R. Hartono Posted September 26, 2022 Group: Royal Member Followers: 0 Topic Count: 771 Topics Per Day: 0.34 Content Count: 6,938 Content Per Day: 3.06 Reputation: 1,979 Days Won: 1 Joined: 02/15/2018 Status: Offline Share Posted September 26, 2022 (edited) NIH posted an article/ letter about irreparable damage of Covid treatment by Government, Health Authorities and hospitals : https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34992908/ Poorly designed treatment protocols have killed 6 millions people around the world. As effective drugs are banned and doctors receive threats. Syringe predators are hunting children and toddlers now with billion dollars business shots. https://expose-news.com/2022/08/13/the-miracle-not-heard-around-the-world/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33968948/ https://www.bbc.com/news/health-53061281 This coverage by NIH is meant to educate people. Otherwise what's that for ? Abstract The ongoing "pandemic" involving the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 virus (SARS-CoV-2) has several characteristics that make it unique in the history of pandemics. This entails not only the draconian measures that some countries and individual states within the United States and initiated and made policy, most of which are without precedent or scientific support, but also the completely unscientific way the infection has been handled. For the 1st time in medical history, major experts in virology, epidemiology, infectious diseases, and vaccinology have not only been ignored, but are also demonized, marginalized and in some instances, become the victim of legal measures that can only be characterized as totalitarian. Discussions involving various scientific opinions have been eliminated, top scientists have been frightened into silence by threats to their careers, physicians have lost their licenses, and the concept of early treatment has been virtually eliminated. Hundreds of thousands of people have died needlessly as a result of, in my opinion and the opinion of others, poorly designed treatment protocols, mostly stemming from the Center for Disease Control and Prevention, which have been rigidly enforced among all hospitals. The economic, psychological, and institutional damage caused by these unscientific policies is virtually unmeasurable. Whole generations of young people will suffer irreparable damage, both physical and psychological, possibly forever. The truth must be told. Edited November 13, 2022 by R. Hartono Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
teddyv Posted September 26, 2022 Group: Royal Member Followers: 6 Topic Count: 6 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 4,264 Content Per Day: 2.93 Reputation: 2,302 Days Won: 1 Joined: 05/03/2020 Status: Offline Share Posted September 26, 2022 It's an editorial by an obvious anti-vaxxer. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sparks Posted September 26, 2022 Group: Worthy Ministers Followers: 23 Topic Count: 28 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 6,159 Content Per Day: 2.04 Reputation: 2,513 Days Won: 8 Joined: 01/20/2016 Status: Offline Share Posted September 26, 2022 3 hours ago, teddyv said: It's an editorial by an obvious anti-vaxxer. Yeah, but where was he wrong? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
one.opinion Posted September 26, 2022 Group: Royal Member Followers: 6 Topic Count: 29 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 5,240 Content Per Day: 2.10 Reputation: 1,356 Days Won: 4 Joined: 07/03/2017 Status: Offline Share Posted September 26, 2022 11 hours ago, R. Hartono said: This article posted by NIH is meant to educate people. Otherwise what's that for ? This is not an article, this is a letter to an editor. This is someone with medical credentials given the opportunity to publish their opinion. This is also proof against the oft-used, yet erroneous, claims of censure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sparks Posted September 26, 2022 Group: Worthy Ministers Followers: 23 Topic Count: 28 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 6,159 Content Per Day: 2.04 Reputation: 2,513 Days Won: 8 Joined: 01/20/2016 Status: Offline Share Posted September 26, 2022 Just now, one.opinion said: This is not an article, this is a letter to an editor. This is someone with medical credentials given the opportunity to publish their opinion. This is also proof against the oft-used, yet erroneous, claims of censure. Yeah, but where was he wrong? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R. Hartono Posted September 26, 2022 Group: Royal Member Followers: 0 Topic Count: 771 Topics Per Day: 0.34 Content Count: 6,938 Content Per Day: 3.06 Reputation: 1,979 Days Won: 1 Joined: 02/15/2018 Status: Offline Author Share Posted September 26, 2022 (edited) 10 hours ago, teddyv said: It's an editorial by an obvious anti-vaxxer. Its published by NIH to give better health education to people. Six millions death thats the issue cant you just see the point ? @one.opinion Edited September 26, 2022 by R. Hartono Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R. Hartono Posted September 26, 2022 Group: Royal Member Followers: 0 Topic Count: 771 Topics Per Day: 0.34 Content Count: 6,938 Content Per Day: 3.06 Reputation: 1,979 Days Won: 1 Joined: 02/15/2018 Status: Offline Author Share Posted September 26, 2022 6 hours ago, one.opinion said: This is not an article, this is a letter to an editor. This is someone with medical credentials given the opportunity to publish their opinion. This is also proof against the oft-used, yet erroneous, claims of censure. A letter is an article what's the big deal. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
one.opinion Posted September 27, 2022 Group: Royal Member Followers: 6 Topic Count: 29 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 5,240 Content Per Day: 2.10 Reputation: 1,356 Days Won: 4 Joined: 07/03/2017 Status: Offline Share Posted September 27, 2022 1 hour ago, R. Hartono said: Its published by NIH to give better health education to people. Six millions death thats the issue cant you just see the point ? @one.opinion This is not correct. This was the opinion of a single physician, not the NIH. It was a letter to the editor of a journal. 1 hour ago, R. Hartono said: A letter is an article what's the big deal. No, a letter is not an article. Articles have data and peer review. A letter does not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sparks Posted September 27, 2022 Group: Worthy Ministers Followers: 23 Topic Count: 28 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 6,159 Content Per Day: 2.04 Reputation: 2,513 Days Won: 8 Joined: 01/20/2016 Status: Offline Share Posted September 27, 2022 49 minutes ago, one.opinion said: No, a letter is not an article. Articles have data and peer review. A letter does not. Yeah, but where was the guy wrong? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R. Hartono Posted September 27, 2022 Group: Royal Member Followers: 0 Topic Count: 771 Topics Per Day: 0.34 Content Count: 6,938 Content Per Day: 3.06 Reputation: 1,979 Days Won: 1 Joined: 02/15/2018 Status: Offline Author Share Posted September 27, 2022 (edited) 3 hours ago, one.opinion said: This is not correct. This was the opinion of a single physician, not the NIH. It was a letter to the editor of a journal. No, a letter is not an article. Articles have data and peer review. A letter does not. Why don't you write your opinion to NIH and see if they will publish it in their site or simply dump it into shredder. @teddyv 😀 Edited September 27, 2022 by R. Hartono Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts