wingnut-

They truly believe that the majority of people agree with them. They are convinced it is only a small fragment of people that are opposed to their thoughts. They are living in a different reality.

Amen sister.

Just another attempt to chip, chip, chip away at freedom.

I agree, other than to say D is a higher grade than I would give her.

All of the above are in violation of the Constitution and deny our rights. The patriot act is one of the worst things to have ever been forced on the American people, enabling the government to operate with impunity in violation of individual rights. Do you honestly think Kathy Griffin is a greater threat to America than homeland security officers walking around in public with automatic rifles?

It was clearly not a sincere apology, the woman has no shame.

Probably why I am opposed to both parties, they each want to play dictator in their own way.

Edited to add: The post you responded to was a question, not an accusation. And I say that if such a law existed it would be opposed to freedom, so I am against any proposed law that violates those freedoms, whether it was on the books or not.

The SS is part of the treasury department, is there a more perverted governmental agency than that one? Because they established a nation based on personal liberty, and today people choose to trample on others liberties in favor of their own personal preferences. Seems like a great idea when you are in the majority, but not so cool to those in the minority. What everyone seems to be forgetting is that some day you may find yourself in the minority, so tread carefully.

Funny, because typically I hear that accusation against the liberals.

So you are in favor of an overbearing federal government that manipulates the law through personal interpretation to weaken your personal freedom?

Right, because governmental agencies would never do such a thing, which means Trump is currently under investigation for legitimate reasons and not just because liberals are upset they lost the election. They should have everything to do with it considering they understood liberty far more than people in this nation do today. When the smoke from this clears you will see that you are not right at all.

Of course it is, which is why they said in the preamble to the Constitution that they intended to form "a more perfect union" than the one they had lived under previously. Then they established the freedoms for the citizenry to exercise, so unless you believe they thought themselves criminals and not patriots, it surely is the same thing.

The men who wrote the Constitution and the Bill of Rights would not agree with you, they had no issue with burning images of King George in effigy.

I know that because of the emotional reaction being displayed on this thread. I know that because I'm a parent and it would upset me as well. I wouldn't care for a moment about someone depicting my head as being severed, but if my child saw it and was upset that would get a reaction from me. The founders did not agree with you, nor do I.

She's only under investigation because of emotional reactions to what she did. I get it, as a parent, if my 12 year old was hurt by something like this I would react no differently initially. At the end of the day nothing from this investigation will hold up in court as it would violate her rights.

At the end of the day the law will not be able to touch her, and all that will be accomplished is a waste of our tax dollars.

In order for this to be considered a legitimate threat, one would have to believe. a) that she could get anywhere near the President alone (which now would be absolutely impossible) b) that if she did get near the President she could actually overpower him c) that once she overpowered him, she could decapitate him While I certainly don't support her message, it is clear to me she is not a legitimate threat to the President. God bless

You must not have seen her temper tantrum from the same day where she was in hysterics blaming Trump for ruining her life, and also casting accusations toward the first lady and a 12 year old kid. Not only is she not sorry, she is trying to play the victim and blame Trump and "old white men" for all of her troubles. This rant of hers proved that she is not only not sorry, but completely out of touch with reality.

The rewards and the dead being judged are said as a result of the 7th trumpet, the fact that these things occur at the end is proof that Revelation is not chronological. The entire book of Revelation is a revealing of prophecy, there is nothing after. The 7th trumpet is no different than any other occurrence in the book, what takes place as a result of each event is told following each event. I am being consistent, we just don't agree on the timing. God bless

The preamble to the Constitution begins as such... We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union A more perfect union than what? The union they were under previously, a King and his subjects. They wanted to get out from under tyranny, and have fair representation in government. In doing this they established laws regarding rights. In order for your claim to be true, they would have had to thought themselves criminals for burning images of King George in effigy. They did not, they considered themselves patriots, and the more perfect union they established made it legal to do so. What they did not intend was for any branch of the government to decide to take any of these rights away from the citizenry. Not through legislation, and certainly not through the court system which has no business making law in the first place. The Constitution does not need to be interpreted, it only needs to be read and understood by the actions of the very men who established it. The treasury department, which is what the SS falls under, was not created by these men, it did not exist. People have added things to the law as a result. Elected officials are supposed to be public servants, they are supposed to serve the public. Instead what they have become are public leeches, sucking the blood out of the very people they are supposed to be serving. We pay for them to have armed security, while they move to disarm the citizens. They force a bad healthcare system on all of us, which they themselves are exempt from. Could that be because somewhere along the line they have convinced citizens that they are above us? They are supposed to serve us, not the other way around, and this very fact gives us the right to say whatever we want in regards to the service we feel we are getting. Not agreeing with some of the citizenry is not a crime, regardless of how many times you say it is. God bless

Well said.

I wish I lived closer so I could take you myself. Will be praying the Lord makes a way for you, God bless brother.

No worries, I understood what you were saying, as a watchman I follow all the threads so I see the strong disagreements.

No rush my friend, take your time to digest it all, there is a lot of information to consider. God bless