Jump to content
IGNORED

Reconciling 6 Days with 13.7 Billion Years


SavedOnebyGrace

Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  4
  • Topic Count:  8
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  4,448
  • Content Per Day:  8.16
  • Reputation:   611
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  11/07/2022
  • Status:  Offline

2 hours ago, teddyv said:

My guess is ruin-reconstruction.

No guesses needed.  v.2 says "but the earth became an uninhabitable wasteland".  Therefore, the earth needed a restoration before man's use.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  118
  • Topics Per Day:  0.05
  • Content Count:  2,869
  • Content Per Day:  1.22
  • Reputation:   816
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  11/29/2017
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  04/01/1968

12 minutes ago, FreeGrace said:

I don't know what you mean by accusing me that I "haven't shown what I'm into".  

I'm into the truth.  And the truth is that hayah is RARELY translated as "was" but most commonly translated as "became/become".  That's the truth.

When say stuff like, "you haven't met her" your mind is into something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Diamond Member
  • Followers:  5
  • Topic Count:  16
  • Topics Per Day:  0.03
  • Content Count:  1,335
  • Content Per Day:  2.78
  • Reputation:   614
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  01/11/2023
  • Status:  Offline

18 minutes ago, FreeGrace said:

And the truth is that hayah is RARELY translated as "was" but most commonly translated as "became/become".  That's the truth.

It could be we are looking at one of those rare times.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  3
  • Topic Count:  27
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  5,068
  • Content Per Day:  0.66
  • Reputation:   970
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  06/20/2003
  • Status:  Offline

5 hours ago, FreeGrace said:

Why can't of won't you even try to explain how your evolutionary theory is related to anything in Genesis 1.

How does Genesis concern itself with a change in allele frequencies?    You should realize that there are many things that exist that are not in Genesis.   Or do you reject Genesis outright?

It's not just Genesis that you don't get.   I've asked you twice now to explain the difference between adaptation and biological evolution.   So far, you've declined to do so.   One more time, just so we know:

* What is the scientific definition of biological evolution?

* What is the scientific definition of adaptation?

* What is the difference between adaptation and evolution?

If you're unable to answer this, maybe that's a clue for you.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  4
  • Topic Count:  8
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  4,448
  • Content Per Day:  8.16
  • Reputation:   611
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  11/07/2022
  • Status:  Offline

1 hour ago, BeyondET said:

When say stuff like, "you haven't met her" your mind is into something.

Apparently you miss humor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  118
  • Topics Per Day:  0.05
  • Content Count:  2,869
  • Content Per Day:  1.22
  • Reputation:   816
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  11/29/2017
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  04/01/1968

1 minute ago, FreeGrace said:

Apparently you miss humor.

The sarcasm wasn't hard to miss.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  6
  • Topic Count:  6
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  4,265
  • Content Per Day:  2.92
  • Reputation:   2,302
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  05/03/2020
  • Status:  Offline

1 hour ago, FreeGrace said:

No guesses needed.  v.2 says "but the earth became an uninhabitable wasteland".  Therefore, the earth needed a restoration before man's use.

There are similarities to Gap Theory but I did not think that was what you are advancing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  3
  • Topic Count:  27
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  5,068
  • Content Per Day:  0.66
  • Reputation:   970
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  06/20/2003
  • Status:  Offline

7 hours ago, George said:

If it were so in Genesis 1:1 ... in that case it's simply the earth.  The context is the key.

"Earth" has a number of meanings, pretty much like "eretz."    But "tebel" as far as I can see, means "the world or the known world."    We see this in the NT, also:

2 Peter 3:6 Whereby the world that then was, being overflowed with water, perished:

The word used was "kosmos", meaning "the world" in the sense of "the known world", as in

Luke 2:1 And it came to pass in those days, that there went out a decree from Caesar Augustus that all the world should be taxed.

Luke also uses "kosmos" (world) to mean the Roman Empire.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  4
  • Topic Count:  8
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  4,448
  • Content Per Day:  8.16
  • Reputation:   611
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  11/07/2022
  • Status:  Offline

1 hour ago, NConly said:

FreeGrace said: 

And the truth is that hayah is RARELY translated as "was" but most commonly translated as "became/become".  That's the truth.

It could be we are looking at one of those rare times.

As Gen 1:2 stands, the translation contradicts Isa 45:18 directly.  Either God DID or DID NOT create the earth TOHU (mistranslated in Gen 1:2).

Isa 45:18 - For thus says the LORD, who created the heavens (He is the God who formedthe earth and made it, He established it and did not create it a waste place (TOHU), but formed it to be inhabited ), "I am the LORD, and there is none else.  NASB

Plain as day:  God "did not creat it a waste place".  The Hebrew word "TOHU" is never translated "formless" except in Gen 1:2.  It is translated as "waste", "wasteland" "waste place" and "chaos" elsewhere.

Even the translation "formless" or "without form" is bogus, since EVERY object has form.  There is no such thing as a formless object.  That is impossible.  And there is nothing in Genesis 1 that addresses formlessness.

So, no, this is not one of those rare times.  You can see for yourself at biblehub.com the verses where "hayah" is translated as "was".  Of the 111 verses that have the exact same form of the verb, only 4% were translated as "was", whereas 59% were translated as "became/become".  

One more thing.  The Septuagint is the OT translated into Koine Greek.  While the traditional translation of v.2 begins with the conjunction of continuation (and), the LXX begins v.2 with the conjunction of contrast (but).  

All put together, the traditional translation contradicts Isa 45:18 and cannot be correct.  But using the LXX and the most common translations of the verb 'hayah' and noun 'tohu', there is no contradiction with any verse in the Bible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  4
  • Topic Count:  8
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  4,448
  • Content Per Day:  8.16
  • Reputation:   611
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  11/07/2022
  • Status:  Offline

9 minutes ago, BeyondET said:

The sarcasm wasn't hard to miss.

Then why did you post:  "When say stuff like, "you haven't met her" your mind is into something."

If you didn't miss the humor, why insinuate something foul?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...