Jump to content
IGNORED

Is Europe Gearing Up For World War III? Biggest Shipment Of US Armaments Since End Of Cold War Arrives In Germany Ahead Of NATO Exercises


WorthyNewsBot

Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Senior Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  2
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  642
  • Content Per Day:  0.13
  • Reputation:   405
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  08/08/2010
  • Status:  Offline

Regarding the comment by the poster named "other one" on Friday at 12:12 PM: "And we have several Republican Senators that seem hell bent on carrying out the CFR establishment wishes still... and if they do that we will be in an all out war with Russia and the Nukes will be falling here instead of Japan..." Note that Russia does not have to engage in an all-out war with the U.S. in order to be involved with the U.S. being nuked. Also, Russia could be involved with just two major cities in the U.S. being nuked, just as only two major cities in Japan (Hiroshima and Nagasaki) were nuked by the U.S. For Russian intelligence could be seriously compromised by moles working for the Antichrist's worldwide cabal, which needs to remove the U.S. as a superpower so that the Antichrist can take over the world. And these moles within Russian intelligence could be secretly helping North Korea to develop its nuclear weapons, two of which could end up nuking the U.S. Someone might ask: "But could not the U.S. simply expose the secret Russian assistance to North Korea, and so end it?" The answer would be "No". For Russia would simply deny any such assistance, which could be undetectable due to its being conducted by shuttling submarines which stay close to shore and do not breach the surface until after they have entered bunkers with underwater entrances in the Russian port of Vladivostok and the North Korean port of Chongjin. Also, Russia could use its veto power in the U.N. Security Council to thwart any U.N. resolutions against Russia for any such alleged (but unprovable) assistance to North Korea. Also, North Korea has already been helped to develop its own SLBMs (submarine-launched ballistic missiles), which it could sell, along with one of its submarines, for a huge amount of cash to an "Islamic terrorist" group, which could then be helped to sneak the sub past U.S. naval defenses and fire the nuclear missile at DC or NYC from hundreds of miles off the east coast of the U.S. Or, a North Korean nuke could simply be smuggled into the U.S. and detonated. And Russia could plausibly deny any involvement whatsoever in such an attack, if it is well-hidden by the Antichrist's cabal beneath multiple, onion-layer "shells" of "Islamic terrorist" groups supplied solely by "North Korea". Also, even if it could be proven that Russia was involved, even in an indirect way, in such an attack, the U.S. could not counter by sending a nuke against Russia, for fear of Russia then countering with another nuke attack. There is no way to win a nuclear war against Russia. It has too many nukes. MAD still reigns. Also, the U.S. could not even retaliate militarily against North Korea, because millions of South Koreans are in effect human shields for North Korea. That is, any U.S. military attack on North Korea would result in North Korea sending tens of thousands of rockets and missiles into the huge South Korean city of Seoul, which is very close to the border with North Korea. So both Russia and North Korea could "get away" with being involved with a nuke attack on two U.S. cities (even DC and NYC), without suffering any military retaliation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Worthy Ministers
  • Followers:  29
  • Topic Count:  593
  • Topics Per Day:  0.08
  • Content Count:  55,768
  • Content Per Day:  7.55
  • Reputation:   27,531
  • Days Won:  270
  • Joined:  12/29/2003
  • Status:  Offline

I guess the protests and riots that happened in Russia after Hillary’s ranting in their press causing Putin a lot of trouble. She was ranting about how corrupt their election process was.  Guess that really wouldn't be any reason.

Or when Hillary Sent her assistant secretary of state to Ukraine with the CIA and coordinated the overthrow of the elected government, then got them not to renew the lease on the Russian warm water port in Crimea and made public moving a NATO fleet right next to their southern border......  I guess that shouldn't bother him....  Crimea used to be a part of Russia and when they took it back Hillary wants to put severe sanctions against them.......   one might expect him choosing sides to be something outrageous?   The man has all the right in the world to dislike her above almost anyone.

Putin had made it very clear that Russia would go to Total war over Crimea.  He made it very clear that he would not allow us to remove Assad from Syria for the needs of his country, and Hillary set things up and would have continued that fight.

If Hillary wins, Russia goes to war.

Putin did have a lot at stake in this election.

 

Edited by other one
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Seventh Day Adventist
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  10
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  480
  • Content Per Day:  0.16
  • Reputation:   212
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  11/06/2015
  • Status:  Offline

On ‎19‎/‎01‎/‎2017 at 7:12 PM, other one said:

because when she was secretary of state she caused the overthrow of the Ukraine government and moved NATO troops next to their borders and then tried to take Russia's only warm water port next to their country....   the only other warm water port they have access to is the one in Syria which Hillary was determined to get rid of Assad and they would loose that one also.

We as a country has for the past 10 years tried to isolate Russia and put them back in debt with the global central banker which Putin had managed to completely pay out of debt.   And we have several Republican Senators that seem hell bent on carrying out the CFR establishment wishes still...     and if they do that we will be in an all out war with Russia and the Nukes will be falling here instead of Japan...    and we will deserve every single one of them if we let these people keep going.

Other one, you are right on...if any country tries to get out of debt to the international banksters they will feel the wrath of the CFR/globalists, and if any country tries to create real currency outside the banksters national banks/federal reserve, they will also feel the wrath of these global thugs...

Note any country that tries to follow their own nationalist monetary interests and prosper as such is in for the "globalists" attacking them...Iraq, Libya, Syria are some examples..not to mention past presidents of the USA who were assassinated trying to rid this country of the parasitic debt financing system we are still under..Lincoln, Mckinley, Kennedy to mention 3.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Worthy Ministers
  • Followers:  29
  • Topic Count:  593
  • Topics Per Day:  0.08
  • Content Count:  55,768
  • Content Per Day:  7.55
  • Reputation:   27,531
  • Days Won:  270
  • Joined:  12/29/2003
  • Status:  Offline

In the year 2000, when George Bush took over there were only 8 countries without Rothschild controlled Central Banks.

Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Libya, Sudan, Cuba and North Korea.

It's interesting that the next two presidential administrations went to war with so many of these......   and working on Iran...

LoL and we wonder why the crazy leader of North Korea is so paranoid  LoL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...