Tinky Posted January 1, 2013 Group: Diamond Member Followers: 1 Topic Count: 200 Topics Per Day: 0.04 Content Count: 1,602 Content Per Day: 0.30 Reputation: 291 Days Won: 8 Joined: 10/24/2009 Status: Offline Birthday: 01/01/1986 Share Posted January 1, 2013 Dianne Feinstein: “If I could have gotten 51 votes in the Senate of the United States, for an outright ban, picking up [every gun]… Mr. and Mrs. America, turn ‘em all in.” Senator Dianne Feinstein’s ultimate plan has always been to have Mr. and Mrs. America turn in their guns to the government, period. Feinstein has admitted that the bill is about gun confiscation. She tells us a gun ban is about saving the children and reducing crime, but her comments on 60 Minutes in 1995 reveal her true plan is to disarm the American people. Link for video: http://www.infowars....n-in-your-guns/ On Thursday, Feinstein will introduced her dream bill to disarm the American people. The legislation is open-ended and includes provisions to re-register firearms and submit the fingerprints of law-abiding Americans as if they’re sex offenders. Feinstein’s bill will also include a buy-back provision that will allow the government to confiscate all firearms. Both Feinstein and New York governor Andrew Cuomo have said that is their plan. It is a gun confiscation bill. The proposed bill is open declaration of war on the Second Amendment. It’s no coincidence that the communist Chinese, the biggest holders of U.S. debt, have demanded the American people be disarmed. It is the simple action of the authoritarian. For more on Feinstein’s gun-grabbing legislation, see these articles: Feinstein Vows to Introduce Assault Weapons Ban Bill Obama to Put “Full Weight” Behind Feinstein Gun Confiscation Plan Feinstein and Fellow Gun-Grabbers Are Going For Broke Feinstein & Cuomo Admit Planning Australian Style Government Gun Buy Back http://www.infowars.com/video-dianne-feinstein-says-prepare-to-turn-in-your-guns/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RustyAngeL Posted January 1, 2013 Group: Worthy Ministers Followers: 23 Topic Count: 155 Topics Per Day: 0.02 Content Count: 7,464 Content Per Day: 1.02 Reputation: 8,810 Days Won: 57 Joined: 03/30/2004 Status: Offline Birthday: 12/12/1952 Share Posted January 1, 2013 That sounds just the liberal agenda. Ms Feinstein is my senator, I live in California. I didn't vote for her and these liberals don't seem to understand that if guns are taken away from people like me and others who obtain legally the only ones that will have them are the kooks like the one who just shot and killed 27 people. The black market is still open to anyone who has the pull and money. They want to rewrite the Bill of Rights and the Constitution they won't be happy until they do. Wake up America, Wake up God's people it's time we took America back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustinM Posted January 2, 2013 Group: Royal Member Followers: 4 Topic Count: 144 Topics Per Day: 0.02 Content Count: 4,512 Content Per Day: 0.68 Reputation: 625 Days Won: 10 Joined: 04/11/2006 Status: Offline Birthday: 10/07/1979 Share Posted January 2, 2013 She should start with herself if she's really serious about it. She's got a concealed carry permit. She should be the first to announce that she and her personal security no longer carry firearms, let's see how safe she feels then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Patriot21 Posted January 2, 2013 Group: Worthy Ministers Followers: 28 Topic Count: 338 Topics Per Day: 0.05 Content Count: 15,711 Content Per Day: 2.45 Reputation: 8,528 Days Won: 39 Joined: 10/25/2006 Status: Offline Birthday: 02/27/1985 Share Posted January 2, 2013 when our government-including the Obama family, turns in their guns, maybe Ill take them seriously. Maybe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoldenEagle Posted January 3, 2013 Group: Royal Member Followers: 4 Topic Count: 764 Topics Per Day: 0.18 Content Count: 7,626 Content Per Day: 1.80 Reputation: 1,559 Days Won: 44 Joined: 10/03/2012 Status: Offline Share Posted January 3, 2013 Isn't this similar to what happened in Germany during the time of Hitler's regime? Registration: The Nazi Paradigm By Stephen P. Halbrook, Ph.D., J.D. New research into Adolf Hitler's use of firearms registration lists to confiscate guns and the execution of their owners teaches a forceful lesson -- one that reveals why the American people and Congress have rejected registering honest firearm owners. It would be instructive at this time to recall why the American citizenry and Congress have historically opposed the registration of firearms. The reason is plain. Registration makes it easy for a tyrannical government to confiscate firearms and to make prey of its subjects. Denying this historical fact is no more justified than denying that the Holocaust occurred or that the Nazis murdered millions of unarmed people. I am writing a book on Nazi policies and practices which sought to repress civilian gun ownership and to eradicate gun owners in Germany and in occupied Europe. The following sampling of my findings should give pause to the suggestion that draconian punishment of citizens for keeping firearms necessarily is a social good. Full article: http://www.stephenha...gistration.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matthitjah Posted January 3, 2013 Group: Royal Member Followers: 4 Topic Count: 1,285 Topics Per Day: 0.16 Content Count: 17,917 Content Per Day: 2.27 Reputation: 355 Days Won: 19 Joined: 10/01/2002 Status: Offline Share Posted January 3, 2013 Isn't this similar to what happened in Germany during the time of Hitler's regime? Registration: The Nazi Paradigm By Stephen P. Halbrook, Ph.D., J.D. New research into Adolf Hitler's use of firearms registration lists to confiscate guns and the execution of their owners teaches a forceful lesson -- one that reveals why the American people and Congress have rejected registering honest firearm owners. It would be instructive at this time to recall why the American citizenry and Congress have historically opposed the registration of firearms. The reason is plain. Registration makes it easy for a tyrannical government to confiscate firearms and to make prey of its subjects. Denying this historical fact is no more justified than denying that the Holocaust occurred or that the Nazis murdered millions of unarmed people. I am writing a book on Nazi policies and practices which sought to repress civilian gun ownership and to eradicate gun owners in Germany and in occupied Europe. The following sampling of my findings should give pause to the suggestion that draconian punishment of citizens for keeping firearms necessarily is a social good. Full article: http://www.stephenha...gistration.html Yes, but too many folks are still asleep either willingly or due to ignorance to stand up and take notice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustinM Posted January 3, 2013 Group: Royal Member Followers: 4 Topic Count: 144 Topics Per Day: 0.02 Content Count: 4,512 Content Per Day: 0.68 Reputation: 625 Days Won: 10 Joined: 04/11/2006 Status: Offline Birthday: 10/07/1979 Share Posted January 3, 2013 The people that agree with disarmament will be lined up against the wall and shot with the rest of us. Once there are no guns left, you either do what the government says, or you lose everything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
He giveth more grace Posted January 3, 2013 Group: Royal Member Followers: 2 Topic Count: 123 Topics Per Day: 0.02 Content Count: 2,049 Content Per Day: 0.32 Reputation: 267 Days Won: 9 Joined: 10/22/2006 Status: Offline Share Posted January 3, 2013 Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not. Thomas Jefferson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MorningGlory Posted January 3, 2013 Group: Royal Member Followers: 0 Topic Count: 1,022 Topics Per Day: 0.16 Content Count: 39,193 Content Per Day: 6.10 Reputation: 9,977 Days Won: 78 Joined: 10/01/2006 Status: Offline Share Posted January 3, 2013 She should start with herself if she's really serious about it. She's got a concealed carry permit. She should be the first to announce that she and her personal security no longer carry firearms, let's see how safe she feels then. I like that way of thinking....she shouldn't need armed protection if she's right about this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burning_Ember Posted January 4, 2013 Group: Diamond Member Followers: 0 Topic Count: 21 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 2,009 Content Per Day: 0.30 Reputation: 100 Days Won: 3 Joined: 09/20/2005 Status: Offline Share Posted January 4, 2013 That sounds just the liberal agenda. Ms Feinstein is my senator, I live in California. I didn't vote for her and these liberals don't seem to understand that if guns are taken away from people like me and others who obtain legally the only ones that will have them are the kooks like the one who just shot and killed 27 people. The black market is still open to anyone who has the pull and money. They want to rewrite the Bill of Rights and the Constitution they won't be happy until they do. Wake up America, Wake up God's people it's time we took America back. In over three quarters of the guns in mass shootings since 1982 were obtained legally. If certain people were not allowed to purchase firearms, y'know, people with criminal records, or heavily mentally ill people (which would require a working mental health system) then that by itself would save a lot of lives. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts