Did you know?

[Massorite]

Did you know that a company based out of St Lewis Mo. has developed an ink that can hold ID information? Yes that is right. The ink is put on just like a tattoo with several needles and the information can be read from up tp four feet away by a reader. The bigger the tattoo, the more information it will hold. The companies number one marketing target is the cattle industry. They want to be able to track cattle because of mad cow decease and with the tattoo they can track and locate infected cattle. The companies next marketing target is our very own military personel. We should remember that when the R.F.I.D. (Radio Frequency Identification Device) IE micro chip first came out it could not be read from more then a few feet but today the micro chip can be read from space vie satelite. And the bible says "You shall not buy nor sell unless you except the mark".

If you want to do some research on this just put into your web search "rfid tattoo"

[Deathstar 80]

This isn't too surprising to me. About two weeks ago, I learned that by next year from the show Jack Van Impe Presents (May 18, 2008), that every person is supposed to have either a computer chip on their drivers liscense or to be put in their hand. I was shocked when I heard this. The time is getting closer when Jesus will come, and God's wrath will be poured out onto the earth

Please talk to the lost!!! To get equipped to talk to the lost, you can go to this website.

www.wayofthemaster.com

[buckthesystem]

I came across the following article more than five months ago, but after the negative reaction to articles suggesting that the US military could be considered for having implanted chips instead of dogtags, and peoples' outrage at the suggestion, I dismissed this idea also as "it won't happen".

However, now people seem to be moving more towards "maybe it isn't so bad after all". What do others think? Here's the article:

http://www.informationweek.com/story/showA...cleID=196802844

Invisible RFID Ink Safe For Cattle And People, Company Says

The process developed by Somark involves a geometric array of micro-needles and an ink capsule, which is used to 'tattoo' an animal. The ink can be detected from 4 feet away.

By K.C. Jones, InformationWeek

Jan. 10, 2007

URL: http://www.informationweek.com/story/showA...cleID=196802844

A startup company developing chipless RFID ink has tested its product on cattle and laboratory rats.

Somark Innovations announced this week that it successfully tested biocompatible RFID ink, which can be read through animal hairs. The passive RFID technology could be used to identify and track cows to reduce financial losses from Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (mad cow disease) scares. Somark, which formed in 2005, is located at the Center for Emerging Technologies in St. Louis. The company is raising Series A equity financing and plans to license the technology to secondary markets, which could include laboratory animals, dogs, cats, prime cuts of meat, and military personnel.

Chief scientist Ramos Mays said the tests provide a true proof-of-principle and mitigate most of the technological risks in terms of the product's performance. "This proves the ability to create a synthetic biometric or fake fingerprint with biocompatible, chipless RFID ink and read it through hair," he said.

Co-founder Mark Pydynowski said during an interview Wednesday that the ink doesn't contain any metals and can be either invisible or colored. He declined to say what is in the ink, but said he's certain that it is 100% biocompatible and chemically inert. He also said it is safe for people and animals.

The process developed by Somark involves a geometric array of micro-needles and a reusable applicator with a one-time-use ink capsule. Pydynowski said it takes five to 10 seconds to "stamp or tattoo" an animal, and there is no need to remove the fur. The ink remains in the dermal layer, and a reader can detect it from 4 feet away.

"Conceptually, you can think of it in the same way that visible light is reflected by mirrors," he said, adding that the actual process is slightly different and proprietary.

The amount of information contained in the ink depends on the surface area available, he said. The U.S. Department of Agriculture calls for a 15-digit number to track cattle. The first three digits are "840" for the U.S. country code. The remaining digits are unique identifiers. The numbers would link to a database containing more information.

"It can say where it has been, who it has talked to, who it has eaten with, and who else it has been in contact with," Pydynowski said.

Ranchers and others in the agricultural industry can choose a covert stamping system, which would make it impossible for cattle thieves to tell which animals have been marked and easy for those checking for stolen cattle to determine a cow's source. Pydynowski said the technology is an improvement over ear tags, which can be detached from cows and other products.

The technology could verify that cuts of meat originated in a hormone-free environment, Pydynowski said, adding that consumers would destroy the system by breaking down the ink when chewing the meat. In other words, Big Brother wouldn't know whether someone ate a Big Mac or a filet mignon, according to Pydynowski's explanation. However, the government and agricultural producers and retailers could track e-coli outbreaks in spinach, he said.

The ink also could be used to track and rescue soldiers[/u], Pydynowski said.

"It could help identify friends or foes, prevent friendly fire, and help save soldiers' lives," he said. "It's a very scary proposition when you're dealing with humans, but with military personnel, we're talking about saving soldiers' lives and it may be something worthwhile."

After all when words like "save soldiers' lives" or "rescue soldiers" are used, any innovation previously thought of as horrifying suddenly becomes "possibly acceptable".

[Massorite]

I came across the following article more than five months ago, but after the negative reaction to articles suggesting that the US military could be considered for having implanted chips instead of dogtags, and peoples' outrage at the suggestion, I dismissed this idea also as "it won't happen".

However, now people seem to be moving more towards "maybe it isn't so bad after all". What do others think? Here's the article:

http://www.informationweek.com/story/showA...cleID=196802844

Invisible RFID Ink Safe For Cattle And People, Company Says

The process developed by Somark involves a geometric array of micro-needles and an ink capsule, which is used to 'tattoo' an animal. The ink can be detected from 4 feet away.

By K.C. Jones, InformationWeek

Jan. 10, 2007

URL: http://www.informationweek.com/story/showA...cleID=196802844

A startup company developing chipless RFID ink has tested its product on cattle and laboratory rats.

Somark Innovations announced this week that it successfully tested biocompatible RFID ink, which can be read through animal hairs. The passive RFID technology could be used to identify and track cows to reduce financial losses from Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (mad cow disease) scares. Somark, which formed in 2005, is located at the Center for Emerging Technologies in St. Louis. The company is raising Series A equity financing and plans to license the technology to secondary markets, which could include laboratory animals, dogs, cats, prime cuts of meat, and military personnel.

Chief scientist Ramos Mays said the tests provide a true proof-of-principle and mitigate most of the technological risks in terms of the product's performance. "This proves the ability to create a synthetic biometric or fake fingerprint with biocompatible, chipless RFID ink and read it through hair," he said.

Co-founder Mark Pydynowski said during an interview Wednesday that the ink doesn't contain any metals and can be either invisible or colored. He declined to say what is in the ink, but said he's certain that it is 100% biocompatible and chemically inert. He also said it is safe for people and animals.

The process developed by Somark involves a geometric array of micro-needles and a reusable applicator with a one-time-use ink capsule. Pydynowski said it takes five to 10 seconds to "stamp or tattoo" an animal, and there is no need to remove the fur. The ink remains in the dermal layer, and a reader can detect it from 4 feet away.

"Conceptually, you can think of it in the same way that visible light is reflected by mirrors," he said, adding that the actual process is slightly different and proprietary.

The amount of information contained in the ink depends on the surface area available, he said. The U.S. Department of Agriculture calls for a 15-digit number to track cattle. The first three digits are "840" for the U.S. country code. The remaining digits are unique identifiers. The numbers would link to a database containing more information.

"It can say where it has been, who it has talked to, who it has eaten with, and who else it has been in contact with," Pydynowski said.

Ranchers and others in the agricultural industry can choose a covert stamping system, which would make it impossible for cattle thieves to tell which animals have been marked and easy for those checking for stolen cattle to determine a cow's source. Pydynowski said the technology is an improvement over ear tags, which can be detached from cows and other products.

The technology could verify that cuts of meat originated in a hormone-free environment, Pydynowski said, adding that consumers would destroy the system by breaking down the ink when chewing the meat. In other words, Big Brother wouldn't know whether someone ate a Big Mac or a filet mignon, according to Pydynowski's explanation. However, the government and agricultural producers and retailers could track e-coli outbreaks in spinach, he said.

The ink also could be used to track and rescue soldiers[/u], Pydynowski said.

"It could help identify friends or foes, prevent friendly fire, and help save soldiers' lives," he said. "It's a very scary proposition when you're dealing with humans, but with military personnel, we're talking about saving soldiers' lives and it may be something worthwhile."

After all when words like "save soldiers' lives" or "rescue soldiers" are used, any innovation previously thought of as horrifying suddenly becomes "possibly acceptable".

Alot of people are saying "maybe it won't be so bad" especially the lost or ignorent. The fact of the matter is that it is not a question of if it is a question of when.

[Treasure]

I found this after some searching. news.com.

Edited July 4, 2007 by 4given1

[buckthesystem]

I found this after some searching. news.com.

What is it that you're referring to with this link? It brings up a lot of news items.

[Massorite]

I found this after some searching. news.com.

What is it that you're referring to with this link? It brings up a lot of news items.

It is referring to an ink that can be put on people and animals like a tattoo that can hold ID info just like a micro chip and can be read from up to 4 feet away.

[buckthesystem]

I found this after some searching. news.com.

What is it that you're referring to with this link? It brings up a lot of news items.

It is referring to an ink that can be put on people and animals like a tattoo that can hold ID info just like a micro chip and can be read from up to 4 feet away.

But what is it under? I mean what news item is it? There are several and it is not obvious which one you mean.

[Deathstar 80]

We shouldn't take this chip, even if we're breaking the law. This is kind of strange to me, though. I thought the chips weren't given until after the rapture. Makes you think a little since they're making us receive the chips either on their hand or on their drivers liscense on May 12th or the 18th of next year. I'd say either the rapture is going to happen before that time, or (most likely) they will not make everyone use these chips.

As I said before, please reach the lost. To learn how to reach the lost, go to www.wayofthemaster.com. It really helped me when I talked to people about Jesus, and it seems to be very effective too.

[Him_Crucified330]

I dont think we should be taken away by something that the Gov't wants to do like putting an information chip on everyone. Their not asking you to accept the devil's number on the chip, and their not saying you can't buy or sell without it. And there is no figure from east europe telling us to do so. It's just the govt's way of making people, criminals and common citizens, easier to track.