Jump to content
IGNORED

govt doesnt want public to shoot down drones


ayin jade

Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Worthy Ministers
  • Followers:  27
  • Topic Count:  338
  • Topics Per Day:  0.05
  • Content Count:  15,714
  • Content Per Day:  2.45
  • Reputation:   8,534
  • Days Won:  39
  • Joined:  10/25/2006
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  02/27/1985

Resistance is not futile-we all know who wins in the end. But the problem is, the world does not know-and they won't know if we hide in our little churches. They will know when we get out and make a stand. Not because we don't know the outcome-but because we do know the outcome, and we need to stand for what is right, for what is true, so that others may see the truth. We need to show the world we are not cowards hiding under a steeple-but men and woman of courage, standing for what is right-regardless of the circumstances, no matter how hopeless it seem-because we serve an almighty God who is standing beside us giving us that courage.

Stand for truth-regardless of how hopeless it seems, and remember the night is always darkest before the dawn.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Members
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  0
  • Topics Per Day:  0
  • Content Count:  19
  • Content Per Day:  0.00
  • Reputation:   2
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  07/20/2013
  • Status:  Offline

If you are not doing anything wrong then you have nothing to worry about.

 

 

 

You are so right.  Everyone in prison guilty, all the Japanese in America and Jews in Germany during WWII were outright criminals. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ha! I would so buy a license. Anyone care to join me for a drone hunting trip in colorado?

What about non govt drones, how will know whose drone it is, I am sure most of these just belong to hobbiests. If I were a normal person (one whose income is at least 25% for the federal poverty line, I might buy one myself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Worthy Ministers
  • Followers:  44
  • Topic Count:  6,178
  • Topics Per Day:  0.87
  • Content Count:  43,798
  • Content Per Day:  6.19
  • Reputation:   11,244
  • Days Won:  58
  • Joined:  01/03/2005
  • Status:  Offline

 

 

 

 

And before I get bit for bringing obama into this, I merely used that to show how the govt already wants to use those against us citizens in a way that is not at all ok by me.

I understan what you are saying, but when did it become a crime to criticize the Obama Admin.?

 

You see how our thinking has changed already even here on a Christian site.

 

Thinking did not change here dave. I merely posted that in case anyone got upset for me dragging the current administration into it. Instead I got bit for explaining why I brought obama into this lol.

 

 

This is bigger than any one administration.   If there is one thing the last  decade plus has shown us, in the area of privacy and surveillance the Rs are not any better than the Ds

 

It's this one that is using them in a manner both Foreign and Domestic that has angered the world though.

 

Jade,

 

You didn't get bit. I'm asking a legit question as to why it is we feel we can't even mention Obama let alone criticize him even here. This is what Tyranny looks like by the way. People begin to whisper things in the dark that they normally would speak out in the Light.

 

I dont feel that I cannot criticize the president on this board. I posted for a few who take umbrage at any mention of him, by explaining why I mentioned him. Perhaps you feel that he cant be criticized openly. I dont see that happening here. What he cant be, as per the terms of service has always stated, is insulted. Its ok to say I feel his policies on something are a threat to our nation. It is not cool to say he is an idiot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Worthy Ministers
  • Followers:  44
  • Topic Count:  6,178
  • Topics Per Day:  0.87
  • Content Count:  43,798
  • Content Per Day:  6.19
  • Reputation:   11,244
  • Days Won:  58
  • Joined:  01/03/2005
  • Status:  Offline

 

Remember, obama wanted to use the drones to get that cop killer in california. He wanted to authorize lethal force with that. I do not want drones being used to spy on us and worse to attack us. 

 

Do you have a link to this story? 

 

 

I have a bunch of links, from various sources both conservative and liberal. Just in case you are fussy about sources lol.

 

http://www.theatlanticwire.com/national/2013/02/are-we-using-drones-find-ex-cop-christopher-dorner/61987/

 

http://www.theatlanticwire.com/politics/2013/02/take-rare-look-how-obama-decides-send-drones-kill-americans/61794/

 

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/02/11/are-drones-being-used-to-hunt-accused-cop-killer-the-first-human-target-on-u-s-soil/

 

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/02/05/are-drone-strikes-on-american-citizens-constitutional/

 

http://now.msn.com/christopher-dorner-is-first-drone-target-on-us-soil

 

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/02/11/christopher-dorner-drones_n_2663871.html

 

http://theweek.com/article/index/239976/should-the-lapd-use-drones-to-take-out-alleged-cop-killer-christopher-dorner

 

And there are far more articles out there discussing how drones can be used to take down americans on american soil, as in killing them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Removed from Forums for Breaking Terms of Service
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  18
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  1,740
  • Content Per Day:  0.44
  • Reputation:   183
  • Days Won:  7
  • Joined:  07/02/2013
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  07/02/1964

 

 

Remember, obama wanted to use the drones to get that cop killer in california. He wanted to authorize lethal force with that. I do not want drones being used to spy on us and worse to attack us. 

 

Do you have a link to this story? 

 

 

I have a bunch of links, from various sources both conservative and liberal. Just in case you are fussy about sources lol.

 

http://www.theatlanticwire.com/national/2013/02/are-we-using-drones-find-ex-cop-christopher-dorner/61987/

 

http://www.theatlanticwire.com/politics/2013/02/take-rare-look-how-obama-decides-send-drones-kill-americans/61794/

 

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/02/11/are-drones-being-used-to-hunt-accused-cop-killer-the-first-human-target-on-u-s-soil/

 

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/02/05/are-drone-strikes-on-american-citizens-constitutional/

 

http://now.msn.com/christopher-dorner-is-first-drone-target-on-us-soil

 

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/02/11/christopher-dorner-drones_n_2663871.html

 

http://theweek.com/article/index/239976/should-the-lapd-use-drones-to-take-out-alleged-cop-killer-christopher-dorner

 

And there are far more articles out there discussing how drones can be used to take down americans on american soil, as in killing them.

 

 

thank you for the links. 

 

Two things, first all of the links about Dorner are based on the same, unsubstantiated story.  There is no evidence it actually happened and it has been denied by the Border Patrol.

 

Second, none of the stories about Dorner mentioned Obama that I noticed.  So I am not sure where you got the news that Obama wanted to use drones to find Dorner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Worthy Ministers
  • Followers:  35
  • Topic Count:  100
  • Topics Per Day:  0.02
  • Content Count:  41,358
  • Content Per Day:  7.99
  • Reputation:   21,545
  • Days Won:  76
  • Joined:  03/13/2010
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  07/27/1957

 

is a police force using a drone really any different than them using a helicopter?

 

 

Helicopters aren't typically used for surveillance so if they're using it for surveillance, then yes.

 

Really what about traffic control in larger cities? That is purely surveillance. What about storm damage, fires, scenic tours etc... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  4
  • Topic Count:  1,285
  • Topics Per Day:  0.16
  • Content Count:  17,917
  • Content Per Day:  2.27
  • Reputation:   355
  • Days Won:  19
  • Joined:  10/01/2002
  • Status:  Offline

 

 

 

 

 

And before I get bit for bringing obama into this, I merely used that to show how the govt already wants to use those against us citizens in a way that is not at all ok by me.

I understan what you are saying, but when did it become a crime to criticize the Obama Admin.?

 

You see how our thinking has changed already even here on a Christian site.

 

Thinking did not change here dave. I merely posted that in case anyone got upset for me dragging the current administration into it. Instead I got bit for explaining why I brought obama into this lol.

 

 

This is bigger than any one administration.   If there is one thing the last  decade plus has shown us, in the area of privacy and surveillance the Rs are not any better than the Ds

 

It's this one that is using them in a manner both Foreign and Domestic that has angered the world though.

 

Jade,

 

You didn't get bit. I'm asking a legit question as to why it is we feel we can't even mention Obama let alone criticize him even here. This is what Tyranny looks like by the way. People begin to whisper things in the dark that they normally would speak out in the Light.

 

I dont feel that I cannot criticize the president on this board. I posted for a few who take umbrage at any mention of him, by explaining why I mentioned him. Perhaps you feel that he cant be criticized openly. I dont see that happening here. What he cant be, as per the terms of service has always stated, is insulted. Its ok to say I feel his policies on something are a threat to our nation. It is not cool to say he is an idiot.

 

No one said that he was. I think he's actually quite brilliant but devious.

 

Regardless, if you feel that you will get bit for mentioning him then we have a problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Removed from Forums for Breaking Terms of Service
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  21
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  272
  • Content Per Day:  0.07
  • Reputation:   21
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  04/29/2013
  • Status:  Offline

Drones around here?  Hardly.  This household has the reputation of doing experiments with intense magnetic fields, ya now the kind that the conspiracy theorists talk about in the Philadelphia experiment. As an electronic technician, that's nothing for us to do, so I hope these drones are not susceptible to strong magnetic fields. You often hear stories about supposed UFO's making cars and other electrical objects fail.  That's due to strong magnetic fields. So that would make such things incapacitated. Another thing we do is experiments with lasers.  We have one powerful enough that when it hits a tree the moisture inside vaporizes and the thing explodes violently.  One time the police were cruising around trying to ascertain what caused explosions that neighbors were reporting. BTW LASER stands for Light Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation. In layman’s terms, this means that a 'flash' of energy causes an excitation of electrons in a substance in which when they seek a lower orbit after giving off energy give off a specific frequency of energy, the same principle as fluorescent lighting from the gas gives off blues and greens. 

 

So what's this about the government trying to limit (or ban) automatic weapons such as AK-47's?  That's child's play compared to what I'm talking about. AK-47's are primitive. I'm into energy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...