Jump to content
IGNORED

'Buy American' -- or Bye-Bye America (op-ed)


O'Dannyboy

Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  156
  • Topics Per Day:  0.02
  • Content Count:  3,454
  • Content Per Day:  0.47
  • Reputation:   4
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  09/22/2004
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  07/02/1969

'Buy American' -- or Bye-Bye America by Patrick J. Buchanan

I have to say I don't disagree. We are all aware of the impact of job outsourcing and dependence on foreign resources as a result of the "global" mindset. Don't get me wrong. Trade is a good thing when it enhances both respective economies but when one prospers more than the other the relationship is doomed to fail.

I have been saying this all along. We need to be IN-dependent if we are to prosper as our nation once did. We were the envy of the world but along came the socialists/globalists. Products and goods were purchased on the cheap causing our own producers and manufacturers to fail as a result. And so begins the age of dependence. Long ago nations traded goods that were not available anywhere else but today goods are imported because the cost difference can make men wealthy. Worse is that our government has facilitated such dependence through laws, taxes and regulations that favored the foreign markets.

We need to reclaim our independence before it's too late. Let those who have benefited the most become independent as well as we return to making the things we need and importing only luxury items that we cannot make for ourselves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Members
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  1
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  47
  • Content Per Day:  0.01
  • Reputation:   0
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  07/30/2007
  • Status:  Offline

WOW! That was a great article....

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  24
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  3,292
  • Content Per Day:  0.51
  • Reputation:   11
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  01/21/2007
  • Status:  Offline

I disagree with Pats assertions. The reason there is a trade deficit is because of technological advances. Everybody wants to "buy American" but nobody wants to take the minimum wage jobs that produce the goods we are buying from places like China. The reason we buy so much stuff from China is because America has far surpassed making cheap toys and food. America is a technological leader...not a plastic toy leader.

A trade deficit is not necessarily bad...and it is certainly no cause to become a protectionist like Pat Buchanan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  156
  • Topics Per Day:  0.02
  • Content Count:  3,454
  • Content Per Day:  0.47
  • Reputation:   4
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  09/22/2004
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  07/02/1969

http://www.census.gov/indicator/www/ustrade.html

The trade deficit is not imaginary and we trade with nations other than China. The trade deficit is not a number that represents specific debt but a deficiency in the amount of goods/products we sell versus those we buy. We in the U.S. buy 40 billion dollars worth of goods more than we sell to those same free trade partners. How many jobs and related expenses do you think 40 billion dollars a year would cover? That 40 billion represents the wages for jobs lost to foreign markets. This is not protectionist. If there were no deficit we could still be trading freely with these other economies and nations only we wouldn't be on the loosing end. The gap must be closed. It's not protectionism to want trade numbers to be balanced.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  24
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  3,292
  • Content Per Day:  0.51
  • Reputation:   11
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  01/21/2007
  • Status:  Offline

:laugh:

It is a very good day when Axe and I can agree on a subject.

See...I'm not all bad... :laugh:

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  24
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  3,292
  • Content Per Day:  0.51
  • Reputation:   11
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  01/21/2007
  • Status:  Offline

http://www.census.gov/indicator/www/ustrade.html

The trade deficit is not imaginary and we trade with nations other than China. The trade deficit is not a number that represents specific debt but a deficiency in the amount of goods/products we sell versus those we buy. We in the U.S. buy 40 billion dollars worth of goods more than we sell to those same free trade partners. How many jobs and related expenses do you think 40 billion dollars a year would cover? That 40 billion represents the wages for jobs lost to foreign markets. This is not protectionist. If there were no deficit we could still be trading freely with these other economies and nations only we wouldn't be on the loosing end. The gap must be closed. It's not protectionism to want trade numbers to be balanced.

We had a trade surplus when this country slipped into the Great Depression. Again, a deficit is not necessarily a bad thing when dealing with trade. I have a trade deficit with my local grocery store too..lol. My point is that we are trading in much higher quality goods than China can hope to compete with...do we really want to go back down to China's level so that we can compete with them and make a balance? I say no. We used to be the world leader in manufactured goods and one of the leaders in food production. We progressed technologically and we allowed China to take over those low wage, low economic productions while we advanced.

Having a $40 billion dollar deficit to buy low level manufactured goods from somebody isn't that bad. It allows the majority of our country to advance in productivity in more advanced areas. Fact is, the US has a trade surplus with 115 countries who are trading in things far more important than food and knick-knacks. I see no reason to go backwards and start manufacturing things we can buy just so that we show a surplus.

Ask yourself this...why is it that when the US economy shrinks, the trade deficit narrows. Last month (January) the trade deficit fell by 27%...sure that looks good on paper, but the reality is that it underscores the weakness of the economy...and especially the US dollar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  156
  • Topics Per Day:  0.02
  • Content Count:  3,454
  • Content Per Day:  0.47
  • Reputation:   4
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  09/22/2004
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  07/02/1969

Fact is, the US has a trade surplus with 115 countries who are trading in things far more important than food and knick-knacks. I see no reason to go backwards and start manufacturing things we can buy just so that we show a surplus.

I'm having trouble wrapping my mind around the concept of things that are "far more important" than food. I also have an issue with the whole "why produce that which we can just buy" philosophy. My question is. Buy with what? Borrowed money? Think of the deficit as a cash flow indicator. 40 billion dollars a year has been flowing to other nations that does not get spent on U.S. products, high tech or not. This is the reason our nation is in this crisis. Why fix this or do that when we can pay someone else to do it. Along come the illegals and even more U.S. jobs are scooped up by those willing to WORK for a living. Sadly it seems Americans in general feel as you do. We are too important to make our own toys so we should buy them from some less important country. I am too busy to mow my lawn or clean my pool so I'll just pay the illegal immigrant to do it. And as we have noticed, a large percentage of people in this country are in debt. Perhaps not debilitating debt, but debt non the less. Multiply that debt times the number of Americans in it then pile on the Government spending and charitable giving to other nations around the world.

Our nation, like it's people, have become accustomed to living with a degree of debt never fully intending to be free from it. It's the debt that leads us to dependence. The very same dependence that causes people to endure jobs they are unhappy with just as our leaders accept trade conditions that are not completely fair but the more we borrow the more we owe as the interest compounds.

(article) Americans are 'financially illiterate'

Lets use the sub prime loan crisis as an example. This crisis is not totally the fault of the mortgage industry. Someone had to sign the dotted line. The same someones who wanted their dream home without FIRST having worked and saved the money to buy it.

(article) Americans living beyond their means

When I spend more than I make I go into debt. The same principle also applies to our nation. When we spend more than we earn we go in debt. Similarly when we produce less than we consume we go into debt. Action - reaction. We can't gloss it over with (we produce high tech stuff so we can't be bothered with growing our own food). This does not change the fact that we consume (buy) more than we make so the deficit then leads to debt then leads to dependence. Pretty simple. Our budget is not balanced. Many politicians give lip service to "balancing the budget" but as we can see that has not been a priority. With ever dollar we and our leaders spend that is not backed by a product, resource or service we sacrifice our freedom and that of our children.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  24
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  3,292
  • Content Per Day:  0.51
  • Reputation:   11
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  01/21/2007
  • Status:  Offline

I'm having trouble wrapping my mind around the concept of things that are "far more important" than food. I also have an issue with the whole "why produce that which we can just buy" philosophy. My question is. Buy with what? Borrowed money? Think of the deficit as a cash flow indicator. 40 billion dollars a year has been flowing to other nations that does not get spent on U.S. products, high tech or not. This is the reason our nation is in this crisis. Why fix this or do that when we can pay someone else to do it. Along come the illegals and even more U.S. jobs are scooped up by those willing to WORK for a living. Sadly it seems Americans in general feel as you do. We are too important to make our own toys so we should buy them from some less important country. I am too busy to mow my lawn or clean my pool so I'll just pay the illegal immigrant to do it. And as we have noticed, a large percentage of people in this country are in debt. Perhaps not debilitating debt, but debt non the less. Multiply that debt times the number of Americans in it then pile on the Government spending and charitable giving to other nations around the world.

