Climate Change Is Extremely Political And Agenda Serving, Unfortunately It Is Also True

[Guest]

This is a fact:

The 1991 eruption of Mount Pinatubo in the Philippines spewed enough sunlight-blocking gases into the atmosphere to cool global temperatures by nearly 1 degree over the next two years. Volcanoes can raise or lower the earth's temperature depending on the gases released into the atmosphere and their amount.  Mankind can do nothing about this.  It is out of our control.  We are due for a major eruption somewhere. Think about that affecting global warming/cooling.

[BeyondET]

On 11/7/2022 at 1:37 PM, Sparks said:

They keep resetting the time table whenever they fail a prediction.  I know you want to blame Al Gore alone, because it's easier to say "That guy was wrong (singular)," but you are being lied to by the IPCC.

Years ago I used to follow the C02 reports from a group called SPPI.  They would publish the true readings of all kinds of climate change data, and the truth was pretty much a conformation that global warming was a scam, but I will show you what I mean about misreporting something, and then using the misreporting to make a claim.

So how long does Co2 hang out on the planet?  The answer is about 7 years.  But notice the in graph below (red line), the IPCC claims 100 years.  They stand alone with this assessment. 

The peer-reviewed literature is unanimous in finding that the residence-time of CO2 in the atmosphere is about 7 years. The UN’s climate panel, however, chooses a complex and unsatisfactory definition of residence-time that allows it to pretend that the residence time is in fact 100 years. This is one of many respects in which the climate panel, while claiming to represent the “consensus” of scientific opinion, is in fact entirely at odds with the peer-reviewed literature.  -- SPPI

See how this works?  Claim C02 won't go away for 100 years, and they can make up some real garbage about the planet being consumed by it.

The graft is interesting, from 2002 through 2009 the CO2 steadily went up. The green line seasonal adjusted CO2. If it last only 7 years, it isn't showing any atmospheric loss of CO2. Probably because humans are pumping it out more than the earth can recycle it.

[believeinHim]

[Sparks]

5 hours ago, BeyondET said:

The graft is interesting, from 2002 through 2009 the CO2 steadily went up. The green line seasonal adjusted CO2. If it last only 7 years, it isn't showing any atmospheric loss of CO2. Probably because humans are pumping it out more than the earth can recycle it.

It's not what it seems.  

The SPPI reports always end up showing the IPCC predictions are wrong.  You see a  prediction versus reality, like the graph below.

For almost nine years, global temperatures have been falling rapidly. The IPCC’s predicted warming path (pink region) bears no relation to the global cooling that has been observed in the 21st century to date. Source: SPPI global temperature index.

I think that prior image was mistakenly left behind from a prior report, but shows through the current image, at the time.

[BeyondET]

11 minutes ago, Sparks said:

It's not what it seems.  

The SPPI reports always end up showing the IPCC predictions are wrong.  You see a  prediction versus reality, like the graph below.

For almost nine years, global temperatures have been falling rapidly. The IPCC’s predicted warming path (pink region) bears no relation to the global cooling that has been observed in the 21st century to date. Source: SPPI global temperature index.

I think that prior image was mistakenly left behind from a prior report, but shows through the current image, at the time.

The atmosphere layers react differently depending on the density. In the troposphere, the increase in carbon dioxide leads to a heating effect, while in the stratosphere and mesosphere, it causes a cooling effect. 

[Sparks]

3 minutes ago, BeyondET said:

The atmosphere layers react differently depending on the density. In the troposphere, the increase in carbon dioxide leads to a heating effect, while in the stratosphere and mesosphere, it causes a cooling effect. 

The IPCC is extremely biased, has very inaccurate computer model predictions, uses warped math, with the real goal of taking your money and to get rid of Capitalism.  Cap and Trade is simply wealth redistribution. The idea is about enslavement of the world. 

What's so bad is that every time these stupid 'doomsday' deadlines pass and nothing happens, none of the climate followers remember and then a whole new generation falls for the lies all over again.

 

[BeyondET]

12 hours ago, Sparks said:

The IPCC is extremely biased, has very inaccurate computer model predictions, uses warped math, with the real goal of taking your money and to get rid of Capitalism.  Cap and Trade is simply wealth redistribution. The idea is about enslavement of the world. 

What's so bad is that every time these stupid 'doomsday' deadlines pass and nothing happens, none of the climate followers remember and then a whole new generation falls for the lies all over again.

 

There's more organizations than IPCC it's best to look at multiple studys to get a better understanding.

Edited November 9, 2022 by BeyondET

[Sparks]

35 minutes ago, BeyondET said:

There's more organizations than IPCC it's best to look at multiple studys to get a better understanding.

The better understanding is that there is no Climate Change crisis, and every time they claim there is one, they abysmally fail in their predictions.  Every time they show you their results to get you to panic, realize the math is corrupt or missing.

Since they have never gotten a single prediction right since the 1960s, regardless of group, what makes you think they have it right now?

[Rick-Parker]

The U.N. now wants industrialized nations to give 2 trillion dollars a year to developing countries as "restitution" for "climate change." There ya go!

[one.opinion]

2 hours ago, Rick-Parker said:

The U.N. now wants industrialized nations to give 2 trillion dollars a year to developing countries as "restitution" for "climate change." There ya go!

That sounds like a good idea as long as China is paying their proportionate share!