Peer review papers -

[Guest arkon]

Its long, so wait until you have time. Its well worth the read, and the conclusions are testable by everyone.

Any time you allege a conspiracy is afoot, especially in the field of science, you are treading on thin ice. We tend to be very sceptical about conspiracies

Edited May 31, 2004 by arkon

[Bread_of_Life]

Arkon,

I'm afraid that I will respond to you when you have the decency to write your own posts, of reasonable length, and of content you might actually choose to defend.

I'm sorry, I draw the line at huge cut and pastes.

[Guest arkon]

I warned at the top it was long.

I have no doubt in my mind that the system will hide the truth at all costs because there is just too much to lose at this point.

The purpose of this post was not to get anyone who believes in the current accepted theories to change their belief, but rather...to get people who believe those theories to examine the facts presented ... hopefully from an objective point of view...so they can consider them...and come to their own conclusion.

This is not Red vs Blue

This is , ' Hey...look at this....what do you make of it? Why did they do that?

[Leonard]

Zounds! The pot blackards the kettle!!!

[Bread_of_Life]

Leonard,

Perhaps I'm being a bit stupid here, but, when have I ever done the same? I take it that's what you meant by your pot calling the kettle black comment?

I can only think of two instances where I have cut and pasted a sizeable post (and even then, they wern't half as big as this) - and both times the posts were in fact written by me, I was copying them from another forum.

I have never and would never simply cut and paste huge swathes of stuff from a website, or from someone else, nor would I expect anyone to respond to them if I did. Any long detailed post I write is in my own words, and from my own knowledge.

[Rick]

Good info Arkon! Thanks for sharing!