Our nation, like it's people, have become accustomed to living with a degree of debt never fully intending to be free from it. It's the debt that leads us to dependence. The very same dependence that causes people to endure jobs they are unhappy with just as our leaders accept trade conditions that are not completely fair but the more we borrow the more we owe as the interest compounds.

(article) Americans are 'financially illiterate'

Lets use the sub prime loan crisis as an example. This crisis is not totally the fault of the mortgage industry. Someone had to sign the dotted line. The same someones who wanted their dream home without FIRST having worked and saved the money to buy it.

(article) Americans living beyond their means

When I spend more than I make I go into debt. The same principle also applies to our nation. When we spend more than we earn we go in debt. Similarly when we produce less than we consume we go into debt. Action - reaction. We can't gloss it over with (we produce high tech stuff so we can't be bothered with growing our own food). This does not change the fact that we consume (buy) more than we make so the deficit then leads to debt then leads to dependence. Pretty simple. Our budget is not balanced. Many politicians give lip service to "balancing the budget" but as we can see that has not been a priority. With ever dollar we and our leaders spend that is not backed by a product, resource or service we sacrifice our freedom and that of our children.

Hey Brother...you just switched topics. Your comments about a "balanced budget" are spot on, for the most part. I would disagree with a few minor details, but I don't wish to discuss a "balanced budget" at this time.

You initiated this topic by discussing the trade deficit. The $40 billion dollar trade deficit is a drop in the bucket in the US budget. It would cost this country way more than $40 billion dollars to start producing all the food and toys and goods we buy from Mexico and China (and others) ...especially once you got the unions involved telling us we had to pay people $15/hr to do it.

You are basically making the argument that Walmart (i.e. countries we are in deficit with) is making too much money off of us...so we should start growing our own food and making our own toys...and you justify it by saying you can't really fit Walmart into your budget because you have too much debt. I'm saying, Walmart is providing a service that we must fit into the budget because it would cost too much to produce those goods on our own...whatever debts I've amassed have nothing to do with my need to buy supplies. If I need to cut back it won't be on my food and goods (i.e. Walmart.) Our debt as a Nation has almost NOTHING to do with the trade deficit. Look at the spending bill that Obama is getting ready to pass...$40 billion dollars doesn't even warrant a *sigh* compared to that.

Also I completely disagree with the notion that our "crisis" is a result of the trade deficit. The US budget for 2008 was $2,700B, I think we can spare the $40B in trade deficits for low production manufacturing and foods. I'll bet we could both come up with about 100 other various things that we could cut out of the US budget besides the trade deficit, that are more expensive and unneeded. The food, clothes, and whatever other things we buy from foreign countries are things we can afford.

This issue goes so much deeper than "who buys more from whom"...as I'm certain you would agree. I am curious about your throwing in the "illegals stealing American jobs" angle though. Are you saying you'd be willing to pay twice as much for goods and services? I would say that if buying foreign products bothers somebody that much...then don't buy those products. Nobody is forcing people to buy Chinese products...however, at the same time people like Pat Buchanan shouldn't be trying to drag this country's productivity back into the 1930's either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  156
  • Topics Per Day:  0.02
  • Content Count:  3,454
  • Content Per Day:  0.47
  • Reputation:   4
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  09/22/2004
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  07/02/1969

I think you miss the point all together. We, as a nation, have more going out than is coming in. Therein lies our problem. Regardless what we are spending the money on we are spending more than we make. As I heard it this morning our GDP is shrinking and we are now borrowing money at an alarming rate. How can we possibly hope to escape this debt? Interestingly the country to whom we have the largest trade deficit is also the one from whom our government has been borrowing money. I also heard this morning that our national parks are being surveyed and counted as collateral against these loans our leaders are taking. It seems this could be why Bush was trying to sell our ports. To pay off debts. Unless we as a nation begin making more than we spend we will never be out of debt. It's that simple.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • You are coming up higher in this season – above the assignments of character assassination and verbal arrows sent to manage you, contain you, and derail your purpose. Where you have had your dreams and sleep robbed, as well as your peace and clarity robbed – leaving you feeling foggy, confused, and heavy – God is, right now, bringing freedom back -- now you will clearly see the smoke and mirrors that were set to distract you and you will disengage.

      Right now God is declaring a "no access zone" around you, and your enemies will no longer have any entry point into your life. Oil is being poured over you to restore the years that the locust ate and give you back your passion. This is where you will feel a fresh roar begin to erupt from your inner being, and a call to leave the trenches behind and begin your odyssey in your Christ calling moving you to bear fruit that remains as you minister to and disciple others into their Christ identity.

      This is where you leave the trenches and scale the mountain to fight from a different place, from victory, from peace, and from rest. Now watch as God leads you up higher above all the noise, above all the chaos, and shows you where you have been seated all along with Him in heavenly places where you are UNTOUCHABLE. This is where you leave the soul fight, and the mind battle, and learn to fight differently.

      You will know how to live like an eagle and lead others to the same place of safety and protection that God led you to, which broke you out of the silent prison you were in. Put your war boots on and get ready to fight back! Refuse to lay down -- get out of bed and rebuke what is coming at you. Remember where you are seated and live from that place.

      Acts 1:8 - “But you will receive power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you, and you will be my witnesses … to the end of the earth.”

       

      ALBERT FINCH MINISTRY
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 1 reply
    • George Whitten, the visionary behind Worthy Ministries and Worthy News, explores the timing of the Simchat Torah War in Israel. Is this a water-breaking moment? Does the timing of the conflict on October 7 with Hamas signify something more significant on the horizon?

       



      This was a message delivered at Eitz Chaim Congregation in Dallas Texas on February 3, 2024.

      To sign up for our Worthy Brief -- https://worthybrief.com

      Be sure to keep up to date with world events from a Christian perspective by visiting Worthy News -- https://www.worthynews.com

      Visit our live blogging channel on Telegram -- https://t.me/worthywatch
      • 0 replies
    • Understanding the Enemy!

      I thought I write about the flip side of a topic, and how to recognize the attempts of the enemy to destroy lives and how you can walk in His victory!

      For the Apostle Paul taught us not to be ignorant of enemy's tactics and strategies.

      2 Corinthians 2:112  Lest Satan should get an advantage of us: for we are not ignorant of his devices. 

      So often, we can learn lessons by learning and playing "devil's" advocate.  When we read this passage,

      Mar 3:26  And if Satan rise up against himself, and be divided, he cannot stand, but hath an end. 
      Mar 3:27  No man can enter into a strong man's house, and spoil his goods, except he will first bind the strongman; and then he will spoil his house. 

      Here we learn a lesson that in order to plunder one's house you must first BIND up the strongman.  While we realize in this particular passage this is referring to God binding up the strongman (Satan) and this is how Satan's house is plundered.  But if you carefully analyze the enemy -- you realize that he uses the same tactics on us!  Your house cannot be plundered -- unless you are first bound.   And then Satan can plunder your house!

      ... read more
        • Praise God!
      • 231 replies
    • Daniel: Pictures of the Resurrection, Part 3

      Shalom everyone,

      As we continue this study, I'll be focusing on Daniel and his picture of the resurrection and its connection with Yeshua (Jesus). 

      ... read more
      • 13 replies
    • Abraham and Issac: Pictures of the Resurrection, Part 2
      Shalom everyone,

      As we continue this series the next obvious sign of the resurrection in the Old Testament is the sign of Isaac and Abraham.

      Gen 22:1  After these things God tested Abraham and said to him, "Abraham!" And he said, "Here I am."
      Gen 22:2  He said, "Take your son, your only son Isaac, whom you love, and go to the land of Moriah, and offer him there as a burnt offering on one of the mountains of which I shall tell you."

      So God "tests" Abraham and as a perfect picture of the coming sacrifice of God's only begotten Son (Yeshua - Jesus) God instructs Issac to go and sacrifice his son, Issac.  Where does he say to offer him?  On Moriah -- the exact location of the Temple Mount.

      ...read more
      • 20 replies
×
×
  • Create New...