Jump to content
IGNORED

Supreme Court Bombshell: No Right to Remain Silent


JHERB

Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Senior Member
  • Followers:  4
  • Topic Count:  82
  • Topics Per Day:  0.02
  • Content Count:  789
  • Content Per Day:  0.15
  • Reputation:   123
  • Days Won:  4
  • Joined:  11/06/2009
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  11/23/1971

The Supreme Court handed down a decision on June 17 that has been ignored by most media outlets, despite its devastating effect on one of the most fundamental rights protected by the Constitution.

In a 5-4 ruling, the justices ruled that a person no longer has the right to remain silent as guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment. In relevant part, the Fifth Amendment mandates that no one “shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself.”

read more:

http://thenewamerican.com/usnews/constitution/item/15787-supreme-court-bombshell-no-right-to-remain-silent

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And so, it would seem, that what the Soviet Union wanted to do to the USA for over 60 years . . . we are doing to ourselves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Worthy Ministers
  • Followers:  29
  • Topic Count:  598
  • Topics Per Day:  0.08
  • Content Count:  56,128
  • Content Per Day:  7.56
  • Reputation:   27,856
  • Days Won:  271
  • Joined:  12/29/2003
  • Status:  Offline

I believe that's what Mr. Krushev said would happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Members
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  2
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  19
  • Content Per Day:  0.00
  • Reputation:   1
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  04/16/2013
  • Status:  Offline

As someone who is regularly embraced in UK law, such a move, here, would be devastating (& certainly challenged) to the Statute Book & European Conventionon on Human Rights - Mr Bumble in Dickens ' A Christmas Carol' was absolutely right when declaring; "The law is a <<< butt >>> "!
C+

Edited by GoldenEagle
Removed profanity please follow the ToS.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  4
  • Topic Count:  764
  • Topics Per Day:  0.18
  • Content Count:  7,626
  • Content Per Day:  1.81
  • Reputation:   1,559
  • Days Won:  44
  • Joined:  10/03/2012
  • Status:  Offline

Please do not use profanity. From the Terms of Service...

 

The use of profanity will not be tolerated. This includes sexually explicit, vulgar, or other profane language or usernames as well as any any signs or symbols that suggests such. Do not post sexually explicit, vulgar or offensive website addresses (URL's) to the forum. (Eph. 4: 29)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Members
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  15
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  58
  • Content Per Day:  0.01
  • Reputation:   12
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  06/19/2013
  • Status:  Offline

As someone who is regularly embraced in UK law, such a move, here, would be devastating (& certainly challenged) to the Statute Book & European Conventionon on Human Rights - Mr Bumble in Dickens ' A Christmas Carol' was absolutely right when declaring; "The law is a <<< butt >>> "!

C+

You have to understand, most of the citizens in the US are clueless, and that is being nice.

 

We now have in America a government that can detain you indefinitely without due process that was guaranteed under the Constitution via the NDAA signed into law by President Obama.  Did Americans care during the 2012 elections?  Nope.  

 

Maybe keeping the US educational system ranked 48th in the world is the key to keeping the populace oblivious.

Then again, during the reign of FDR, innocent Japanese Americans were rounded up and thrown into prison.  Maybe nothing has really changed.

Edited by wonby1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Members
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  2
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  19
  • Content Per Day:  0.00
  • Reputation:   1
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  04/16/2013
  • Status:  Offline

Hi Wonby1 - It is disturbing how much of the law (Prosecution & Defence) is being hamstrung by back door, almost covert, Parliamentary action here. I have the impression, from US colleagues, that this is getting more prevalent at your end - though recent experience, even on this site, shows me we can all be tempted with taking thie law into our own hands!

Rath de Ort; C+

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...