wyguy Posted April 26, 2010 Group: Royal Member Followers: 1 Topic Count: 373 Topics Per Day: 0.07 Content Count: 3,331 Content Per Day: 0.59 Reputation: 71 Days Won: 10 Joined: 10/15/2008 Status: Offline Birthday: 12/24/1965 Share Posted April 26, 2010 Noah's Ark was discovered back in the 40s. 1948 I believe it was. Is this the same one? I don't know. If it's not, there's alot of boats on that mountain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeonaWithHumility Posted April 26, 2010 Group: Junior Member Followers: 1 Topic Count: 5 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 111 Content Per Day: 0.02 Reputation: 0 Days Won: 0 Joined: 01/16/2010 Status: Offline Birthday: 12/07/1951 Share Posted April 26, 2010 Noah's Ark was discovered back in the 40s. 1948 I believe it was. Is this the same one? I don't know. If it's not, there's alot of boats on that mountain. One of the "boats" found there turned out to be a rock formation which did uncannily resemble the Ark. If this latest one isn't it, I really hope someone finds it. It would be a very great discovery. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blien Posted April 26, 2010 Group: Royal Member Followers: 1 Topic Count: 346 Topics Per Day: 0.06 Content Count: 3,050 Content Per Day: 0.50 Reputation: 46 Days Won: 3 Joined: 10/02/2007 Status: Offline Birthday: 08/26/1982 Author Share Posted April 26, 2010 Noah's Ark was discovered back in the 40s. 1948 I believe it was. Is this the same one? I don't know. If it's not, there's alot of boats on that mountain. One of the "boats" found there turned out to be a rock formation which did uncannily resemble the Ark. If this latest one isn't it, I really hope someone finds it. It would be a very great discovery. well it certainly isn't a rock formation.. if you watch the video it shows grains and hay in the structure.. the seeds, if I didn't know any better looked in a way kind of like buckwheat or quinoa but I'm no farmer.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CSLewis Posted April 26, 2010 Group: Diamond Member Followers: 1 Topic Count: 34 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 828 Content Per Day: 0.13 Reputation: 20 Days Won: 0 Joined: 05/28/2006 Status: Offline Birthday: 12/28/1980 Share Posted April 26, 2010 Another ark finding hahaha - Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MorningGlory Posted April 26, 2010 Group: Royal Member Followers: 0 Topic Count: 1,022 Topics Per Day: 0.16 Content Count: 39,193 Content Per Day: 6.09 Reputation: 9,977 Days Won: 78 Joined: 10/01/2006 Status: Offline Share Posted April 26, 2010 From what they show, it IS a wooden structure. If it's a boat what else could it be but the Ark? I'm so excited about this. Thanks for posting it, Blien! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest D1684 Posted April 27, 2010 Share Posted April 27, 2010 There were some Monks who built a replica of Noah's Ark centuries ago. It could be that's what they've found. I think Noah's ark would have to be at least 50,000 years old, since every culture on earth seems to have a memory of it. Even the aborigines of Australia have a memory/legend similar to Noah's ark. I think by now there wouldn't be anything left of it, because it would have disintegrated long ago. DNA evidence shows everyone on earth today is descended from one woman and (probably) one man. Scientists call the woman "Eve" appropriately enough. The say she lived 250,000 years ago. What I wonder is, if this "Eve" is the Biblical Eve or Noah's wife, since even if the Deluge was a localised event as some say (it seems the most plausible idea), it still must have affected all living people, since all cultures have a trace memory of Noah's Ark. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MorningGlory Posted April 27, 2010 Group: Royal Member Followers: 0 Topic Count: 1,022 Topics Per Day: 0.16 Content Count: 39,193 Content Per Day: 6.09 Reputation: 9,977 Days Won: 78 Joined: 10/01/2006 Status: Offline Share Posted April 27, 2010 Another ark finding hahaha - Why do you scoff, CS? This is a really exciting possibility. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~Shalhevet~ Posted April 27, 2010 Group: Royal Member Followers: 1 Topic Count: 334 Topics Per Day: 0.06 Content Count: 2,049 Content Per Day: 0.38 Reputation: 120 Days Won: 4 Joined: 08/13/2009 Status: Offline Share Posted April 27, 2010 incredible! I'm definitely sharing this! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rick-Parker Posted April 27, 2010 Group: Royal Member Followers: 8 Topic Count: 200 Topics Per Day: 0.23 Content Count: 4,273 Content Per Day: 4.84 Reputation: 1,855 Days Won: 0 Joined: 12/17/2021 Status: Offline Birthday: 06/03/1955 Share Posted April 27, 2010 Another ark finding hahaha - Why do you scoff, CS? This is a really exciting possibility. CINO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sheya joie Posted April 27, 2010 Group: Diamond Member Followers: 7 Topic Count: 13 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 2,054 Content Per Day: 0.29 Reputation: 351 Days Won: 2 Joined: 03/15/2005 Status: Offline Share Posted April 27, 2010 There were some Monks who built a replica of Noah's Ark centuries ago. It could be that's what they've found. I think Noah's ark would have to be at least 50,000 years old, since every culture on earth seems to have a memory of it. Even the aborigines of Australia have a memory/legend similar to Noah's ark. I think by now there wouldn't be anything left of it, because it would have disintegrated long ago. DNA evidence shows everyone on earth today is descended from one woman and (probably) one man. Scientists call the woman "Eve" appropriately enough. The say she lived 250,000 years ago. What I wonder is, if this "Eve" is the Biblical Eve or Noah's wife, since even if the Deluge was a localised event as some say (it seems the most plausible idea), it still must have affected all living people, since all cultures have a trace memory of Noah's Ark. If the Flood was localized only (as opposed to worldwide), there would have been no need to gather animals to keep the various kinds alive, nor even a need to build an ark for refuge from the Flood - they could have simply walked out of the area that was going to be flooded and go to high ground elsewhere. The fact that they had to build the ark and gather the animals shows that there wasn't going to be any high ground left anywhere. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts