teddyv Posted September 21, 2022 Group: Royal Member Followers: 6 Topic Count: 6 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 4,265 Content Per Day: 2.92 Reputation: 2,302 Days Won: 1 Joined: 05/03/2020 Status: Offline Share Posted September 21, 2022 @one.opinion I'm not sure why it's even relevant. Theory of evolution, or any other theory will stand or fall on its merit, not on the basis of an adherents religious conviction. Seems like a red herring or a veiled ad hominem. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
one.opinion Posted September 22, 2022 Group: Royal Member Followers: 6 Topic Count: 29 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 5,240 Content Per Day: 2.10 Reputation: 1,356 Days Won: 4 Joined: 07/03/2017 Status: Offline Share Posted September 22, 2022 1 hour ago, teddyv said: Seems like a red herring or a veiled ad hominem. No reason it couldn’t be both… Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sparks Posted September 22, 2022 Group: Worthy Ministers Followers: 23 Topic Count: 28 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 6,159 Content Per Day: 2.03 Reputation: 2,513 Days Won: 8 Joined: 01/20/2016 Status: Offline Share Posted September 22, 2022 1 hour ago, one.opinion said: No reason it couldn’t be both… No reason evolution theory won't fall on it's own 'merits.' It is just another religion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
one.opinion Posted September 22, 2022 Group: Royal Member Followers: 6 Topic Count: 29 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 5,240 Content Per Day: 2.10 Reputation: 1,356 Days Won: 4 Joined: 07/03/2017 Status: Offline Share Posted September 22, 2022 8 hours ago, Sparks said: No reason evolution theory won't fall on it's own 'merits.' It is just another religion. Hmmm… yet somehow, despite all the Kent Hovinds out there, the molecular basis for evolution remains a fact and evidence for broader evolution only strengthens with time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sparks Posted September 22, 2022 Group: Worthy Ministers Followers: 23 Topic Count: 28 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 6,159 Content Per Day: 2.03 Reputation: 2,513 Days Won: 8 Joined: 01/20/2016 Status: Offline Share Posted September 22, 2022 2 hours ago, one.opinion said: Hmmm… yet somehow, despite all the Kent Hovinds out there, the molecular basis for evolution remains a fact and evidence for broader evolution only strengthens with time. The Kent Hovinds destroy your argument, every time. You could learn a lot from Kent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
one.opinion Posted September 22, 2022 Group: Royal Member Followers: 6 Topic Count: 29 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 5,240 Content Per Day: 2.10 Reputation: 1,356 Days Won: 4 Joined: 07/03/2017 Status: Offline Share Posted September 22, 2022 3 hours ago, Sparks said: The Kent Hovinds destroy your argument, every time. You could learn a lot from Kent. This is an empty boast, with nothing to back it up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sparks Posted September 22, 2022 Group: Worthy Ministers Followers: 23 Topic Count: 28 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 6,159 Content Per Day: 2.03 Reputation: 2,513 Days Won: 8 Joined: 01/20/2016 Status: Offline Share Posted September 22, 2022 3 hours ago, one.opinion said: This is an empty boast, with nothing to back it up. Said by the person who has never seen Kent debate. Well, if you think you can beat Kent in a debate, I invite you to try. He debates people online where your answers will be preserved. Put your money where mouth is. Kent has a few rules like equal time for the many he will debate at the same time, no invectives or ad hominems, but you and @teddyv should give it a try. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David1701 Posted September 22, 2022 Group: Royal Member Followers: 8 Topic Count: 15 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 5,731 Content Per Day: 3.54 Reputation: 3,522 Days Won: 12 Joined: 11/27/2019 Status: Offline Share Posted September 22, 2022 8 hours ago, one.opinion said: Hmmm… yet somehow, despite all the Kent Hovinds out there, the molecular basis for evolution remains a fact and evidence for broader evolution only strengthens with time. You mean like the genetic degeneration that should have wiped out humanity long ago, if we had been around for as long as molecules-to-man evolution claims? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
one.opinion Posted September 22, 2022 Group: Royal Member Followers: 6 Topic Count: 29 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 5,240 Content Per Day: 2.10 Reputation: 1,356 Days Won: 4 Joined: 07/03/2017 Status: Offline Share Posted September 22, 2022 37 minutes ago, David1701 said: You mean like the genetic degeneration that should have wiped out humanity long ago, if we had been around for as long as molecules-to-man evolution claims? As always, I'm happy to look at evidence with you. Let's have an evidence-based conversation about this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
one.opinion Posted September 22, 2022 Group: Royal Member Followers: 6 Topic Count: 29 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 5,240 Content Per Day: 2.10 Reputation: 1,356 Days Won: 4 Joined: 07/03/2017 Status: Offline Share Posted September 22, 2022 1 hour ago, Sparks said: Said by the person who has never seen Kent debate. You said earlier that Hovind "destroyed my argument", whatever that means. That's an empty boast since I've never debated him, nor ever plan to. 1 hour ago, Sparks said: Well, if you think you can beat Kent in a debate I have no idea if I can "beat" him in a debate. I'm not interested in "beating" anyone. These "debates" usually boil down to who can talk the fastest and loudest and look the most proud while doing it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts