Fovezer Posted February 10, 2004 Group: Advanced Member Followers: 0 Topic Count: 1 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 305 Content Per Day: 0.04 Reputation: 0 Days Won: 0 Joined: 10/27/2003 Status: Offline Author Share Posted February 10, 2004 NO! Nuff said! Why? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fovezer Posted February 10, 2004 Group: Advanced Member Followers: 0 Topic Count: 1 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 305 Content Per Day: 0.04 Reputation: 0 Days Won: 0 Joined: 10/27/2003 Status: Offline Author Share Posted February 10, 2004 isn't it true though that the so called "missing link" is still missing. Where is that skull or whatever it is that science needs to prove the in between stage of evolution. No ones found it as far as I know. Blessings, Angel H. Heck, it is even from a theistic evolution site Nope. There are countless transtionals. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
refugepsa91 Posted February 10, 2004 Group: Royal Member Followers: 2 Topic Count: 331 Topics Per Day: 0.04 Content Count: 5,961 Content Per Day: 0.76 Reputation: 61 Days Won: 0 Joined: 10/25/2002 Status: Offline Share Posted February 10, 2004 I will look at that site later......although I still believe in genisis!....if all these transitionals have been found what in the world is all the ho-ha about a "missing link".....or do they think thats "bigfoot"? :x: I'm just kidden fovezer! I just couldn't help myself Love and Blessings, Angel H. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fovezer Posted February 10, 2004 Group: Advanced Member Followers: 0 Topic Count: 1 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 305 Content Per Day: 0.04 Reputation: 0 Days Won: 0 Joined: 10/27/2003 Status: Offline Author Share Posted February 10, 2004 I have a question, did all life come from the sea? How does this work? In the past I have caught a lot of fish, and not one of them ever learned to breath air,,,,,,now before you tell me this is not the same, it kinda is, I mean there have to be a first one,,,,,,,also, how come we never see any semi-evolved critters running around and why is science always changing the theory,,,,,,and have never found any proof. I believe that,,,,,,,,In the beginning, God........ Strawman. Instantaneous evolution is not going to happen. It has to be beneficial for than animal to maoveout of its current habitat into a new one. For instance, the sea-creatures that lived near the shore found it beneficial to move onto land, probably because it would be safer and less competition for food, thus beneficial. Amphibians are a perfect transition between fish and reptiles. Semi-evolved creatures? Like half-cats/half-dogs? That would disprove evolution. A really good transitional is Archaeopteryx. There is a lot of evidence for evolution, and changing a theory to better fit the data you obtain only goes to strengthen it. . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fovezer Posted February 10, 2004 Group: Advanced Member Followers: 0 Topic Count: 1 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 305 Content Per Day: 0.04 Reputation: 0 Days Won: 0 Joined: 10/27/2003 Status: Offline Author Share Posted February 10, 2004  I will look at that site later......although I still believe in genisis!....if all these transitionals have been found what in the world is all the ho-ha about a "missing link".....or do they think thats "bigfoot"? :x: I'm just kidden fovezer! I just couldn't help myself Love and Blessings, Angel H. Its the YEC's who are constantly demanding transitionals, then completely ignore those shown, that raise all this hoha about it. LOL! Bigfoot! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Posted February 10, 2004 Group: Junior Member Followers: 2 Topic Count: 10 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 110 Content Per Day: 0.01 Reputation: 0 Days Won: 0 Joined: 10/13/2003 Status: Offline Birthday: 10/04/1959 Share Posted February 10, 2004 I have a question, did all life come from the sea? How does this work? In the past I have caught a lot of fish, and not one of them ever learned to breath air,,,,,,now before you tell me this is not the same, it kinda is, I mean there have to be a first one,,,,,,,also, how come we never see any semi-evolved critters running around and why is science always changing the theory,,,,,,and have never found any proof. I believe that,,,,,,,,In the beginning, God........ Strawman. Instantaneous evolution is not going to happen. It has to be beneficial for than animal to maoveout of its current habitat into a new one. For instance, the sea-creatures that lived near the shore found it beneficial to move onto land, probably because it would be safer and less competition for food, thus beneficial. Amphibians are a perfect transition between fish and reptiles. Semi-evolved creatures? Like half-cats/half-dogs? That would disprove evolution. A really good transitional is Archaeopteryx. There is a lot of evidence for evolution, and changing a theory to better fit the data you obtain only goes to strengthen it. . Stawman? Instantaneous? My point is, there still has to be a first, just because it is benefcial does not mean that beings can "morph" show me any proof that this can happen Semi-evolved creatures, no not cat/dog, well isn't that what you claim archaeopteryx is? Tell me are you familar with the "hopeul monster" theory In my beliefs, it takes faith in God, in yours, it takes faith in man, I think I will take my chances with God, he does not change Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fovezer Posted February 10, 2004 Group: Advanced Member Followers: 0 Topic Count: 1 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 305 Content Per Day: 0.04 Reputation: 0 Days Won: 0 Joined: 10/27/2003 Status: Offline Author Share Posted February 10, 2004 Stawman? Instantaneous? My point is, there still has to be a first, just because it is benefcial does not mean that beings can "morph" show me any proof that this can happen Semi-evolved creatures, no not cat/dog, well isn't that what you claim archaeopteryx is? Tell me are you familar with the "hopeul monster" theory In my beliefs, it takes faith in God, in yours, it takes faith in man, I think I will take my chances with God, he does not change I will post on how they evolve tomorrow. It is too late. Expect it tomorrow. There are no such things as "semi-evolved" creatures. All creatures are full evolved, they just continue to evolve if it is beneficial, and that is how we get new animals. I claimed that archaeopteryx is a transitional, not a "semi-evolved animal". How is accepting evolution having faith in man? Many christians accept evolution, and they have faith in god. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest LadyC Posted February 10, 2004 Share Posted February 10, 2004 ahhhh, athiest, well that explains it. what do i mean by we continue to evolve? how much explanation do you need? evolution is a continual process as we adapt to changes in environment etc, but earth and its inhabitants didn't evolve from nothing. it was created. funny, i've never found genesis 1 and 2 to be contradictory. i'm not interested in any articles you may post, but perhaps you could show me some scriptures in the two that contradict themselves. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest skidd2 Posted February 10, 2004 Share Posted February 10, 2004 As I see it, belief in an evolving human from ape to man would place God in an ape like existance ( man in God's image). The problem is that as time goes by, more amd more fossils indicate that a line of apes was evolving into human form. Even if you believe those apes never made it into human form, you still have a problem, there are no records of modern humans from the same time period, regardless of how long ago that may have been. And yes, I know that doesn't prove humans weren't there, but it does indicate that a changing, evolving ape was becoming more humanlike. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Russell Posted February 10, 2004 Group: Advanced Member Followers: 0 Topic Count: 28 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 289 Content Per Day: 0.04 Reputation: 3 Days Won: 0 Joined: 01/01/2004 Status: Offline Birthday: 01/01/1957 Share Posted February 10, 2004 Psssst....I'm an atheist. Fovezer, if you are an atheist why are you concerned at all about the Bibical account? Is it because you have some unanswered questions, doubts about your existence? If I could show you that Genesis 1,2 is correct, scientifically that is; in that the world is 6000 years old would you believe in the Bible as the Word of God. Blessings Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts