The Barbarian Posted February 26, 2020 Group: Royal Member Followers: 3 Topic Count: 27 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 5,074 Content Per Day: 0.67 Reputation: 970 Days Won: 0 Joined: 06/20/2003 Status: Offline Share Posted February 26, 2020 41 minutes ago, dad2 said: It assumes that so called lower life forms are where 'higher' life forms came from. Nope. Evolutionary theory doesn't consider lower or higher as terms for lifeforms. This goes back to the point that you'd be more effective if you actually knew what evolutionary theory is. 42 minutes ago, dad2 said: We can start with the ancestor to flatworms and man if you like. You see it does matter that you claim this is where man came from. Evolutionary theory says man came from other primates. You see, it would help if you knew what you were talking about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Barbarian Posted February 26, 2020 Group: Royal Member Followers: 3 Topic Count: 27 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 5,074 Content Per Day: 0.67 Reputation: 970 Days Won: 0 Joined: 06/20/2003 Status: Offline Share Posted February 26, 2020 1 hour ago, dad2 said: Since I look to God's word, I could never overestimate the knowledge He gives. Dunning-Kruger applies to you there, too. You've confused your new doctrine with God's word. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
one.opinion Posted February 26, 2020 Group: Royal Member Followers: 6 Topic Count: 29 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 5,240 Content Per Day: 2.10 Reputation: 1,356 Days Won: 4 Joined: 07/03/2017 Status: Offline Share Posted February 26, 2020 3 hours ago, HAZARD said: Examples: Would it make any sort of difference if I went through your list and showed point-by-point where the argumentation is appropriate and where it is not? You seem to be fully immune to the influence of evidence, yet you are still attempting to use science-y arguments against evolution. At some point, it may be more simpler to say “I don’t know the evidence for evolution and am not interested in knowing it. My interpretation of God’s Word is good enough for me.” God is in no need of our poorly constructed defenses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dad2 Posted February 26, 2020 Group: Diamond Member Followers: 0 Topic Count: 18 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 1,510 Content Per Day: 0.97 Reputation: 185 Days Won: 0 Joined: 01/28/2020 Status: Offline Share Posted February 26, 2020 1 hour ago, The Barbarian said: Quote Nope. Evolutionary theory doesn't consider lower or higher as terms for lifeforms. Yep, I consider flatworms lower than mankind. It doesn't much matter what science classifies them as. And TOE does teach that simpler life forms are where you came from. The bible teaches that God created man and woman. Quote Evolutionary theory says man came from other primates. I think we all know that. It might be better if you stopped being deceptive. Before the supposed primate thing there was a long list of things TOE say we came from. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dad2 Posted February 26, 2020 Group: Diamond Member Followers: 0 Topic Count: 18 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 1,510 Content Per Day: 0.97 Reputation: 185 Days Won: 0 Joined: 01/28/2020 Status: Offline Share Posted February 26, 2020 1 hour ago, The Barbarian said: Dunning-Kruger applies to you there, too. You've confused your new doctrine with God's word. Genesis is not new. Creation is not new. Lies of the serpent about God being a liar are not new. Some just couch them in 'christian' dress these days. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dad2 Posted February 26, 2020 Group: Diamond Member Followers: 0 Topic Count: 18 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 1,510 Content Per Day: 0.97 Reputation: 185 Days Won: 0 Joined: 01/28/2020 Status: Offline Share Posted February 26, 2020 40 minutes ago, one.opinion said: At some point, it may be more simpler to say “I don’t know the evidence for evolution and am not interested in knowing it. Define the word evolution as used here. Are you referring to observed adaptations such as to bacteria or whatever today, or are you referring to the imaginary long progression of evolving that led to man and animals today that is claimed in the TOE? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
appy Posted February 26, 2020 Group: Royal Member Followers: 23 Topic Count: 133 Topics Per Day: 0.03 Content Count: 2,864 Content Per Day: 0.61 Reputation: 2,596 Days Won: 2 Joined: 08/07/2011 Status: Offline Share Posted February 26, 2020 5 hours ago, Godismyloveforever said: So, this horse walks into a bar and then said he thought it was an icecream store. This is because he wanted some icecream. But, because it was not an icecream store he left. ?? Edit to ask @appy if she wants some icecream. you is one silly chicken. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Barbarian Posted February 26, 2020 Group: Royal Member Followers: 3 Topic Count: 27 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 5,074 Content Per Day: 0.67 Reputation: 970 Days Won: 0 Joined: 06/20/2003 Status: Offline Share Posted February 26, 2020 8 hours ago, dad2 said: Genesis is not new. Creation is not new. The YE creationist revision of Genesis is very new. 8 hours ago, dad2 said: Lies of the serpent about God being a liar are not new. I don't think you're calling God a liar, exactly. Rather you've convinced yourself that your new doctrines are part of Genesis. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Barbarian Posted February 26, 2020 Group: Royal Member Followers: 3 Topic Count: 27 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 5,074 Content Per Day: 0.67 Reputation: 970 Days Won: 0 Joined: 06/20/2003 Status: Offline Share Posted February 26, 2020 Barbarian observes: Evolutionary theory says man came from other primates. 8 hours ago, dad2 said: I think we all know that. You should; you've been repeatedly told this, but you keep pretending that evolutionary theory says we evolved from flatworms. It might be better if you stopped being deceptive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Barbarian Posted February 26, 2020 Group: Royal Member Followers: 3 Topic Count: 27 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 5,074 Content Per Day: 0.67 Reputation: 970 Days Won: 0 Joined: 06/20/2003 Status: Offline Share Posted February 26, 2020 9 hours ago, one.opinion said: Would it make any sort of difference if I went through your list and showed point-by-point where the argumentation is appropriate and where it is not? He's playing the old "Gish Gallop"; "throw out so many fake claims that they can't answer all of them, and then declare victory when some of them aren't refuted." He just found a list somewhere and did a quick cut and paste. Easier than thinking. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts