LadyKay Posted January 25, 2017 Group: Royal Member Followers: 12 Topic Count: 385 Topics Per Day: 0.10 Content Count: 7,692 Content Per Day: 1.93 Reputation: 4,809 Days Won: 3 Joined: 05/28/2013 Status: Offline Share Posted January 25, 2017 (edited) Boy Paul certainly caused a lot of fuss with the letters he wrote to the churches. Jesus didn't saying anything about women not doing stuff. "And he said unto them, Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature." Mark 16:15 KJV I see nothing in this that say only the men should go into the world and preach the gospel. Or women can only teach the gospel to other women. No. I do not see that at all. Surely if it was the case that only men should do this, wouldn't Jesus have said this? But he didn't I don't recall Jesus saying anything about women having one roll and men having another. Edited January 25, 2017 by LadyKay Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LadyKay Posted January 25, 2017 Group: Royal Member Followers: 12 Topic Count: 385 Topics Per Day: 0.10 Content Count: 7,692 Content Per Day: 1.93 Reputation: 4,809 Days Won: 3 Joined: 05/28/2013 Status: Offline Share Posted January 25, 2017 Sometimes I wonder if Paul got everything right. I mean what about this other part of the verse what does that mean? "But women will be saved through childbearing--if they continue in faith, love and holiness with propriety." 1 Timothy 2:15. Is Paul saying that a women can not be saved unless she gives birth? That they have to work in faith and in love to earn their salvation? I thought salvation was not obtain through works. But according to Paul, this is the only way a women can be saved. I'm not trying to start a fight here. But I am truly not understanding this part of scripture. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LadyKay Posted January 25, 2017 Group: Royal Member Followers: 12 Topic Count: 385 Topics Per Day: 0.10 Content Count: 7,692 Content Per Day: 1.93 Reputation: 4,809 Days Won: 3 Joined: 05/28/2013 Status: Offline Share Posted January 25, 2017 30 minutes ago, Yowm said: maybe He should be charged with discrimination? Okay. This is getting ugly now and I should go. I'm not suppose to be debating stuff anyway. So anyway, you all work this out among yourselves. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
creativemechanic Posted January 25, 2017 Group: Diamond Member Followers: 7 Topic Count: 414 Topics Per Day: 0.12 Content Count: 1,273 Content Per Day: 0.36 Reputation: 518 Days Won: 0 Joined: 09/22/2014 Status: Offline Author Share Posted January 25, 2017 OK. I seriously felt convicted for starting this post. I think its only sowing discord amongst us. I want to apologise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LadyKay Posted January 25, 2017 Group: Royal Member Followers: 12 Topic Count: 385 Topics Per Day: 0.10 Content Count: 7,692 Content Per Day: 1.93 Reputation: 4,809 Days Won: 3 Joined: 05/28/2013 Status: Offline Share Posted January 25, 2017 7 minutes ago, Davida said: where oh where was the ugliness? Pretty quick to take offence if someone disagrees with your opinion. You people just wont let this go will you. It is getting ugly. Anyone can see that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LadyKay Posted January 25, 2017 Group: Royal Member Followers: 12 Topic Count: 385 Topics Per Day: 0.10 Content Count: 7,692 Content Per Day: 1.93 Reputation: 4,809 Days Won: 3 Joined: 05/28/2013 Status: Offline Share Posted January 25, 2017 16 hours ago, LadyKay said: If you don't agree with women pastors then don't attend a church that has one. This was my first reply to this topic. What I thought was a simple, to the point replay. Not judging anyone or disagreeing with anyone's believe. I thought no one could be upset or find criticism with this statement. But someone did. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
missmuffet Posted January 25, 2017 Group: Royal Member Followers: 34 Topic Count: 1,991 Topics Per Day: 0.48 Content Count: 48,689 Content Per Day: 11.81 Reputation: 30,343 Days Won: 226 Joined: 01/11/2013 Status: Offline Share Posted January 25, 2017 2 minutes ago, LadyKay said: This was my first reply to this topic. What I thought was a simple, to the point replay. Not judging anyone or disagreeing with anyone's believe. I thought no one could be upset or find criticism with this statement. But someone did. Not be upset or find criticism? That will be the day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LadyKay Posted January 25, 2017 Group: Royal Member Followers: 12 Topic Count: 385 Topics Per Day: 0.10 Content Count: 7,692 Content Per Day: 1.93 Reputation: 4,809 Days Won: 3 Joined: 05/28/2013 Status: Offline Share Posted January 25, 2017 1 minute ago, Davida said: Who is upset? Others were replying . No one else said it was getting "ugly". Go read what was said to me. I was accused of using liberal tactics. I don't even know what liberal tactics are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ezra Posted January 25, 2017 Group: Royal Member Followers: 16 Topic Count: 134 Topics Per Day: 0.04 Content Count: 8,142 Content Per Day: 2.35 Reputation: 6,612 Days Won: 20 Joined: 11/02/2014 Status: Offline Share Posted January 25, 2017 19 hours ago, Yowm said: Scripture twisting...first step of a biblical slide downhill. Yes, Scripture twisting. But also weak and cowardly men who refuse to stand up and preach the truth. They look for popularity rather than principle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ezra Posted January 25, 2017 Group: Royal Member Followers: 16 Topic Count: 134 Topics Per Day: 0.04 Content Count: 8,142 Content Per Day: 2.35 Reputation: 6,612 Days Won: 20 Joined: 11/02/2014 Status: Offline Share Posted January 25, 2017 2 hours ago, LadyKay said: Boy Paul certainly caused a lot of fuss with the letters he wrote to the churches. Jesus didn't saying anything about women not doing stuff. This is a very naive observation. The fact that Christ had twelve MALE apostles should be sufficient evidence that He would be the one to bar women from preaching and teaching in churches. Furthermore, since Paul's letters were inspired by the Holy Spirit, what you are really saying is that God's letters caused a lot of fuss. So do you believe that over half the New Testament is not really the Word of God? Or do you believe that women can do as they please regardless of what is in the NT? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts