3,104
  • Days Won:  20
  • Joined:  03/02/2021
  • Status:  Offline

@missmuffet My heart breaks for this lady.  She is so lost.  All I can do for her is pray for the Lord to reveal himself to her.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  34
  • Topic Count:  1,992
  • Topics Per Day:  0.48
  • Content Count:  48,690
  • Content Per Day:  11.77
  • Reputation:   30,343
  • Days Won:  226
  • Joined:  01/11/2013
  • Status:  Offline

1 minute ago, debrakay said:

@missmuffet My heart breaks for this lady.  She is so lost.  All I can do for her is pray for the Lord to reveal himself to her.

That is the first thing we should do with everything in this world that is "lost".

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Worthy Ministers
  • Followers:  14
  • Topic Count:  38
  • Topics Per Day:  0.04
  • Content Count:  4,975
  • Content Per Day:  5.43
  • Reputation:   6,057
  • Days Won:  45
  • Joined:  11/05/2021
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  01/25/1961

This is just so sad.  This kind of lie is very pervasive.  People want to throw away the definitions of Man and Woman.

  • Thumbs Up 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  6
  • Topic Count:  29
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  5,240
  • Content Per Day:  2.09
  • Reputation:   1,356
  • Days Won:  4
  • Joined:  07/03/2017
  • Status:  Offline

Some people are dead set against the nomination, regardless of her qualifications, abilities, and responses. They are actively searching for things to criticize.

Check out this article that explains more than just an out-of-context question and answer.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/03/23/remarkable-bad-faith-involved-what-is-woman-attack/

Checking all the right character boxes apparently only matters for liberals, not conservatives.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Worthy Ministers
  • Followers:  13
  • Topic Count:  279
  • Topics Per Day:  0.21
  • Content Count:  13,107
  • Content Per Day:  9.69
  • Reputation:   13,599
  • Days Won:  149
  • Joined:  08/26/2020
  • Status:  Offline

I am against nomination on the grounds that this woman is not qualified for the job. Period. It isn't that she can't define what a woman is, it's that she won't because there will be battles in the high court in the future over this and to admit she has an agenda would give it away. 

Judges are supposed to follow the constitution not re invent it. 

She was nominated based on her color and her sex.

What if a president had said, " I'm looking for a white man to fill this position"? How about an Indian or an Asian? Since when has a position that decides the law for 330,000,000 people been based on race and gender?

Any thinking president would have looked for QUALIFICATIONS along with a good legacy. What do we have instead? A president who said, " I want a black woman on the Supreme court". Apparently nothing else matters. 

And how would you feel if you were a black woman and you knew the only reason you were nominated was because you are black and/or female? This was Joe's only pre requisite, and he is the president after all. We should never question an executive decision. Scuse me, I choked a little trying to get that last sentence out.

And I agree George, it is the end of our era or the US republic. The writing has been on the wall for some time now. 

 

 

 

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  6
  • Topic Count:  29
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  5,240
  • Content Per Day:  2.09
  • Reputation:   1,356
  • Days Won:  4
  • Joined:  07/03/2017
  • Status:  Offline

34 minutes ago, Starise said:

I am against nomination on the grounds that this woman is not qualified for the job. Period.

On what basis are you issuing this proclamation? I suspect you are making an unequivocal pronouncements regarding areas outside of any expertise. You have done this in other areas recently, and I suggest a proverbial "pumping of the brakes" on these kinds of comments.

In any case, there are quite a few conservative Republicans that have fully endorsed Judge Jackson.

image.png.12e39bf8c4eb447f0dbfe6cc37c9a360.png

https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/press/dem/releases/a-proven-consensus-builder-ketanji-brown-jackson-receives-broad-support-from-across-the-political-spectrum

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...