wingnut-

He also filed a civil lawsuit for defamation of character that has not been settled, so what I posted still stands. Also, the public apology only hurts D'Souza in that case, but his genuine remorse for causing the man hardship didn't prevent him from doing the right thing and admitting error.

The guy is clearly delusional. I don't think he realizes how much damage he personally caused to his party.

I know, you're innocent. This isn't yet another personal attack to compensate for the weak argument presented or the lack of evidence to support it. No, I didn't mean to say that or I would have, so let's just unpack all that inaccuracies of your claims. D'Souza wrote, "We were assured that the surveillance videos had been linked to geolocation cell phone data, such that each video depicted an individual who had made at least 10 visits to drop boxes. Indeed, it is clear from the interviews within the film itself that True the Vote was correlating the videos to geolocation data." Note that this references more than one. "While the video in the film created an incorrect inference as to Mr. Andrews" And this references a singular video. Oops! “We recently learned that surveillance videos used in the film may not have actually been correlated with the geolocation data.” Uh-oh, plural again. I wonder why? “I know that the film and my book create the impression that these individuals were mules that had been identified as suspected ballot harvesters based on their geotracked cell phone data,” Oh boy, again, he doesn't say this individual, as in Mr. Roberts, once again it is plural. There is a reason for that. D'Souza is facing numerous lawsuits is the answer, and for the record, he has not settled with Mr. Roberts, Salem Media Group did, after they rightfully pulled the plug on the movie and the book. Your argument is still lacking evidence of around 9.8 million votes.

Only because I won't take the bait! Ah yes, your source of information, the infamous 2000 mules. How ironic considering recent events in which Dinesh D'Souza has issued an apology for 'misleading' and 'inaccurate information' that is contained in the book and the film. D’Souza wrote: “During the production of this film, as a supplement to the geolocation data, True the Vote provided my team with ballot drop box surveillance footage that had been obtained through open records requests. We were assured that the surveillance videos had been linked to geolocation cell phone data, such that each video depicted an individual who had made at least 10 visits to drop boxes. Indeed, it is clear from the interviews within the film itself that True the Vote was correlating the videos to geolocation data. " “We recently learned that surveillance videos used in the film may not have actually been correlated with the geolocation data.” “I know that the film and my book create the impression that these individuals were mules that had been identified as suspected ballot harvesters based on their geotracked cell phone data,” Basically, 2000 mules has been completely debunked as it is riddled with inaccurate information. Salem Media Group has pulled the movie from all its platforms, and has extended that to the book which is no longer in publication. You were bamboozled by the far right extremists who masquerade as conservatives, just as Dinesh D'Souza was, and unfortunately for him, he is going to end up paying for it. Rather than adhering to a false narrative that reflects what you want to be true, perhaps you will come to grips with the same reality that D'Souza has, and that individuals like myself tried to warn against.

Why do I suddenly feel like I'm watching another Kamala Harris commercial? She decided to spend most of her campaign telling voters what Donald Trump thought or would do, similar to this attempt of yours to be an expert on me. Unless things have changed on this site, attempting to make me the topic isn't acceptable, and this is why I chose not to address specifics with you. I guess in your mind this gives you free reign to make false assertions and claims about someone. You know absolutely nothing about me, nor will you ever be given the opportunity, and I'll leave it at that.

I reserve my imagination for creative writing, when it comes to real life I'll just stick to reality.

Par for the course, happens for every presidential appointment.

They exercised their right not to vote, as one third of the population does nearly every single presidential election cycle. In 2020, ten million from that one third of the population did decide to vote, most likely because of the ease in which it was made to do so on account of the Covid lockdown. I addressed this in my original post.

If that's what you see then so be it, I'm not an optometrist. I'm not interested in all the back and forth since you still cannot address the elephant in the room, ten million votes. Show me the evidence that reveals ten million instances of cheating, because so far everything you pointed to supports the findings those of us who worked on this uncovered, numbers in the thousands.

I think your own bias blinded you from the words you were reading then. There are several excerpts from my original post, what do you see there? Here in Michigan it was proportionate to the increased number of overall votes, so basically at the same percentage with a slightly higher number. I was one of the many volunteers that participated in the investigation that was done here in Michigan. So I saw all of it. I'm also familiar with the evidence from other recounts that took place across the nation, and the same pattern held true across the board. The numbers were not enough to change the results anywhere, and it came out to numbers in the thousands, not in the ballpark of ten million. I hate to burst another bubble of false assumptions, but I was calling out the main stream media a decade and a half before Donald Trump decided to enter politics. I'm a journalism major, and I used to debate this with liberal flunkies on this very site after pointing out that true objective journalism hadn't been practiced in this country since the media figures of the 70's stepped aside. I haven't watched the main stream media channels or read their papers since the beginning of the 21st century, except of course on two occasions that I couldn't resist. Those were following the election results in 2016 and the recent one, just because I cannot express how much pleasure I get from seeing the looks on their faces as their world comes unraveled by reality.

Exactly my point, cheating always happens. What had never happened before was a "pandemic" in which the population was confined by the government and mass mail balloting took place. You failed to address that, instead appearing confused as to whether I am trying to make a statement opposite of what you clearly recognize I said, cheating has been happening longer than we've been alive. I actually did look at the evidence, and it doesn't add up to ten million votes. So, again, I didn't doubt it since I know it happens, and if I have any bias, it is on the side of the fact that cheating always happens and the democrats are the main source of it since it always revolves around the major cities they control.

It shouldn't surprise you considering that Iran was just exposed for actually orchestrating assassination attempts against Trump. There are forces outside of our country with far more to lose with Trump in the White House than there are within our own country.

The 2020 election was destined to appear as an anomaly because of the unique set of circumstances surrounding it, specifically Covid. The mass implementation of the voting by mail with the early ballots made it ripe for manipulation. While many of the votes were undoubtedly not cast by actual people, this has always been the case, and there are a lot of people who also took advantage of voting from home that otherwise don't usually vote. In my home state of Michigan, it has been well known and proven that from within Detroit there has been cheating going back to the sixties, with not only votes from the dead, but also from cartoon characters. In 2020 the number of voters from Detroit far exceeded the number of people living there according to the census that was done prior to that election cycle, and those numbers were slightly higher than the normal level of corruption. The truth is, aside from votes cast by dead people and cartoon characters, it is impossible for either side to prove that the election was stolen because one third of the population either will not vote at all, or they are part of the inconsistent voter group that may or may not choose to vote in any election cycle.

It will be interesting to see where this investigation leads, but don't dismiss the possibility that this event was orchestrated by outside forces as opposed to domestic ones.

I agree, there was nothing controversial about removing him to anyone outside the establishment, but that's the real problem Trump still faces. The old guard still exists within the Republican party, so don't be surprised when they start submarining some of the changes that are so desperately needed in DC. Personally I'm glad that Gaetz has been removed from the equation, and it has nothing to do with McCarthy, it is because he is a morally questionable individual who has zero qualifications for that position. Having read the Art of the Deal, I suspect he was a red herring all along to pave the way for the other nominations, and Pam Bondi is an excellent choice.