Jayne Posted July 8, 2022 Group: Royal Member Followers: 16 Topic Count: 108 Topics Per Day: 0.04 Content Count: 3,828 Content Per Day: 1.29 Reputation: 4,818 Days Won: 2 Joined: 03/31/2016 Status: Offline Share Posted July 8, 2022 Two people are in the wrong here. [1.] The person who took the picture and sent it to others. This person was obviously AT THE party or club. And he/she was obviously squatting down or sitting down to get an up-the-skirt photo. WHY is he/she sending this photo to uptight Christians? [2] The person who sent this photo to the girl's parents with no intention for anything except sticking his/her nose into something that is not his business. He won't even acknowledge the dad's request for him to pray for the girl. This person does not have the girl's salvation at heart, only her "sinful" dancing. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fidei Defensor Posted July 9, 2022 Group: Royal Member Followers: 18 Topic Count: 165 Topics Per Day: 0.06 Content Count: 3,997 Content Per Day: 1.55 Reputation: 2,607 Days Won: 15 Joined: 04/29/2017 Status: Offline Share Posted July 9, 2022 6 hours ago, Jayne said: Two people are in the wrong here. [1.] The person who took the picture and sent it to others. This person was obviously AT THE party or club. And he/she was obviously squatting down or sitting down to get an up-the-skirt photo. WHY is he/she sending this photo to uptight Christians? [2] The person who sent this photo to the girl's parents with no intention for anything except sticking his/her nose into something that is not his business. He won't even acknowledge the dad's request for him to pray for the girl. This person does not have the girl's salvation at heart, only her "sinful" dancing. Funny how we say “it takes a village to raise people,” but then when someone in village takes a picture and raises a concern its “error, infringement, and intrusion.” Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marathoner Posted July 9, 2022 Group: Royal Member Followers: 16 Topic Count: 73 Topics Per Day: 0.05 Content Count: 10,388 Content Per Day: 7.12 Reputation: 13,477 Days Won: 99 Joined: 05/24/2020 Status: Offline Share Posted July 9, 2022 I wouldn't be concerned at all. I wasn't raised going to church and the Lord was never mentioned under my parents' roof at any time, and yet I came to Jesus Christ. Thousands in Islamic nations such as Iran have come to the Lord. He knows who belongs to Him. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
creativemechanic Posted July 9, 2022 Group: Diamond Member Followers: 7 Topic Count: 414 Topics Per Day: 0.12 Content Count: 1,273 Content Per Day: 0.36 Reputation: 518 Days Won: 0 Joined: 09/22/2014 Status: Offline Author Share Posted July 9, 2022 10 hours ago, Starise said: I'm sorry I might be slightly OCD and it's bothering me. The title of this thread should correctly read- When your child isn't interested in God Or you could say When your child is not interested in God. yeah i noticed it right after posting but I didnt bother editing it. Thanks though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
teddyv Posted July 9, 2022 Group: Royal Member Followers: 6 Topic Count: 6 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 4,265 Content Per Day: 2.89 Reputation: 2,302 Days Won: 1 Joined: 05/03/2020 Status: Offline Share Posted July 9, 2022 7 hours ago, Jayne said: Two people are in the wrong here. [1.] The person who took the picture and sent it to others. This person was obviously AT THE party or club. And he/she was obviously squatting down or sitting down to get an up-the-skirt photo. WHY is he/she sending this photo to uptight Christians? [2] The person who sent this photo to the girl's parents with no intention for anything except sticking his/her nose into something that is not his business. He won't even acknowledge the dad's request for him to pray for the girl. This person does not have the girl's salvation at heart, only her "sinful" dancing. I'm not sure if you're just playing along with the scenario but that image is no photograph. It looks like a manga style drawing. Again, not sure if the OP is just setting up a hypothetical. I just don't think the text exchange is real. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
creativemechanic Posted July 9, 2022 Group: Diamond Member Followers: 7 Topic Count: 414 Topics Per Day: 0.12 Content Count: 1,273 Content Per Day: 0.36 Reputation: 518 Days Won: 0 Joined: 09/22/2014 Status: Offline Author Share Posted July 9, 2022 2 minutes ago, teddyv said: I'm not sure if you're just playing along with the scenario but that image is no photograph. It looks like a manga style drawing. Again, not sure if the OP is just setting up a hypothetical. I just don't think the text exchange is real. Its a fake convo based on an actual situation I know of. I chose the cartoon image cause it wouldnt be right to put a real humans pic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
teddyv Posted July 9, 2022 Group: Royal Member Followers: 6 Topic Count: 6 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 4,265 Content Per Day: 2.89 Reputation: 2,302 Days Won: 1 Joined: 05/03/2020 Status: Offline Share Posted July 9, 2022 2 minutes ago, creativemechanic said: Its a fake convo based on an actual situation I know of. I chose the cartoon image cause it wouldnt be right to put a real humans pic Ok, that clears that up for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jayne Posted July 9, 2022 Group: Royal Member Followers: 16 Topic Count: 108 Topics Per Day: 0.04 Content Count: 3,828 Content Per Day: 1.29 Reputation: 4,818 Days Won: 2 Joined: 03/31/2016 Status: Offline Share Posted July 9, 2022 28 minutes ago, teddyv said: I'm not sure if you're just playing along with the scenario but that image is no photograph. It looks like a manga style drawing. Again, not sure if the OP is just setting up a hypothetical. I just don't think the text exchange is real. It's very hard for me to see that, but I assumed it was a cartoon meant to be real photo. I assumed the fake man in the image was sent a fake photo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jayne Posted July 9, 2022 Group: Royal Member Followers: 16 Topic Count: 108 Topics Per Day: 0.04 Content Count: 3,828 Content Per Day: 1.29 Reputation: 4,818 Days Won: 2 Joined: 03/31/2016 Status: Offline Share Posted July 9, 2022 1 hour ago, Fidei Defensor said: Funny how we say “it takes a village to raise people,” but then when someone in village takes a picture and raises a concern its “error, infringement, and intrusion.” Taking a photo of a girl with her skirt up and sending it to people not in her family just for kicks is NOT a village raising young people. Hypothethically, if she were one year younger in some states, sending the photo [fake as it is in the OP] might get the sender of the photo in trouble. I certainly hope you don't think doing something like this in real life with real photos is the Christian thing to do. Again, hypothetically, why did the person who took the photo [yes, I know it's a cartoon, but it represents a real photo in the story], but why did that person send it to a MAN who is NOT her father? That's just creepy!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abrielle Posted July 9, 2022 Group: Advanced Member Followers: 8 Topic Count: 4 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 204 Content Per Day: 0.13 Reputation: 281 Days Won: 0 Joined: 12/27/2019 Status: Offline Share Posted July 9, 2022 (This is an hypothetical Clarke, so I feel free to be a little bit harsh on my judgments towards Brother Clarke.) I wouldn't reply to Brother Clarke the second time. Why bother? I'm too lazy for people who come with problems and show no interest in creating a solution. He didn't write anything like: "What can we do to help? What does she like? What causes matter to her? And what about you, can we pray together, brother?", or any idea, so why bother answering Brother Clarke? He is the type of person who answers himself to what he says, regardless of what you tell him, he will always listen to himself, he lives in his monologue. He didn't even have the courtesy of talking personally about a painful subject to a parent. Or maybe I would reply: "Yes, it does look bad, because it is bad. Have a nice week!" but I am avoiding my provocative side, so... Ignoring is best. I wouldn't be upset either. It would be a neutral interaction. We all have our limitations. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts