Location of Real Mt.Sinai and Red Sea Crossing?

[BibleBoy]

Hi everybody in Jesus Christ's blessed name!

Here's links about what could be the real Red Sea crossing location and the real Mt.Sinai. Non-Christans need to read these links too.

http://www.bibleplus.org/discoveries/mtsinai.htm

This link talks about the Red Sea,Mt.Sinai,and Sodom and Gomorrah. http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/bb971126.htm

[Guest shiloh357]

Good links, Bibleboy!!

[Can Do (Phil 4:13)]

Hey BibleBoy,

Have you got any links where you can SEE the details being described in the text? I'm not doubting the validity of the text, but the pictures would be better if I could make them out properly.

Thanks a bunch!

Faithie

[apothanein kerdos]

Can Do, the pictures are in the first link.

I've actually seen the video about the two men who discovered this and saw their findings. Likewise, I've seen video from a skeptical family that went over there to disprove this issue and came back believers (they spoke at a recent service at my school). I must say, I am very skeptical when it comes to new findings...however, after looking at the biblical and geological evidence on this issue....I can't deny any of it... these findings are VERY valid.

I mean, think about it, tradition has them wandering the Siani desert for 40 years? It makes so much more sense once you place them in modern day Saudi Arabia. Plus, if you watch the video "Mountain of Fire" with Robert Cornuke which goes in depth and shows the video documentation of the exploration. What makes this all the more interesting is that he tags along with an agnostic historian and geologist who even states that following the Biblical guidance and by studying the mountain that one must come to the conclusion that this is the real site.

Here is a link to his book

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/search-h...0742632-3983054" target="_blank">here's a link to other stuff he's done

[Trinity]

They did so cross the Red Sea. They didn't cross the sea of reefs because they traced where it was at the time and it was and still is 2 feet high. Why would you have to part it if you can walk acrossed it with out parting it?

Also Mt. Sinai the one that you mite not believe is the True Mt. Sinai, well, it is burn't the whole top of the Mt. is burn't, unlike the other one (The one you say is the True on).

Sorry but we already know the truth and the truth is what we already know.

[apothanein kerdos]

They did so cross the Red Sea. They didn't cross the sea of reefs because they traced where it was at the time and it was and still is 2 feet high. Why would you have to part it if you can walk acrossed it with out parting it?

Also Mt. Sinai the one that you mite not believe is the True Mt. Sinai, well, it is burn't the whole top of the Mt. is burn't, unlike the other one (The one you say is the True on).

Sorry but we already know the truth and the truth is what we already know.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

What?

First, the "Red Sea" spoken of in the movie allows for the crossing of the Hebrews and the drowning of the Egyptians. The Bible talks about how a wind parted the waters. The interesting part about where they actually crossed is that it is higher than most of the Red Sea but still deep enough for you to have to swim in. In other words, God caused the water to part (or go away) and when the water came back, it would have come back in such a rush that it would cause the Egyptians to be swept away. Remember, even in 3 feet of water you can be washed out to sea in an undertoe.

As for the real Mt. Siani (I assume you're refering to the one in the Siani Penninsula) it doesn't make sense that this would be it. All of the physical evidencde points to the one in Saudi Arabia. The burnt top, the markings around the mountain, the alter, the split rock (exactly where it should be). In fact, these men follow Mt. Siani and follow the path that the Jews would have taken and run into all of the landmarks mentioned in the Exodus and Wilderness chapters. If you do this with the traditional Mt. Siani then you're out of luck, you won't find a thing.

[Trinity]

lol uhh... ok

[Guest shiloh357]

They did so cross the Red Sea. They didn't cross the sea of reefs because they traced where it was at the time and it was and still is 2 feet high. Why would you have to part it if you can walk acrossed it with out parting it?

Also Mt. Sinai the one that you mite not believe is the True Mt. Sinai, well, it is burn't the whole top of the Mt. is burn't, unlike the other one (The one you say is the True on).

Sorry but we already know the truth and the truth is what we already know.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

What?

First, the "Red Sea" spoken of in the movie allows for the crossing of the Hebrews and the drowning of the Egyptians. The Bible talks about how a wind parted the waters. The interesting part about where they actually crossed is that it is higher than most of the Red Sea but still deep enough for you to have to swim in. In other words, God caused the water to part (or go away) and when the water came back, it would have come back in such a rush that it would cause the Egyptians to be swept away. Remember, even in 3 feet of water you can be washed out to sea in an undertoe.

As for the real Mt. Siani (I assume you're refering to the one in the Siani Penninsula) it doesn't make sense that this would be it. All of the physical evidencde points to the one in Saudi Arabia. The burnt top, the markings around the mountain, the alter, the split rock (exactly where it should be). In fact, these men follow Mt. Siani and follow the path that the Jews would have taken and run into all of the landmarks mentioned in the Exodus and Wilderness chapters. If you do this with the traditional Mt. Siani then you're out of luck, you won't find a thing.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

I would also add that the Mt Sinai in Saudi Arabia has caves. It is also known as Mt. Horeb. Either Elijah or Elisha went into one of those caves. The mountain on the Sinai Peninnsula, does not have any caves.

Furthermore, the Mt. Horeb that Moses was on when he saw the burning bush was the same one God said he would bring the children of Israel to. That is exactly what Moses did. Moses was in Midian, and that is where he took them.

I am sorry Trinity, but you are mistaken if you think the true MT. Sinai is the traditional site. The evidence just does not support your assertion.

[Trinity]

oy vay... lol I just said i agreed with you all

So, Uh... your saying your wrong? because I said after SJ post i agreed with him lol haha just messing with you, Yes i agree with ye

[apothanein kerdos]

oy vay... lol I just said i agreed with you all

So, Uh... your saying your wrong? because I said after SJ post i agreed with him lol haha just messing with you, Yes i agree with ye

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Oi vey.... I knew I didn't understand you correctly on that.