Jump to content
IGNORED

9/11 one time news story


other one

Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Worthy Ministers
  • Followers:  29
  • Topic Count:  598
  • Topics Per Day:  0.08
  • Content Count:  56,171
  • Content Per Day:  7.56
  • Reputation:   27,900
  • Days Won:  271
  • Joined:  12/29/2003
  • Status:  Offline

 

  • Well Said! 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  6
  • Topic Count:  6
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  4,265
  • Content Per Day:  2.92
  • Reputation:   2,302
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  05/03/2020
  • Status:  Offline

Is this some sort of smoking gun for the Truthers? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Worthy Ministers
  • Followers:  29
  • Topic Count:  598
  • Topics Per Day:  0.08
  • Content Count:  56,171
  • Content Per Day:  7.56
  • Reputation:   27,900
  • Days Won:  271
  • Joined:  12/29/2003
  • Status:  Offline

2 hours ago, teddyv said:

Is this some sort of smoking gun for the Truthers? 

Just a news story that I heard when it happened.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  774
  • Topics Per Day:  0.34
  • Content Count:  6,944
  • Content Per Day:  3.06
  • Reputation:   1,980
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  02/15/2018
  • Status:  Online

On 10/7/2021 at 8:09 AM, other one said:

Just a news story that I heard when it happened.

There was no plane but you are supposed to believe paparica and be good citizen.

Edited by R. Hartono
  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  8
  • Topic Count:  162
  • Topics Per Day:  0.02
  • Content Count:  7,844
  • Content Per Day:  1.13
  • Reputation:   2,105
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  04/21/2005
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  03/23/1964

One of the most 'telling' videos for me was this one, mainly about building 7
Also, in the video he mentions about 500 engineers and scientists who signed up to this, and that number has now more than doubled

 

911: Explosive Evidence
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

  • Group:  Advanced Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  5
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  341
  • Content Per Day:  0.40
  • Reputation:   231
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  01/05/2022
  • Status:  Offline

I was studying engineering at university when 9/11 happened and it became a talking point in or classes.

As young students we didn't care about the motivations or who did what, we just wanted to break it down and explain exactly how the buildings collapsed from a technical point of view.

Now... If we drop a hammer from the height of the tower it would take 10 seconds to reach the ground in a free fall.

753237857_twintowers.jpg.0341b1b2f7dce5c179672b602744e895.jpg

When the towers collapsed it took them only 10 seconds as well, as if it was free falling... But it couldn't have possibly been free falling unless the building below the crash zone was already falling as well. That is only possible with explosives as there was no damage, below the crash zone, for it to fail like it did. What we should of seen was a deceleration in the collapse as each floor would of provided some resistance to slow it down.

We applied this theory to some scaled down simulations and confirmed our mathematical findings through practical experimentation. While the steel at the crash zone would of got soft enough to fail the same can't be said for the rest of the steel below it.

So what we concluded was this; the two towers had explosives detonated from below the crash zone for it to fall like that. It free fell which defies the laws of physics, in particular, Newtons 3 law of motion where an applied force to an object is always met by the same amount of force in the opposite direction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Worthy Ministers
  • Followers:  29
  • Topic Count:  598
  • Topics Per Day:  0.08
  • Content Count:  56,171
  • Content Per Day:  7.56
  • Reputation:   27,900
  • Days Won:  271
  • Joined:  12/29/2003
  • Status:  Offline

where.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Advanced Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  5
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  341
  • Content Per Day:  0.40
  • Reputation:   231
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  01/05/2022
  • Status:  Offline

On 10/7/2021 at 1:09 PM, R. Hartono said:

There was no plane but you are supposed to believe paparica and be good citizen.

What do you mean there was no planes? Didn't we all see planes hit the buildings?

For the record i don't think the planes caused the collapse. I explained my theory above

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  774
  • Topics Per Day:  0.34
  • Content Count:  6,944
  • Content Per Day:  3.06
  • Reputation:   1,980
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  02/15/2018
  • Status:  Online

4 minutes ago, Warrior of truth said:

What do you mean there was no planes? Didn't we all see planes hit the buildings?

For the record i don't think the planes caused the collapse. I explained my theory above

No plane at Pentagon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  774
  • Topics Per Day:  0.34
  • Content Count:  6,944
  • Content Per Day:  3.06
  • Reputation:   1,980
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  02/15/2018
  • Status:  Online

2 hours ago, other one said:

where.jpg

Its called  controlled demolition

Never believe this tragedy is orchestrated by the Arab. This is to promote the 2nd beast of Revelation who will force Arab religion to the world and call fire at the 3rd Temple 

@Warrior of truth

 

 

Edited by R. Hartono
  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...