GoldenEagle Posted April 1, 2013 Group: Royal Member Followers: 4 Topic Count: 764 Topics Per Day: 0.18 Content Count: 7,626 Content Per Day: 1.81 Reputation: 1,559 Days Won: 44 Joined: 10/03/2012 Status: Offline Share Posted April 1, 2013 Blaming guns for murders is like blaming pencils for misspelled words. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
back2thebible Posted April 2, 2013 Group: Removed from Forums for Breaking Terms of Service Followers: 1 Topic Count: 16 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 538 Content Per Day: 0.13 Reputation: 61 Days Won: 2 Joined: 03/14/2013 Status: Offline Share Posted April 2, 2013 Blaming guns for murders is like blaming pencils for misspelled words. lol I'm writing that one down Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fez Posted April 2, 2013 Group: Royal Member Followers: 3 Topic Count: 683 Topics Per Day: 0.12 Content Count: 11,128 Content Per Day: 2.00 Reputation: 1,352 Days Won: 54 Joined: 02/03/2009 Status: Offline Birthday: 12/07/1952 Share Posted April 2, 2013 To all: actually in the weapons we now see the military have, even the full autos would have a small effect I agree, and that is partially why I asked in post # 29, where conservatives would draw the line in having weapons in the hands of citizens? Should I be allowed to have gatling/mini guns, install missiles on planes and helicopters we own, have grenades and land mines stocked up? Or chemical weapons and even nuclear? I guess that would depend on the definition of "arms", but not being American, surely stuff like nukes, gas and landmines and what you can mount arms on is covered?. Like if you wanted as a private person to mount a bank of semi auto rifles to the bottom of your helicopter an fire them from in the cockpit remotely. Surely that would be covered somewhere? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts